Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
i think toobin thought he was on chaturbate. i mean he is likely a pervert but he seriously got mixed up between a date with a camgirl and a work meeting.
Seriously! I stopped the video when he tilted the camera down to show what he was working on. That told me everything I needed to know: girls ain't into repetitive close-ups of the "last chicken in the shop" getting strangled. Whomever Lubein' Toobin was online with was a gay male.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD GET THIS PATRIOT A BRICK! THAT'S 171506 BRICKS HANDED OUT!
We are at 24.31309859277% of our goal to BUILD THE WALL starting from Imperial Beach, CA to Brownsville, Texas! Let's make sure everyone gets a brick in the United States! For every Centipede a brick, for every brick a Centipede
They won't ignore it because all we need is 3 judges for them to have to hear it. And it will get fast tracked if Alito decides to do so since he is in charge of PA. So that's positive.
They don't have to actually rule on it themselves, they can reverse the dismissal and force the state SC to rule on the conditionality of the law. That's the way they wriggle out, the state supreme court overturns the law but stops short of reversing the outcome. That'll make it easier for the SCOTUS to stop short of throwing out all those votes.
I hope that's not the reality, an unconditional election should be tossed, but i don't have confidence that they have 5 votes to toss the election, I've been disappointed too many times by the court stopping short of how they should rule.
So they are gonna pack the courts either way, because they're gonna steal the Georgia seats too and then Harris Biden have free reign to do anything they want.
i'm glad tim pool has pretty much said 'fuck you' to all media. he pretty much is now agreeing with alex jones after that fuckery he did to AJ a few weeks ago.
i feel like he knows it already but he is kinda reluctant to say it directly, if you know what i mean. so that he doesnt get blocked or removed from YT, which is his primary source of income. but yeah...wednesday he will have matt (the former stats guy for president trumps previous campaign on his show), gonna be good
Tbh it's actually incredibly shocking that YouTube HAS NOT banned Tim yet.
Like he says shit on his show all the time that the deep state wants to suppress. The media doesn't even give a fuck who he is. He's just a redpill merchant that KEEPS growing.
Now he wants to pump up production further. The man is starting a chain of redpill pharmacies and stated today that he wants to start attacking things from a culture standpoint.
He now wants to BUILD new culture and make conservatism cool to normies. And he blatantly just said this in a video.
The fact that Big Tech hasn't unpersonned him given all of this, is shocking. It's like he's got a fucking force field around his content or something.
I think it's mostly because of his fencesitting. Tim is the most REGULAR person you will probably find in this country, more or less. Take the average of all of the political leanings back in 2000 or so, and you basically get Tim Pool.
A lot of good people wouldn't want to work at a big SV company because the culture is toxic to conservatives. I don't even respond to recruiters from these companies anymore.
I'll bite the bullet and take a shot at it if somebody can get me in the door. I've got my resume and I'll have my bachelor's degree in May.
The pay is good and it's basically a golden ticket to any other job from what I understand. Any normie company that sees FAANG on your resume will probably want you.
Tbh it's not a bad deal to go there for a couple years, gather dirt, drop your findings to Project Veritas, and then be on your way.
I do imagine it's VERY toxic though based on what I've seen come out of the Veritas investigations.
Crowder will get banned from YT before Pool does. Though honestly, if Biden somehow makes it in, I wouldn't be surprised to see both of them, plus Styx and many more banned almost immediately as YT at that point won't have to give a shit any longer (who's gonna do what to 'em?).
Yes, he voted for Trump and didn't care at all that his own fucking vote wasn't worth shit in this fraudulent election. His flip-flopping is worse than his fence-sitting.
I know it's the popular thing to hate on Tim Pool right now but he consistently brings on guests that MSM won't touch, and that by itself has great value. I keep watching for people like Sean Parnell, if nothing else.
I think a lot of folks here are just mad that he is and has always been a liberal, not a secret MAGA conservative like many hoped. But you know what? If every liberal was like Tim, America wouldn't nearly be in the mess it is right now.
Tim is the first few steps for many people out of the democratic muck. Hes no Bongino, but Tim serves a purpose. People move their ideas very slowly, especially dems. They need someone to hear who isn't hard right, you've got to ease information into their minds slowly. If a far righter says it a dem will outright dismiss the info. If the info given is too far from their current position they will dismiss it. Years and decades of brainwashing by the media along with cognitive dissonance makes it very difficult to reach a lot of people.
