They're saying the narrative should be to imply that the US was more vulnerable to terrorist attacks because of the month long uncertainty of the election result of Bush vs Gore, and that is why 9/11 happened 10 months later. They want people to think that Trump's refusal to concede is making us vulnerable to another attack, to scare us into disregarding what he says.
Seriously bothered me in the other thread where the top comment was implying that "they" caused 9/11 due to the 2000 election. Does absolutely nothing for the movement and makes TD even more paranoid, especially when her comment is implying what you are saying: she feels compelled to not stir the hornets nest of news, so that Biden can "focus" on national security issues. It's obvious she is taking this seriously.
Larpers are just as bad as sky fallers just as bad as paranoid mongrels looking for morsels of information to turn into tin foil hat material.
Agree. His not bombing Iran for the drone bull shit and just schwacking Soleimani was a stroke of genius. It's just obvious what the establishment wants.
Trump is not Bush. He's not going to get bombed by Saudi Arabians living in Pakistan and then bomb Afghanistan and Iraq. He will glassify our enemies. Bet on it.
Maybe, just my $0.02. I don't think it is a stretch though considering all the pro middle eastern wars people Biden's floating in his cabinet. These establishment people like America in the middle east... Thinking they'd find a way to get us back in there full speed ahead and blame Trump doesn't seem like a stretch "too far" for me. He's the President of Peace - they have to tarnish that. I think Trump will win though so it's all good.
They're saying the narrative should be to imply that the US was more vulnerable to terrorist attacks because of the month long uncertainty of the election result of Bush vs Gore, and that is why 9/11 happened 10 months later. They want people to think that Trump's refusal to concede is making us vulnerable to another attack, to scare us into disregarding what he says.
Yup I can follow that as well.
Seriously bothered me in the other thread where the top comment was implying that "they" caused 9/11 due to the 2000 election. Does absolutely nothing for the movement and makes TD even more paranoid, especially when her comment is implying what you are saying: she feels compelled to not stir the hornets nest of news, so that Biden can "focus" on national security issues. It's obvious she is taking this seriously.
Larpers are just as bad as sky fallers just as bad as paranoid mongrels looking for morsels of information to turn into tin foil hat material.
It's fn disgusting, CNN are going down
POTUS won't fall for this.
Agree. His not bombing Iran for the drone bull shit and just schwacking Soleimani was a stroke of genius. It's just obvious what the establishment wants.
Yep, another war.
The Democrats coordinated and set up 9/11 as revenge.
Democrats are like the jealous, bi-polar bitch girlfriend who tries to kill you when you're out walking your dog.
Of course, Trump will win this thing, so it doesn't matter. But, it is subtle like a brick through a window what the establishment wants to do.
Trump is not Bush. He's not going to get bombed by Saudi Arabians living in Pakistan and then bomb Afghanistan and Iraq. He will glassify our enemies. Bet on it.
If we can resolve this with only 5,000 dead, let's go baby. 9-11 was child's play compared to the fire being flirted with.
Im worried it will be a real bioweapon.
That is 100% what they were saying. We know their playbook now.
That’s really a stretch
Maybe, just my $0.02. I don't think it is a stretch though considering all the pro middle eastern wars people Biden's floating in his cabinet. These establishment people like America in the middle east... Thinking they'd find a way to get us back in there full speed ahead and blame Trump doesn't seem like a stretch "too far" for me. He's the President of Peace - they have to tarnish that. I think Trump will win though so it's all good.