How good of a fucking expert are they if they say it "may" be a felony, or maybe how fucked up is the law written? The law should be clear on if it is a crime or not, one reason the "hate crime/speech" junk is bullshit, there is no clear definition it is just something they can use if they want to get you. If so called experts can't figure out if something is illegal, then the law is written poorly, or they are lying.
The FBI framed and tried to ruin Gen Flynn, you dont need to actually break the law for the swamp to make an example out of you, which is what this threat is meant to imply. Its a shot across the bow for anyone that might shine a light on the DS. "We own Law Enforcement, and now they are coming for you"
It's the same inarticulate language of the "fact checking" additions that social media companies are giving us. "Multiple sources called this differently," "This claim is disputed," etc. Nobody wants to put stick their neck out or put their name on the line. Why couldn't CNN say "We believe this to be a felony"? Because they 1) have no idea, or 2) know it isn't. They're just posturing and leveling threats without actually having to be accountable.
What would you have given to be a fly on the wall while Zucker hears the now famous words ‘it’s James O’Keefe from Project Veritas, Ive been listening in for the past two months... ‘.
Defund the police I mean call the police, James’ is making me cry cry.
Also, how many people blew out their drinks while hearing this patriot? I’m raising my hand...
How good of a fucking expert are they if they say it "may" be a felony, or maybe how fucked up is the law written? The law should be clear on if it is a crime or not, one reason the "hate crime/speech" junk is bullshit, there is no clear definition it is just something they can use if they want to get you. If so called experts can't figure out if something is illegal, then the law is written poorly, or they are lying.
The FBI framed and tried to ruin Gen Flynn, you dont need to actually break the law for the swamp to make an example out of you, which is what this threat is meant to imply. Its a shot across the bow for anyone that might shine a light on the DS. "We own Law Enforcement, and now they are coming for you"
It's the same inarticulate language of the "fact checking" additions that social media companies are giving us. "Multiple sources called this differently," "This claim is disputed," etc. Nobody wants to put stick their neck out or put their name on the line. Why couldn't CNN say "We believe this to be a felony"? Because they 1) have no idea, or 2) know it isn't. They're just posturing and leveling threats without actually having to be accountable.
still want to know how cnn had a front row seat for the raid and arrest of Roger Stone.
What would you have given to be a fly on the wall while Zucker hears the now famous words ‘it’s James O’Keefe from Project Veritas, Ive been listening in for the past two months... ‘. Defund the police I mean call the police, James’ is making me cry cry. Also, how many people blew out their drinks while hearing this patriot? I’m raising my hand...
"The claim about this actually being a felony is disputed."- Learn more here.
If CNN got the Charlie Hebdo treatment, I wouldn't shed a single tear.
I wanted to not upvote....But thought I can salve my conscience. Take the upvote. Even though no one deserves the Religion of Peace treatment.
Again with the hypocrisy of the media! Rules for thee and not for me!