Tim is slow and cautious opposition. We need people like him.
Bongino is a shill tbh and not even a smart one. Bannon/Raheem/Maxey are far more intellectually stimulating for based news. That being said, prayers up for Dan as he went through round 2 of Chemo today.
Yep. Well it’s show time. I feel like they should at least give it cert. if they deny cert just to duck the controversy that would be pretty cuck. But I wouldn’t put it past some of these judges. Especially after how they slandered some of them it would be pretty remarkable that they just deny cert outright.
OK real talk. what are the chances this gets accepted by the supreme court and, based on what evidence has been submitted or, based on the arguments that have been made by sean et. al, this case will be viewed favourably by justice alito? please anyone?
da case will prolly get heard for sure since its a stupid important constitutional matter. how da supremes will rule tho idk cause idk what lawsuit this.
If they grant writ here, that's a good sign they'll take future cases. If they don't, that locks up bidens "victory" and says they don't want anything to do with it.
I don't know if they'll grant this case writ, but it'll be telling
No, this is a different case. This is about the PA Constitution limiting absentee voting and would need to be modified to allow the type of election they just did. The legislators tried to amend the PA Constitution, then dropped it, and made a law doing the same, while renaming absentee to mail-in voting or something like it.
The case you are referencing is about the PA Supreme Court changing the meaning of election day to mean 3 days after election day.
No, it is one legislator that won in this election, and one that didn't. This means the one that won in this election risk losing his seat to bring this suit, and he is doin it anyway.
Each state is different, but in the US House, the majority of the "passed by all members of the House"bills you see passed are passed on days the majority of the legislators are not there. We haven't been paying attention to these people, and they are just as lazy politically as e are.
now if the SCOTUS refuses to do a fucking thing to help us out then we can blame whoever is against us.
remember that if they completely refuse to hear the case and chicken out with unsigned/anonymous rejection letters that means ALL NINE JUSTICES betrayed us.
NO. You can bet your ass that Alito and Thomas are going to do the right thing. If the others reject it, you can’t blame the good guys. It will be public record, we can see who voted for what.
Well they ruled on that case in New York siding with the Bishop saying that the lockdowns can’t stop religious freedom and ACB was the deciding vote on that case.
good thing that parnell hasn't chickened out like the other people involved in this shitshow.
i wouldn't be surprised if rudy/jenna have been pressured by RINOs in DC and cuckservatives on talk radio to not file with the SCOTUS because the people on the right don't want us to hate thomas, alito, ACB, kavanaugh, and gorsuch in the event that they reject even to hear the POTUS' legal team in a bullshit 9-0 'unsigned/anonymous' rejection letter.
These are all separate lawsuits. Do you think Rudy/Kraken/Lin woods lawsuits, which are in various State courts, need to stop and just file them on the SCOTUS? That’s not how this works at all. We are all pissed off and rightfully so. We would be wise not to stab each other in the back until we know what we need to do.
When SCOTUS takes the case and favors Trump. Its safe to say we from then on know exactly how the rest of this attempt at treason will go. Doesn't mean not to keep fighting obviously, but it becomes a clear cut case once SCOTUS rules for trump, that Trump will remain President and it will become apparent it is through SCOTUS that he does
Also...I'm gonna go onto reddit politics after SCOTUS rules for trump for the first case and enjoy the show. I'll have popcorn in one hand and porn on my second monitor. It'll be THAT good.
"Dec. 8 is the deadline for resolving election disputes at the state level. All state recounts and court contests over presidential election results are to be completed by this date."
You're correct. I don't know why you're getting downvoted. Whilst there's still paths beyond that, our safest bet is this one. I do, however, feel that the President needs to declare a State of Emergency and perhaps invoke Directive 51. Our republic will not survive if this is allowed to continue.
In simple terms, it grants the president full power over the entire federal government; allowing him to bypass congress, the judiciary etc.
i.e, President Trump could do whatever he wants.
I hope he goes nuclear with this. I am prepared for the complete shit show that will ensue. Everyday I am more and more disgusted at the level of fraud organization at every level of this process. From the media silence, the RINOS and other republicans working against him, USPS, UPS, election judge obstruction, ballot harvesting, destruction of ballots, and manipulation of voting through Dominion, it is absolutely incredible. Every day I get more and more concerned that we will not prevail as the obstruction and destruction of evidence snowballs.
