Note how the "duplicate ballots" were defined in the video. They were defined as physical ballots that were not readable/differentiable. This is not the same as the massive number of digital "duplicate ballots" produced from double-scanned and double-counted copies of readable/differentiable physical ballots for Cheater Joe 8-10 times, according to eyewitness.
I have no sympathy for her, she knows what is at stake and her stance shows pure ambivalence to the situation. I consider myself libertarian-conservative leaning, and I wouldn't vote for her, if she actually gave a damn she would have tried to work with Trump to get her objectives passed.
That said, her and the other third parties were used as a vote bank during the tallying process, she lost massive numbers of votes in the swing states, we observed this in the live data feeds. There's a guy that went over this in one of the findings released, it discusses how her votes were artificially kept at 2%.
I can't for the life of me remember his name, but one of our other pedes might have the link.
It was a little bit intended as a joke. But if I remember correctly the Indian lady in Michigan hearing (or who was it?) said that a 3rd party candidate lost a vote to Biden too. Overall, those numbers are probably way smaller then Trump's like 1/50th in size or something.
Extrapolating, that's a 3 point difference.
Let's look at the numbers.
The reported results are:
So, 3% of 3385294 (1,672,143 + 1,661,686 + 51,465) is 101558. Add half that to Trump and take half away from Biden and you have:
This is 3% of duplicated ballots, not all ballots. There are only 20,000 of those, as far as I know.
That's just Maricopa county.
But again this shows that the fraud only seems to helps Biden hmmm
Maricopa is 62% of AZ's population. But yes, it's more proof.
That is only the examination of the tip of iceberg
Note how the "duplicate ballots" were defined in the video. They were defined as physical ballots that were not readable/differentiable. This is not the same as the massive number of digital "duplicate ballots" produced from double-scanned and double-counted copies of readable/differentiable physical ballots for Cheater Joe 8-10 times, according to eyewitness.
Your objection that this particular question only applies to duplicated ballots is correct.
Where did you source that 20,000 number?
https://www.azmirror.com/2020/11/30/judge-allows-ward-to-examine-handful-of-ballots-in-attempt-to-overturn-election/
WINNING!
AZ is a red state.
Yes we are!
math is racist bro
"Math is hard" - Teen Talk Barbie circa 1992
You didn't bother calculating for Poor Jo Je.
I have no sympathy for her, she knows what is at stake and her stance shows pure ambivalence to the situation. I consider myself libertarian-conservative leaning, and I wouldn't vote for her, if she actually gave a damn she would have tried to work with Trump to get her objectives passed.
That said, her and the other third parties were used as a vote bank during the tallying process, she lost massive numbers of votes in the swing states, we observed this in the live data feeds. There's a guy that went over this in one of the findings released, it discusses how her votes were artificially kept at 2%. I can't for the life of me remember his name, but one of our other pedes might have the link.
It was a little bit intended as a joke. But if I remember correctly the Indian lady in Michigan hearing (or who was it?) said that a 3rd party candidate lost a vote to Biden too. Overall, those numbers are probably way smaller then Trump's like 1/50th in size or something.