Anyone know what the penalty of breaking this would be? Want to start getting lawyers prepped for this and I'm in a state with a shitty blue strangle hold on it.
UNESCO is the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
They could vote for a resolution condemning the US for violating people’s rights by forcing people to be vaccinated against their will, but let’s be serious - why would they do that when they will all be trying to vaccinate people against their will too?
Except it isnt an experiment or study which is exactly what this dictates. Also medical treatment is forced on people all the time and no one cares. It's usually mental health treatment but even so.
Employment is the big problem here... I could say a solid “fuck you” to airlines and enjoy our beautiful country by car for the rest of my life, but I can’t do that to my income
Consent can be withdrawn without disadvantage or prejudice; unless of course they want to be using the same logic as nazi’s. Literally the same logic as nazi’s.
Think of it this way; after calling us nazi’s; we can now call them nazi’s and prove it.
Nah, they aren't 'forcing' you to do it. It'll just be a condition of your employment, travel, and ability to live in society.
“Consent ... may be withdrawn by any person for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice”
Condition of employment/travel/entering a business sounds an awful lot like “disadvantage and prejudice”
Anyone know what the penalty of breaking this would be? Want to start getting lawyers prepped for this and I'm in a state with a shitty blue strangle hold on it.
I don’t think any of this is binding.
UNESCO is the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
They could vote for a resolution condemning the US for violating people’s rights by forcing people to be vaccinated against their will, but let’s be serious - why would they do that when they will all be trying to vaccinate people against their will too?
IANAL though.
The UNESCO charter is not a legally enforceable document. As far as I have been able to find it has not been ratified by any national government.
So it’s a strong moral argument. Legal arguments will need other foundations.
Except it isnt an experiment or study which is exactly what this dictates. Also medical treatment is forced on people all the time and no one cares. It's usually mental health treatment but even so.
True, it’s also UN which is laughable non binding bullshit.
If they actually try this, I will be getting into the forging business - I bet fake covid IDs will sell for bank!
Employment is the big problem here... I could say a solid “fuck you” to airlines and enjoy our beautiful country by car for the rest of my life, but I can’t do that to my income
Ask about liability for adverse reactions.
If work is compelling you to take the vaccine then the adverse reaction should be a work related injury.
Which begs another question: will they threaten S.S. cheques for retired/seniors, take the 'shot' or no money?
Consent can be withdrawn without disadvantage or prejudice; unless of course they want to be using the same logic as nazi’s. Literally the same logic as nazi’s.
Think of it this way; after calling us nazi’s; we can now call them nazi’s and prove it.