This is great because the original lawsuit was profound. It's a god damn travesty that it was dismissed for "lack of standing" and other game playing bullshit. What it really was is "we're democrat judges and we don't care about the rights of republicans, which is indeed a violation of the first and 14th amendments. Hope it gets taken up because then we can hammer all these courts who bitched out when citizens had their cases die to "lack of standing."
Anyone know why Sean Parnell is the first to file with Scotus? Were his cases rejected in the lower courts faster? Seems like this case should have the President's legal team on it, but I am definitely not a lawyer.
It’s a more straightforward case than most. It’s a simple legal question on the surface: was Act 77 constitutional, or was it not? And if it’s not constitutional, what does that mean, legally speaking? This is something that can be decided in large part by SCOTUS without an evidentiary trial.
On the other hand, as it stands right now, the best thing SCOTUS could say for a lot of the other cases is that the trial court judge has to actually listen to evidence. SCOTUS can’t rule on fraud—which is a factual issue (did fraud occur here or not)—without evidence in the record. And no judge has (yet) issued an opinion after looking at the factual record.
Because no case has been dismissed on the merits (i.e. after hearing the evidence) yet. Most of the big cases have been the victims of "motions to dismiss" because of a lack of standing or other procedural flaws. Normally SCOTUS will not review rulings on motions to dismiss because they are not rulings on the merits of any constitutional issue. The same is true of this Parnell case, but he makes a good case. However, the only remedy the SCOTUS can give is to send it back for a full hearing before the original judge. They can't themselves decide that Act 77 was illegal and throw out the mail-ins.
However, Parnell has asked SCOTUS for an injunction to stop the electoral process pending the SCOTUS' decision on whether to review the dismissal of his case. If he wins that, then it at least screws things up for a while, and sends a signal that there were problems with this election.
The only case that is actually currently before SCOTUS on the merits is Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar--but that case is about the late ballots in PA that were segregated. The briefing is finished at SCOTUS and they could decide any day if they will take up the case.
I cannot imagine this not being picked up by the Supreme Court. This is the most important election in our time. There is no way that the Supreme Court Justices don't know what is going on. One of the key things I keep going back to is how in the hell did Conservatives ride a Red Wave this election and the guy leading the charge loses? How? We have all been watching this since 11-3-20. The amount of evidence at this point is staggering. If the court doesn't save us then something is really fucked up.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD GET THIS PATRIOT A COAT! THATS 250,897 COATS HANDED OUT!
We are 40.2% of our goal to coat the 623,747 great people of Las Vegas, Nevada. Let's make sure everyone gets a coat in the United States! For every Centipede a coat, for every coat a Centipede! This bot was created by deviou
Hmm, I’m not sure this is a litmus test, and I personally wouldn’t read too much into a denial. There’s a very easy out for Alito and others here—that this is a Pennsylvania issue that doesn’t clearly implicate federal law. They may be looking for cases that clearly fall under the federal constitution. Those cases are a bit behind this one on the timeline.
That would seem very hard to justify. The brief makes a strong case that the PA court denied them their constitutional right to be heard in court.
The PA court said "sorry, you can't challenge the law before an election actually happens, because you haven't been harmed yet", then when the election happens and they challenge it, the court said "sorry, you can't challenge the law because you didn't file the challenge straight after the law was passed". It seems a pretty clear case.
Reading through this... I can't imagine there aren't many other states that rushed their absentee ballot laws, and they are in fact unconstitutional. Without researching, I'd still guess that it would be easy to flip another 7 house seats that were won with absentee ballots alone. So my question is,
WTF IS THE GOP ON THIS? WHY AREN'T THEY FIGHTING FOR EACH SEAT?
Trump just needs to go "Scorched Earth" soon and just start arresting everyone. Full psycho. I'll help if needed. Something about "enemies both foreign and domestic".
4 Justices are required to grant cert. There's Trump's 3 picks, and Thomas. Alito might be a deciding vote but he voted with the other 4 on the NY case, and Pennsylvania snubbed Alito on his orders to ballot separation.
How long does it usually take for the SCOTUS to vote on whether to accept the case? That is the first step and that cannot be taken for granted. They need 4 Justices to agree to hear the case.
Remember, the SCOTUS deadlocked 4-4 in October on whether to hear the Pennsylvania case allowing late ballots to be accepted.
