The terms of service are presented to each user at the time of sign up. You either agree, or you don’t.
There is no magical fix coming from Uncle Sam. Grow up and read the fine print before signing off next time.
Spez: the brunette in the back is smoking hot, if not bored out of her mind.
Cuck: oh look at the downvotes from the social media addicts that demand that the federal government make a private company behave a certain way because of misconceptions about what the 1A actually applies to. How about you grow a spine, leave the abusive services, and put your money where your mouth is? Stop being codependent whiners, and admit you signed up for exactly what you got. Tough love pedes, I'm here to teach you, not watch you cry and beg to be coddled by Uncle Sam. Wrap your heads around the situation and act accordingly.
Section 230 protects social media sites from being sued based on the content on their website. They couldn't exist without it. Unfortunately, it would apply to all websites.
Understood. Twatter users might not be able to successfully sue Twatter. However, 230 protects Twatter from non-users suing them for slanderous comments on their website. Non-users didn't agree to ToS.
Section 230 is irrelevant.
The terms of service are presented to each user at the time of sign up. You either agree, or you don’t.
There is no magical fix coming from Uncle Sam. Grow up and read the fine print before signing off next time.
Spez: the brunette in the back is smoking hot, if not bored out of her mind.
Cuck: oh look at the downvotes from the social media addicts that demand that the federal government make a private company behave a certain way because of misconceptions about what the 1A actually applies to. How about you grow a spine, leave the abusive services, and put your money where your mouth is? Stop being codependent whiners, and admit you signed up for exactly what you got. Tough love pedes, I'm here to teach you, not watch you cry and beg to be coddled by Uncle Sam. Wrap your heads around the situation and act accordingly.
Section 230 protects social media sites from being sued based on the content on their website. They couldn't exist without it. Unfortunately, it would apply to all websites.
Rescind 230 protections tomorrow.
Now sue the service. Guess what happens next?
They show you the terms of use, that you agreed with, but are now whining about. And your case evaporates.
The terms of service are black and white. If you do not agree, then stop using the service.
It really can't get any more simple, and clear. Hope that helps.
Understood. Twatter users might not be able to successfully sue Twatter. However, 230 protects Twatter from non-users suing them for slanderous comments on their website. Non-users didn't agree to ToS.