Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
YUGE! Thanks God they found this in such a small sample size. When they announced they were doing this, I was worried nothing would be found because of the size or "random selection" of the sample.
They need to look at every State in the Nation. I’m starting to be of the opinion that this entire Election needs to be overturned and thrown out and President Trump wins by Contingent. The entire Election is compromised due to the Democrats pushing mail in ballots. They wanted this shit show. They have to suffer the consequences of that decision. They compromised the vote and election integrity at every level therefore the Electoral votes must be thrown out and President Trump wins. Just my opinion for what it’s worth.
There are an estimated 20,000 duplicate ballots in Maricopa County alone. If the 100 that were picked out for audit by the corrupt officials that stole the election to begin with show a 2% change, imagine how many of the rest are likely fraudulent.
True, but this isn't the only case in Arizona. Besides, 3% out of a sample of 'random' ballots hand picked by corrupt election officials might end up being 60% when dealing with truly random ballots.
The current difference is ~11k votes, every little bit is impactful.
It’s not 600. If it was 600 changed then it’s actually a 1200 swing since you would have to deduct 600 from Biden and add 600 to Trump. That being said it’s still a start and good grounds for a full audit.
the bar as to what constitutes "enough" fraud to justify full audit, seems to be consistently set by courts and legislature as 'enough to potentially change results'.
So it actually does matter that this fraud found would not in fact be enough to flip that election.
GOP needs to push fast for a larger random sample to verify and use this mini audit to go after any other suspicious categories of ballots.
I agree 100%. I actually believe the hearing they conducted will help in getting this moving. It was time well spent. I think any objective person would say "alright, I'll give you some more room to audit" even if they keep it on a tight leash. Because, if more fraud is discovered, more doors open to look further.
We are holding the line. We do have to marshal our energy wisely but also celebrate every small thing that pushes us forward. They might be half steps, but we have started pushing back.
This type of behavior could have been causing over-votes which are then subject to manual inspection. Just marking ballots w/ a line on the biden bubble though being for Trump causes manual review where one can change the vote.
It's gonna get to the point, the entire nation, all 50 states are going to have to go into football stadiums and sorta all their ballots into 2 stacks. Don't even need to count them. Just pile them up, the highest stack wins. Trump's stack will hit the roof and Bidens will be in the basement.
Is there a logical explanation on how a vote for Trump got counted as a vote for Biden? A missed count could be a scan loader error, but a changed vote? How does a changed vote happen without external manipulation?
The issue is that these irregularities have not been explained, yet we are going ahead with certifying Biden anyway. What we want is a reasonable explanation, where you go oh that makes sense. The most reasonable explanation as of current is foul play and because the democrats are mainly ignoring all forms of irregularity, none of it gets explained in a reasoned fashion.
This is what the media is glossing over. We aren't misinformed. We aren't blindly following Trump's word like a cult. Let us alleviate our justified impression of this fraudulent election. I can't speak for all pedes but if from the start they had approached this as a bipartisan transparency audit which showed Trump did lose, the TDS was just that strong, I would respect the results with no issue.
Katie Hobbs come on down! you’ve won indefinite days and indefinite nights in sunny Guantanamo Bay! That’s right Katie you’ll be jetting off in style on an UNDISCLOSED MILITARY FLIGHT and whisked away to beautiful CAMP DELTA where you will relax between frequent beatings and waterboarding sessions by having your sleep interrupted every 15mins. Enjoy your stay Katie, you’ve earned it!
A duplicated ballot is supposed to exist in cases where the original ballot is damaged. For example, if the machine cannot read the original ballot because of the ink used to fill it out, or if you spill your coffee on the ballot, etc etc.
I can't wait for all this to blow sky high. All it will take is one state (I bet NV or AZ) to start falling and the rest of the teetering states like PA and WI will be close behind. This whole scam was built on a house of cards. Did they really think 74 million Americans were just going to take this up the bung hole? Pay off the media? Got news for the riggers, we're not sheep. Maybe your followers are but we're not. Come and take it fuck face.
I'd be curious the spoilage rate was particularly because this was pushed by the board of elections specifically on election day, when most republicans would have voted.
That right there should be cause for serious investigations.
And therefore were duplicated by an elections worker.
Observers have reported witnessing these worker duplications taking place at isolated tables without even a 2nd party signing off, let alone proper oversight by observers from both parties.
Are you gonna trust Democrat run operations to honestly transcribe the marks? 100% of the time? Just on their own integrity?
The dems will say its only 2 or only 100. but if its a truly random sample then it should reflect a decent amount of FUCKING ASSRAPING FRAUD to say the election cannot be certified or to call it for Trump
And there's even a question of how truly random the sample is. Is this one of the cleanest possible samples? Such a small size, it'd be quite possible for the real average to be anywhere up to, say, 10%, and this particular sample might just be one of the cleanest of the bunch at 2%. This absolutely requires full audit of all duplicate ballots, and THEN potentially of other ballots.
I think what makes this so important is that if there's a discrepancy between the original ballot and the one that's been "duplicated", that's a sign of serious fraud AT THE ELECTION SITE BY POLL WORKERS.
This is poll workers fucking with people's actual votes, on purpose.
I don't care if it's not enough to swing the balance - even if it is - if even just ONE FUCKING VOTE WAS SWITCHED THE WHOLE FUCKING THING NEEDS TO BE THROWN OUT
What's the margin of error for such a sample size? Seems a rather small sample, and how was it selected? The rigging was not evenly distributed across all counties. Wasn't Maricopa disproportionately responsible for most of it?
Even with that small sampling they found evidence of fraud. Arizonas results need to be tossed out. Same with all of the other states caught in this fraud and this needs to go to the house (where trump would win). But after all is said and done, we need to be arresting everyone that was in on this. People at dominion should leave the country now if they value their freedrom from being locked up.