Granted, Alito instructed PA to separate the late ballots if the case came up again. But the vote should not have been that close to begin with.
4-4 on whether to count ballots received AFTER Election Day. That should have been 8-0.
This is a different case than that of Trump's team asking legislature to take back their power, yes? So does that not happen or did they decide not to? This fucking legal shit is killing me.
Did anyone here see Dr. Steve Pieczenik claim that Biden is wearing an ankle bracelet now. He claims the boot is just to cover it. Not sure if this is true. But would be awesome if it is true.
That’s the key question, pede. They can do any number of things. Parnell is asking that the court nullify certification and either throw out the illegal ballots or direct the PA legislature to choose electors. But SCOTUS is not bound to these requests and can instead determine on its own what it thinks is fair.
They could easily rule that the PA court was wrong to dismiss the case, and send it back down to them with orders that they allow it to continue, and reinstating the original injunction against certification. That seems like the "least intrusive" ruling from SCOTUS' perspective.
it wouldnt look good next to a zoom call masturbator, give it a few minutes
It's very sticky now. Just like that guy's laptop.
i think toobin thought he was on chaturbate. i mean he is likely a pervert but he seriously got mixed up between a date with a camgirl and a work meeting.
"Camgirl"?
Seriously! I stopped the video when he tilted the camera down to show what he was working on. That told me everything I needed to know: girls ain't into repetitive close-ups of the "last chicken in the shop" getting strangled. Whomever Lubein' Toobin was online with was a gay male.
Wait there is an ACTUAL video of this??
I know I shouldn’t but I want to laugh and eat popcorn - where how can this be seen?
If I can handle Hunter dick I can handle this hilarious episode. I searched but couldn't find it.
You handled a crack heads dick?
Dude.
Where is that video I want to see the reactions
Riiiiiiiggggghhhhhtttt
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD GET THIS PATRIOT A BRICK! THAT'S 171506 BRICKS HANDED OUT!
We are at 24.31309859277% of our goal to BUILD THE WALL starting from Imperial Beach, CA to Brownsville, Texas! Let's make sure everyone gets a brick in the United States! For every Centipede a brick, for every brick a Centipede
no
I know, right? I’m glad someone said it -/
.... And it's stickied.
Or would it. 🤔
its still on the hot page but it was un-stickied a bit after this one got stickied...
https://thedonald.win/p/11Ql1mZ9Il/last-time-i-checked-cnns-chief-l/c/
You got your wish
Lol it's now stickied
They won't ignore it because all we need is 3 judges for them to have to hear it. And it will get fast tracked if Alito decides to do so since he is in charge of PA. So that's positive.
They'll hear cases. I don't know if they'll hear this one or not, but they will hear cases and will not wriggle out. It's unavoidable.
They don't have to actually rule on it themselves, they can reverse the dismissal and force the state SC to rule on the conditionality of the law. That's the way they wriggle out, the state supreme court overturns the law but stops short of reversing the outcome. That'll make it easier for the SCOTUS to stop short of throwing out all those votes.
I hope that's not the reality, an unconditional election should be tossed, but i don't have confidence that they have 5 votes to toss the election, I've been disappointed too many times by the court stopping short of how they should rule.
Kav will 100% be impeached in that scenario, ACB maybe. If they only but knew their jobs where also on the line.
So they are gonna pack the courts either way, because they're gonna steal the Georgia seats too and then Harris Biden have free reign to do anything they want.
It's ok, that's when 1776 commences.
I saw Sean Parnell on Tim Pool's show and it was pretty good. Sean seems like a great person, I hope he can beat the fraud
i'm glad tim pool has pretty much said 'fuck you' to all media. he pretty much is now agreeing with alex jones after that fuckery he did to AJ a few weeks ago.
i feel like he knows it already but he is kinda reluctant to say it directly, if you know what i mean. so that he doesnt get blocked or removed from YT, which is his primary source of income. but yeah...wednesday he will have matt (the former stats guy for president trumps previous campaign on his show), gonna be good
I mean, the banhammer has cucked 99% of youtube.
Tbh it's actually incredibly shocking that YouTube HAS NOT banned Tim yet.
Like he says shit on his show all the time that the deep state wants to suppress. The media doesn't even give a fuck who he is. He's just a redpill merchant that KEEPS growing.
