But their website says that unapproved proposals are watermarked as just that to show a pending status and when they are approved that watermark is removed as the update. The actual physical signature isn't uploaded, I imagine for security reasons. I could be wrong but here is their own documentation on their procedures. Read the very last statement.
"The proposed order can be edited by the judge or court commissioner prior to signing.
When the order is approved and signed, the proposed watermark is removed. An email is sent to all eNotice parties with the signed order."
Again, I could be TOTALLY wrong so approach optimism with caution.
But their website says that unapproved proposals are watermarked as just that to show a pending status and when they are approved that watermark is removed as the update. The actual physical signature isn't uploaded, I imagine for security reasons. I could be wrong but here is their own documentation on their procedures. Read the very last statement.
"The proposed order can be edited by the judge or court commissioner prior to signing. When the order is approved and signed, the proposed watermark is removed. An email is sent to all eNotice parties with the signed order."
Ok so both sides sumbit an order for relief they want granted and in some cases the judge grants the order as is and can then just sign the one from the side he wants to grant...other times he can grant parts of the order request...in that case he has to draft the order without the parts hes not granting
But their website says that unapproved proposals are watermarked as just that to show a pending status and when they are approved that watermark is removed as the update. The actual physical signature isn't uploaded, I imagine for security reasons. I could be wrong but here is their own documentation on their procedures. Read the very last statement.
"The proposed order can be edited by the judge or court commissioner prior to signing. When the order is approved and signed, the proposed watermark is removed. An email is sent to all eNotice parties with the signed order."
But their website says that unapproved proposals are watermarked as just that to show a pending status and when they are approved that watermark is removed as the update. The actual physical signature isn't uploaded, I imagine for security reasons. I could be wrong but here is their own documentation on their procedures. Read the very last statement.
"The proposed order can be edited by the judge or court commissioner prior to signing. When the order is approved and signed, the proposed watermark is removed. An email is sent to all eNotice parties with the signed order."
Just a reminder, Trump already won. Now he's trying to unsteal the election from Biden.
But their website says that unapproved proposals are watermarked as just that to show a pending status and when they are approved that watermark is removed as the update. The actual physical signature isn't uploaded, I imagine for security reasons. I could be wrong but here is their own documentation on their procedures. Read the very last statement.
Wicourts.gov/ecourts/efilecircuit/docs/filepropsedorder.pdf
"The proposed order can be edited by the judge or court commissioner prior to signing. When the order is approved and signed, the proposed watermark is removed. An email is sent to all eNotice parties with the signed order."
Again, I could be TOTALLY wrong so approach optimism with caution.
Thats exactly what I read. Can any pede confirm this ?
That’s just the request Pede.
Not signed, no date.
But their website says that unapproved proposals are watermarked as just that to show a pending status and when they are approved that watermark is removed as the update. The actual physical signature isn't uploaded, I imagine for security reasons. I could be wrong but here is their own documentation on their procedures. Read the very last statement.
Wicourts.gov/ecourts/efilecircuit/docs/filepropsedorder.pdf
"The proposed order can be edited by the judge or court commissioner prior to signing. When the order is approved and signed, the proposed watermark is removed. An email is sent to all eNotice parties with the signed order."
Ok so both sides sumbit an order for relief they want granted and in some cases the judge grants the order as is and can then just sign the one from the side he wants to grant...other times he can grant parts of the order request...in that case he has to draft the order without the parts hes not granting
But their website says that unapproved proposals are watermarked as just that to show a pending status and when they are approved that watermark is removed as the update. The actual physical signature isn't uploaded, I imagine for security reasons. I could be wrong but here is their own documentation on their procedures. Read the very last statement.
Wicourts.gov/ecourts/efilecircuit/docs/filepropsedorder.pdf
"The proposed order can be edited by the judge or court commissioner prior to signing. When the order is approved and signed, the proposed watermark is removed. An email is sent to all eNotice parties with the signed order."
Good catch. We'll find out tomorrow.
If this is the first domino to fall, I will be very, very excited.
But their website says that unapproved proposals are watermarked as just that to show a pending status and when they are approved that watermark is removed as the update. The actual physical signature isn't uploaded, I imagine for security reasons. I could be wrong but here is their own documentation on their procedures. Read the very last statement.
Wicourts.gov/ecourts/efilecircuit/docs/filepropsedorder.pdf
"The proposed order can be edited by the judge or court commissioner prior to signing. When the order is approved and signed, the proposed watermark is removed. An email is sent to all eNotice parties with the signed order."
idk if trump wins it just yet, but i think this is more about taking it away from biden.. i could be wrong
Well it is just an order for the courts, but line three does suggest making Trump the officially certified winner.