posted ago by Throwaway_Test
+70 / -0
Barrett referred to illegal alien invaders as "undocumented people" or similar. She then asked something about how to deal with those that have been in the country for twenty years. You get the idea. Does anyone have any information on this?
Barrett referred to illegal alien invaders as "undocumented people" or similar. She then asked something about how to deal with those that have been in the country for twenty years. You get the idea. Does anyone have any information on this?
Women have always been led more easily by their emotions, Amy Barrett is no different.
The fact that she adopted kids from Haiti is not a clear sign of her views on the matter, then I wonder what it is. The signs were there, from the beginning.
The emotions thing is kind of true but idk why your making out adopting kids from Haiti as some kind of a bad thing..
It’s a sign of white guilt liberalism. Lots of white kids in america need adopting, why did she feel the need to go help another country’s children instead of AMERICA FIRST?
Maybe because she felt that the kids in Haiti needed more help? Idk.
Proves that she is not America First.
It's a sign, of where you stand politically on the matter. Never said it's a bad thing or not.
On what matter?
On immigration. Which in this particular case translates into considering 'undocument people' in the census counting.
Ah I see
Why adopt at all? She has kids already. Let those who can’t have children adopt
And remember the last guy who had adopted kids from another country on the Supreme Court?
Really obnoxious assumptions here and in the comments below about it. We don’t know why she adopted Haitians. Perhaps she had a life changing experience there. Perhaps they are relatives of a close friend. Perhaps she recognized children from third world countries are severely more disadvantaged than American kids in the foster system, which is saying a lot. It is bullshit to judge her intelligence/rationality based on this and assume it means she’s “soft” on immigration. All it shows is that she supports legal immigration (Americans adopting kids makes those kids legally citizens). Women and men can respond equally emotional to things - women tend to respond more with sympathy to certain issues and men tend to respond more viscerally/combatively to other types of issues ie men on this forum when confronted with liberal arguments tend to feel angry/combative while women will be more calm and empathetic, but a woman might respond more emotionally when arguing with a husband over having the in laws over while he will just be calm about it. Your sexism is obnoxious here and it’s one of the many reasons MAGA is denounced by liberals for being bigoted and sexist. Stop giving them ammo and making us look bad.
You count on the CENSUS and he doesn’t. That’s all.
If you read the document, you will see she is not 'caving'. The Law is clear, there is no statute of limitations on illegal aliens. What I found disturbing is that "they" usually don't count foreign diplomats in a census, even if they've been here 20 years. Usually? As in, not every time, but they have been counted in the past?
As for women being led more by emotions...as a woman, I can agree to a small degree, but as a woman I also can see the right and wrong of something. I will stand for the right every time. Not every woman can have "Karen" attached to their mindset.
This should be #1 reply to this post. First Barr now Barrett. Getting pretty obvious people are desperate to paint anyone that might be useful in confirming Trump's win as traitors. Hold the fucking line and don't listen to the bullshit. He wouldn't have picked her if she didn't have the guts to stick it out
Thank you so much!!!
I brought this concern up. I was told by TDW to shut my mouth.
Everyone kept talking about how she’d be good for 1A and religious freedom issues and abortion. And so far she seems to have rules in our favor on those issues. But lots of the judges on the SCOTUS short list would rule in favor of those things, and there’s not much she can really do about abortion at this point anyway. I suspected she would betray us on immigration, and while she hasn’t yet, I know it’s coming.
Not a legal pede but I don't get this type of bullshit. I imagine almost every country in the world has some portion of its population that is illegal but why should that entitle them to the same rights as citizens? If they are here, okay, that's one thing but they should be allowed to be included in a census that determines the number of representatives a state has and they shouldn't be allowed to vote either.
All illegal pedes who hold the line for the President should immediately be granted citizenship! :)
I'm afraid I must disagree. The problem is: they're illegal. Therefore they will hold the line for ANYONE doing them favors.