Now he wants to pump up production further. The man is starting a chain of redpill pharmacies and stated today that he wants to start attacking things from a culture standpoint.
He now wants to BUILD new culture and make conservatism cool to normies. And he blatantly just said this in a video.
The fact that Big Tech hasn't unpersonned him given all of this, is shocking. It's like he's got a fucking force field around his content or something.
I think it's mostly because of his fencesitting. Tim is the most REGULAR person you will probably find in this country, more or less. Take the average of all of the political leanings back in 2000 or so, and you basically get Tim Pool.
He's talked about this directly before. He asked YouTube people and was told that he has fans within YouTube staff.
I personally find his fencesitting aggravating at times. But I recognize his dedication to his craft and his redpilling factory.
Yeah there's definitely a "guard" of employees who probably argue in favor of keeping him.
We need more good hearted people to infiltrate big tech and continue the trend. Not just for Tim, but for all sanity.
Big Tech needs to be "infiltrated" by 14" of throbbing American freedom.
A lot of good people wouldn't want to work at a big SV company because the culture is toxic to conservatives. I don't even respond to recruiters from these companies anymore.
I'll bite the bullet and take a shot at it if somebody can get me in the door. I've got my resume and I'll have my bachelor's degree in May.
The pay is good and it's basically a golden ticket to any other job from what I understand. Any normie company that sees FAANG on your resume will probably want you.
Tbh it's not a bad deal to go there for a couple years, gather dirt, drop your findings to Project Veritas, and then be on your way.
I do imagine it's VERY toxic though based on what I've seen come out of the Veritas investigations.
Crowder will get banned from YT before Pool does. Though honestly, if Biden somehow makes it in, I wouldn't be surprised to see both of them, plus Styx and many more banned almost immediately as YT at that point won't have to give a shit any longer (who's gonna do what to 'em?).
tim is still a faggot tho
I SECOND THAT
"There's gonna be a civil war guyz, but not really, I don't know man. If you like my content give me money."
Bald beanie bro can be based sometimes. I agree with a lot of what he says, just not the methods of getting there...
Wasn't he telling Trump supports a month ago to accept the results?
yes
Yes, he voted for Trump and didn't care at all that his own fucking vote wasn't worth shit in this fraudulent election. His flip-flopping is worse than his fence-sitting.
I THIRD THAT
He literally is shitting redpills on voter fraud, and having some neat conservatives on his IRL.
Right. Wayyyyy to many people trust Tim pool.
Yes! He is Tim Pool!
lol
Is this your apology to Alex?
I know it's the popular thing to hate on Tim Pool right now but he consistently brings on guests that MSM won't touch, and that by itself has great value. I keep watching for people like Sean Parnell, if nothing else.
I think a lot of folks here are just mad that he is and has always been a liberal, not a secret MAGA conservative like many hoped. But you know what? If every liberal was like Tim, America wouldn't nearly be in the mess it is right now.
Tim is the first few steps for many people out of the democratic muck. Hes no Bongino, but Tim serves a purpose. People move their ideas very slowly, especially dems. They need someone to hear who isn't hard right, you've got to ease information into their minds slowly. If a far righter says it a dem will outright dismiss the info. If the info given is too far from their current position they will dismiss it. Years and decades of brainwashing by the media along with cognitive dissonance makes it very difficult to reach a lot of people.
Tim is slow and cautious opposition. We need people like him.
There's a phrase in politics, the "loyal opposition". Tim would count as that. The traitors currently undermining this country are not.
Bongino is a shill tbh and not even a smart one. Bannon/Raheem/Maxey are far more intellectually stimulating for based news. That being said, prayers up for Dan as he went through round 2 of Chemo today.
Yep. Well it’s show time. I feel like they should at least give it cert. if they deny cert just to duck the controversy that would be pretty cuck. But I wouldn’t put it past some of these judges. Especially after how they slandered some of them it would be pretty remarkable that they just deny cert outright.
It gives me some pleasure if the thought of going before Justice Thomas gives Joe the willies.
Im worried like everyone other than alito Kavanaugh and thomas joining together to duck granting cert.
I hear Barack got the willies on the regular.
Got Slick Willy on the regular
Keep it up pede. It's a good post.
I agree. It’s a worthy flyer. Keep doing your part!
Hey man, I agree with u/sryservicesdown, it is a good post. Keep spreading it.
