289
Comments (10)
sorted by:
3
DemsFuckKids 3 points ago +3 / -0

She was bad ass

3
EnigMirage 3 points ago +3 / -0

At the end she says specifically she's been in contact with the Trump campaign, that this was all going to be released next week and she wasn't supposed to talk about it but she didn't care, she was going to talk about it.

Uhhh...way to go off track at the expense of Trump's strategy. Good info, terrible witness.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought it was just that she was originally supposed to work at election hq instead of the TCF center that she wasn't supposed to talk about, because apparently there is more to that story.

1
glasses2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

This isn't the first time this woman has told this story. Her original written testimony from 3 weeks ago does not mention the Election HQ Center or anything about whether or not she was supposed to be there. I think that's what she's talking about, and why she returned to give a second testimony with the added information. Here's her original from November 8th. https://www.greatlakesjc.org/wp-content/uploads/Supplemental-Brief-Motion-for-TRO-Costantino.pdf

1
Kook [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it was good she wen't off scripts because of the hearing. This needed to be said during the hearing not after.

3
tdwin_throawayasanon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not very good at getting to the point, but she did have good info in the end.

1
sgt_richard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ya she seemed like an ex-lover going scorched earth so she was trying to get everyone thrown under the bus. But she gained steam halfway through and nailed it. That was a total love/hate video lol.

1
Kook [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, it was a little tough at first. Especially for the first 5 minutes. But I think it was all an act to reel them in and then hit them with some stone-cold truth and facts.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0