So they support the president, that's fine. But they do not support the country, via the fact they have not taken the steps to get citizenship.
Sorry, but nope. They get no freebies for doing what any good citizen should do, which is support the president and support the rule of law.
I would recommend an 'American Foreign Legion' copycating the French Foreign Legion.
If yr an illegal and you serve for 3 years as a component in the U.S Army, via an 'American Foreign Legion' then you automatically get granted full U.S citizenship status after 3 years service. This can be sooner if yr injured in a conflict, fighting for the U.S.
agreed, with the notable exception to those who enlist in armed forces and swear allegiance to the Constitution.
Uhhhhhb no
Saltflake claims he’s not a legal pede!
I worked the census this year and there is not really a way to figure out who is here illegally. We didn't ask for id or papers.
It's hilarious that for all things an ID is required except for voting or to count the citizens of your country. Banana Republic.
You can't end Birthright citizenship via SCOTUS. It's a right granted by the constitution, 14th Amendment. SCOTUS is not there to make laws, or break laws, they are there to enforce it. (She said this very clearly at her confirmation hearing)
The only way to get rid of birth right citizenship is through congress following the process set forth to amend the constitution, even then there are limitations on what congress can do when they are amending it. OR Have a constitutional convention
Not entirely true. SCOTUS could rule on what the intent of birthright citizenship and the 14A means. Which is how we ended up with this situation where anchor babies are a thing. The 14A was originally put in place to keep native Americans from declaring citizenship of both their tribes and America. It was never intended to allow illegal alien criminal scumbags from coming here and dropping s baby.
That part, I agree. SCOTUS could rule on the meaning and definition of 14th amendment and exclude anchor babies from it. However, it will open up a whole new can of worms
Idk anything about ACB. But, as a conservative woman, my perspective is that a lot of conservative women want to be nice. As in, she’s conservative, but she’s not out there trying to be a hardass. I guess it has to do with women being more compassionate and motherly. Idk I’m the sort of woman that would be compassionate and motherly toward her own kids, but a hardass toward other people and on the issue. Maybe ACB is just the overall motherly type. Hopefully it doesn’t negatively impact her ruling though.
Edit: if I recall, she said during her confirmation hearing that she and her family cried when George Floyd got shot. She has Haitian kids, so she is sensitive to racism. So idk how she will rule on racism-related stuff (I mean, on stuff that the liberal media will try to paint as racist). Just saying she may not be “TheDonald-pilled” on all issues.
Oops yeh I think she said when GF died. Sorry I get all the different cases confused sometimes. Yeh I thought crying was pretty excessive too for someone who’s not family.
She also emasculated her husband on lIve TV. she’s another RINO and I said so from The beginning.
What did she say? I don’t remember.
I forget her exact words, but she made a big deal about her husband being the better cook snd better at laundry and better at babysitting the kids. Then she said something along the lines of him being a better mother than her
But she said he’s better than her at all those things. I understood that more as her distancing herself from the sort of stay at home mom conservative woman image. I didn’t know a man would take that as like an insult though.
Why would a conservative distance themselves from appearing conservative 🤔
Probably bc she knew she would be criticized for being too conservative lol. But yeh liberals shouldn’t criticize conservative women for being stay at home moms. At the same time conservative stay at home moms shouldn’t criticize women who have jobs. Not all women who have jobs are power hungry careerist feminists. What if a woman just didn’t find a husband?
I’ve never really heard conservative women scoff at liberal career women like that. Granted, conservative women don’t get the same platform as career liberal women do (let’s be real, will cnn/msnbc ever have such a woman on their show? Never).
Thanks for the response! Barrett does seem sketchy, given what you have said :-(((((((((((((((
I don’t think she’s sketchy overall. Just may not be as conservative as people on this board would like with regard to race related stuff.
If they haven’t been here 20 years, why are they still here?!
You mean dreamers...
It does say any person, not any citizen. I geuss being a contextualist is a double edged sword?