I agree. Keep at it. It's not spam.
It's a good message. Keep it up
You made it so! Good work, soldier.
I love your message. Please keep posting.
If our votes didn't count due to all these fraudulent procedures, how do you know an election happened?
OK real talk. what are the chances this gets accepted by the supreme court and, based on what evidence has been submitted or, based on the arguments that have been made by sean et. al, this case will be viewed favourably by justice alito? please anyone?
da case will prolly get heard for sure since its a stupid important constitutional matter. how da supremes will rule tho idk cause idk what lawsuit this.
We waz kangs
Sheeeiiit.
Thanks, homie
Ayo dawg, thanks for da analysis
100
Considering it is a constitutional argument, it is a strong argument. Not much evidence necessary. We'll have to see, though.
If they grant writ here, that's a good sign they'll take future cases. If they don't, that locks up bidens "victory" and says they don't want anything to do with it.
I don't know if they'll grant this case writ, but it'll be telling
then on to the final box!
We will not submit this country to the false song of globalism.
How does it work? Do all judges have to decide or is it up to one?
I’m asking because I have no idea and there are smarter people than me on this site.
4 judges must agree to take the case
How long will it take to decide on the writ?
Interesting. This is a big deal then and could be extremely telling.
Do we have a timeframe?
So ahhh what is a “grit” anyways?
Very good
This issue was already before the court and they were split 4-4. Now we have ACB.
No, this is a different case. This is about the PA Constitution limiting absentee voting and would need to be modified to allow the type of election they just did. The legislators tried to amend the PA Constitution, then dropped it, and made a law doing the same, while renaming absentee to mail-in voting or something like it.
The case you are referencing is about the PA Supreme Court changing the meaning of election day to mean 3 days after election day.
To avoid spamming the SC by everyone. There are special kinds of cases that get super accelerated through the court system known as election contests.
I believe the Governor and Secretary of State amended the law at the last minute, which is unconstitutional.
No, it is one legislator that won in this election, and one that didn't. This means the one that won in this election risk losing his seat to bring this suit, and he is doin it anyway.
Each state is different, but in the US House, the majority of the "passed by all members of the House"bills you see passed are passed on days the majority of the legislators are not there. We haven't been paying attention to these people, and they are just as lazy politically as e are.
fucking finally.
now if the SCOTUS refuses to do a fucking thing to help us out then we can blame whoever is against us.
remember that if they completely refuse to hear the case and chicken out with unsigned/anonymous rejection letters that means ALL NINE JUSTICES betrayed us.
then the real fun starts
NO. You can bet your ass that Alito and Thomas are going to do the right thing. If the others reject it, you can’t blame the good guys. It will be public record, we can see who voted for what.
Well they ruled on that case in New York siding with the Bishop saying that the lockdowns can’t stop religious freedom and ACB was the deciding vote on that case.
This is a really solid case IMO. straight up was act 77 good or not based on Pa's constitution.
the answer, clearly, is NO
Parnell is one of at least a half dozen Republicans running for house seats that I think actually won their race but were cheated.
It's Happening!!!!
Seriously.
IT'S HAAAAAAAPPENINNNNG
Hell. It's about damn time.
good thing that parnell hasn't chickened out like the other people involved in this shitshow.
i wouldn't be surprised if rudy/jenna have been pressured by RINOs in DC and cuckservatives on talk radio to not file with the SCOTUS because the people on the right don't want us to hate thomas, alito, ACB, kavanaugh, and gorsuch in the event that they reject even to hear the POTUS' legal team in a bullshit 9-0 'unsigned/anonymous' rejection letter.
These are all separate lawsuits. Do you think Rudy/Kraken/Lin woods lawsuits, which are in various State courts, need to stop and just file them on the SCOTUS? That’s not how this works at all. We are all pissed off and rightfully so. We would be wise not to stab each other in the back until we know what we need to do.
It’s all about to collapse. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are about to collapse
Hello Wisconsin!
When SCOTUS takes the case and favors Trump. Its safe to say we from then on know exactly how the rest of this attempt at treason will go. Doesn't mean not to keep fighting obviously, but it becomes a clear cut case once SCOTUS rules for trump, that Trump will remain President and it will become apparent it is through SCOTUS that he does
Also...I'm gonna go onto reddit politics after SCOTUS rules for trump for the first case and enjoy the show. I'll have popcorn in one hand and porn on my second monitor. It'll be THAT good.
