If you applied this over the entire county, you'd have to flip 25% to make up the difference. I don't care how small your sample size is—it's not going to upscale twelve and a half times.
They provide a point of reference for data extrapolation
There was a 3% swing in duplicated ballots in maricopa. We can thus extrapolate that data across all duplicated ballots, statewide. This puts trump, at or near Biden. We can also likely extrapolate that data across all votes, and in fact we know dominion machines switched 2% across the board.
This is far more than enough to close a 10k vote gap, by literally 10s of thousands of votes.
It’s almost 1 PM, when are you planning to turn your brain on today?
We can also likely extrapolate that data across all votes
This is where your data extrapolation stops working. There is no reason to correlate a 3% swing in duplicated ballots with a 3% swing in regular ballots—those are independent statistics. You could get me to agree that the 3% among 20,000 in Maricopa extends statewide, but while they absolutely cheated in other ways, this data offers us no way to demonstrate or extrapolate that with cured ballots alone. Besides that, there's no good reason to be rude.
There are only 20,000 duplicated ballots in Maricopa County. The total possible swing is much less than Biden's margin of victory.
Google search “what is a sample size?”
If you applied this over the entire county, you'd have to flip 25% to make up the difference. I don't care how small your sample size is—it's not going to upscale twelve and a half times.
So let me explain what sample sizes are:
They provide a point of reference for data extrapolation
There was a 3% swing in duplicated ballots in maricopa. We can thus extrapolate that data across all duplicated ballots, statewide. This puts trump, at or near Biden. We can also likely extrapolate that data across all votes, and in fact we know dominion machines switched 2% across the board.
This is far more than enough to close a 10k vote gap, by literally 10s of thousands of votes.
It’s almost 1 PM, when are you planning to turn your brain on today?
This is where your data extrapolation stops working. There is no reason to correlate a 3% swing in duplicated ballots with a 3% swing in regular ballots—those are independent statistics. You could get me to agree that the 3% among 20,000 in Maricopa extends statewide, but while they absolutely cheated in other ways, this data offers us no way to demonstrate or extrapolate that with cured ballots alone. Besides that, there's no good reason to be rude.