We have 1 week till the safe harbor deadline. Time is impossible now because deepstate gop stalled and did nothing.
"Dec. 8 is the deadline for resolving election disputes at the state level. All state recounts and court contests over presidential election results are to be completed by this date." You're correct. I don't know why you're getting downvoted. Whilst there's still paths beyond that, our safest bet is this one. I do, however, feel that the President needs to declare a State of Emergency and perhaps invoke Directive 51. Our republic will not survive if this is allowed to continue.
We only have 6 days. If you're sitting around not doing anything, you're part of the problem. Call your State Legislators and GOP Chairs NOW. https://stopthesteal.us/search_legislators.cfm https://stopthesteal.us/rnc.cfm
What is Directive 51?
In simple terms, it grants the president full power over the entire federal government; allowing him to bypass congress, the judiciary etc. i.e, President Trump could do whatever he wants.
I hope he goes nuclear with this. I am prepared for the complete shit show that will ensue. Everyday I am more and more disgusted at the level of fraud organization at every level of this process. From the media silence, the RINOS and other republicans working against him, USPS, UPS, election judge obstruction, ballot harvesting, destruction of ballots, and manipulation of voting through Dominion, it is absolutely incredible. Every day I get more and more concerned that we will not prevail as the obstruction and destruction of evidence snowballs.
SEAN PARNELL, TAKE MY HIGH ENERGY!
SCOTUS has to accept this case, they had to wait until after the election to prove damage. Hopefully we get the favorable ruling i am expecting
Stacey Abrams if successful
nice
Here we go boys!
Good luck Sean Parnell
Game on brothers (and sisters)
It’s MAAM! How dare you, Xir.
With the amount of liberal circles i am around, I was actually concerned that this wasn't satire... Carry on pede lol
Did you just assume my gender?
The request for writ has been filed to Alito. This is excellent news, since he's the one who was trying to get PA to comply with his orders.
All we need is this one win... after we get our first EC win against a state, the entire house of cards will collapse.
Kek
Usually was the first thing I'd hear when I'd join a random game of domination where most of my teammates have already quit
This is great because the original lawsuit was profound. It's a god damn travesty that it was dismissed for "lack of standing" and other game playing bullshit. What it really was is "we're democrat judges and we don't care about the rights of republicans, which is indeed a violation of the first and 14th amendments. Hope it gets taken up because then we can hammer all these courts who bitched out when citizens had their cases die to "lack of standing."
Need more like him in congress!
Alito knows PA. He was born in Trenton, NJ and grew up a Phillies fan
Rock hard erection
Rock hard election
Thought this said “rock hard election”
Anyone know why Sean Parnell is the first to file with Scotus? Were his cases rejected in the lower courts faster? Seems like this case should have the President's legal team on it, but I am definitely not a lawyer.
It’s a more straightforward case than most. It’s a simple legal question on the surface: was Act 77 constitutional, or was it not? And if it’s not constitutional, what does that mean, legally speaking? This is something that can be decided in large part by SCOTUS without an evidentiary trial.
On the other hand, as it stands right now, the best thing SCOTUS could say for a lot of the other cases is that the trial court judge has to actually listen to evidence. SCOTUS can’t rule on fraud—which is a factual issue (did fraud occur here or not)—without evidence in the record. And no judge has (yet) issued an opinion after looking at the factual record.
Agreed, did he confer with them on strategy of doing it this way?
Because no case has been dismissed on the merits (i.e. after hearing the evidence) yet. Most of the big cases have been the victims of "motions to dismiss" because of a lack of standing or other procedural flaws. Normally SCOTUS will not review rulings on motions to dismiss because they are not rulings on the merits of any constitutional issue. The same is true of this Parnell case, but he makes a good case. However, the only remedy the SCOTUS can give is to send it back for a full hearing before the original judge. They can't themselves decide that Act 77 was illegal and throw out the mail-ins. However, Parnell has asked SCOTUS for an injunction to stop the electoral process pending the SCOTUS' decision on whether to review the dismissal of his case. If he wins that, then it at least screws things up for a while, and sends a signal that there were problems with this election.
The only case that is actually currently before SCOTUS on the merits is Republican Party of Pennsylvania v. Boockvar--but that case is about the late ballots in PA that were segregated. The briefing is finished at SCOTUS and they could decide any day if they will take up the case.
I am completely lost myself. Maybe somebody can help us out.
Keeping my fingers crossed for a positive outcome. For precedent and Sean Parnell.
Can someone translate what this means
This case is actually stronger than the Rudy Pa case if I’m being honest.
I cannot imagine this not being picked up by the Supreme Court. This is the most important election in our time. There is no way that the Supreme Court Justices don't know what is going on. One of the key things I keep going back to is how in the hell did Conservatives ride a Red Wave this election and the guy leading the charge loses? How? We have all been watching this since 11-3-20. The amount of evidence at this point is staggering. If the court doesn't save us then something is really fucked up.
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD GET THIS PATRIOT A COAT! THATS 250,897 COATS HANDED OUT!
We are 40.2% of our goal to coat the 623,747 great people of Las Vegas, Nevada. Let's make sure everyone gets a coat in the United States! For every Centipede a coat, for every coat a Centipede! This bot was created by deviou
Hmm, I’m not sure this is a litmus test, and I personally wouldn’t read too much into a denial. There’s a very easy out for Alito and others here—that this is a Pennsylvania issue that doesn’t clearly implicate federal law. They may be looking for cases that clearly fall under the federal constitution. Those cases are a bit behind this one on the timeline.
That would seem very hard to justify. The brief makes a strong case that the PA court denied them their constitutional right to be heard in court.
The PA court said "sorry, you can't challenge the law before an election actually happens, because you haven't been harmed yet", then when the election happens and they challenge it, the court said "sorry, you can't challenge the law because you didn't file the challenge straight after the law was passed". It seems a pretty clear case.
Reading through this... I can't imagine there aren't many other states that rushed their absentee ballot laws, and they are in fact unconstitutional. Without researching, I'd still guess that it would be easy to flip another 7 house seats that were won with absentee ballots alone. So my question is,
WTF IS THE GOP ON THIS? WHY AREN'T THEY FIGHTING FOR EACH SEAT?
Sean is a solid guy but he's facing a mountain of corruption and a likely deeply compromised Supreme Court.
Is there another link to view the document? I don’t a have an Adobe account and would prefer not creating one. Thanks!
Trump just needs to go "Scorched Earth" soon and just start arresting everyone. Full psycho. I'll help if needed. Something about "enemies both foreign and domestic".
4 Justices are required to grant cert. There's Trump's 3 picks, and Thomas. Alito might be a deciding vote but he voted with the other 4 on the NY case, and Pennsylvania snubbed Alito on his orders to ballot separation.
How long does it usually take for the SCOTUS to vote on whether to accept the case? That is the first step and that cannot be taken for granted. They need 4 Justices to agree to hear the case.
Remember, the SCOTUS deadlocked 4-4 in October on whether to hear the Pennsylvania case allowing late ballots to be accepted.
Granted, Alito instructed PA to separate the late ballots if the case came up again. But the vote should not have been that close to begin with.
4-4 on whether to count ballots received AFTER Election Day. That should have been 8-0.
This is a different case than that of Trump's team asking legislature to take back their power, yes? So does that not happen or did they decide not to? This fucking legal shit is killing me.
Separate approach. If the legislators did their jobs and appointed trump electors (or even sent none) we wouldn’t have to also do a legal approach.
Did anyone here see Dr. Steve Pieczenik claim that Biden is wearing an ankle bracelet now. He claims the boot is just to cover it. Not sure if this is true. But would be awesome if it is true.
KEK. I doubt the fuck out of this but OMG can you imagine.
You know what to do, The Dark Winter.
Truge if Hue.
Stacy Abrams if true
If SCOTUS rules in favor of Parnell, what happens?
That’s the key question, pede. They can do any number of things. Parnell is asking that the court nullify certification and either throw out the illegal ballots or direct the PA legislature to choose electors. But SCOTUS is not bound to these requests and can instead determine on its own what it thinks is fair.
I would like to know more as well. I would think it sets a precedence for future cases to be heard.
They could easily rule that the PA court was wrong to dismiss the case, and send it back down to them with orders that they allow it to continue, and reinstating the original injunction against certification. That seems like the "least intrusive" ruling from SCOTUS' perspective.
Hey SCOTUS, if you want to stop our country from being overthrown by Communists and owned by China, now would be the time.
Good luck Shannon!