McSally is a sellout like McCain, she ran to take the primary, but fine throwing the general. We should have learned from the last election in AZ that was stolen from us.
The overall goal is to TOSS OUT FAKE FRAUDULENT VOTES!!! if that can not be done and you know there is 100,000's of fraudulent votes.. then the election must be tossed out entirely... or you have absolute FAKE WINNERS.
That is a 600 vote gain if this is typical, but this is likely the smallest screwed with sample... Chances are he would gain thousands of votes if all 20,000 are looked at.
If that is the case, then the rest of the election has to be looked at or thrown out. Particularly if you do not find any situations where Biden votes were switched or dropped.
The directionality of the errors is also a major indicator of fraud. Consistent errors against the Trump vote are evidence of systemic bias... that such errors are expected is evidence of at least professional negligence and dereliction, but arguably fraudulent actions as well.
1 ballot deleted from Trump and 1 ballot switched from Trump to Biden equals a +3% margin change in favor of Trump.
This is a big fucking deal.
only for duplicate ballots though
Still a big deal. It gives a reason for a full audit.
YUGE! Thanks God they found this in such a small sample size. When they announced they were doing this, I was worried nothing would be found because of the size or "random selection" of the sample.
Same! God is good
I believe you can pay for a recount regardless of the margin, but if its <1% or something its free and automatic (depending on state).
Yep, this right here.
If they cheated for these types of ballots, they cheated elsewhere.
Full forensic audit of everything.
They need to look at every State in the Nation. I’m starting to be of the opinion that this entire Election needs to be overturned and thrown out and President Trump wins by Contingent. The entire Election is compromised due to the Democrats pushing mail in ballots. They wanted this shit show. They have to suffer the consequences of that decision. They compromised the vote and election integrity at every level therefore the Electoral votes must be thrown out and President Trump wins. Just my opinion for what it’s worth.
Starting? That's been my position from day 1.
This will be scotus decision
Agree.
I have an odd feeling, CA may actually have gone to trump.
I agree. I think it did. I hope at the end of all this that that is what is revealed. I think a lot of Blue States did.
There are an estimated 20,000 duplicate ballots in Maricopa County alone. If the 100 that were picked out for audit by the corrupt officials that stole the election to begin with show a 2% change, imagine how many of the rest are likely fraudulent.
3% change in this case. Trump lost net 3 votes, because one of the 2 ballots was flipped.
Ahh, good eye!
True, but this isn't the only case in Arizona. Besides, 3% out of a sample of 'random' ballots hand picked by corrupt election officials might end up being 60% when dealing with truly random ballots.
The current difference is ~11k votes, every little bit is impactful.
Exactly, this was a small sample. Need to go check all of them. NOW
It’s not 600. If it was 600 changed then it’s actually a 1200 swing since you would have to deduct 600 from Biden and add 600 to Trump. That being said it’s still a start and good grounds for a full audit.
It would be 200 deducted and 400 switched, so 1,000 vote difference back to Trump.
EDIT: Note that 1,000 votes is around 10% of the difference in AZ at the moment, so this is significant.
nigga how is that 1000 lmao
Reaching deep down inside of yourself, using all the judgement you can muster, do you really think this is a place to be calling people “nigga”?
-400 from Trump and +400 to Biden. Nigga.
-600 biden + 400 trump
merely speculation and extrapolation, they could find a huge trove of them if they do full audit
It is more 'confirmed election fraud' - this time by the State itself.....
Just toss it on the Arizona Vote Fraud Truck load - that is going to end up in the Supreme Court.
Just In: Arizona State Rep Says Enough Fraud Present to Invalidate the State’s Electoral Votes for Biden https://welovetrump.com/2020/12/01/just-in-arizona-state-rep-says-enough-fraud-present-to-invalidate-the-states-electoral-votes-for-biden/
Whether the numbers are high or low, it proves fraud. Full Audit Every state. If they dont have the envelopes and cant match sigs, then its time!!!!
It’s enough to justify a full audit - that’s what matters.
Maricopa is 62% of Arizona's population.
so we are not likely to get more than a thousand vote diff to current total from this?
Doesn't matter. If you find enough fraud there, you can easily justify a full audit of the vote
the bar as to what constitutes "enough" fraud to justify full audit, seems to be consistently set by courts and legislature as 'enough to potentially change results'.
So it actually does matter that this fraud found would not in fact be enough to flip that election.
GOP needs to push fast for a larger random sample to verify and use this mini audit to go after any other suspicious categories of ballots.
I agree 100%. I actually believe the hearing they conducted will help in getting this moving. It was time well spent. I think any objective person would say "alright, I'll give you some more room to audit" even if they keep it on a tight leash. Because, if more fraud is discovered, more doors open to look further.
Correct. I'd put a cap around 2k, unless we get lucky.
That's not to say it isn't important—it's a start and demonstrates fraud, but this isn't the thing that swings it.
Oh my guess is about 30%, since the 100 inspected were cherry picked to be legit (and even then they couldn't get clean).
i wouldnt be here if i didn't believe trump won, im just saying we need to stop getting too excited too quickly. its our biggest weakness atm.
We are holding the line. We do have to marshal our energy wisely but also celebrate every small thing that pushes us forward. They might be half steps, but we have started pushing back.
This type of behavior could have been causing over-votes which are then subject to manual inspection. Just marking ballots w/ a line on the biden bubble though being for Trump causes manual review where one can change the vote.
Iceberg witnessed above the waterline is not enough to sink the Titanic.
STAY THE COURSE
It's gonna get to the point, the entire nation, all 50 states are going to have to go into football stadiums and sorta all their ballots into 2 stacks. Don't even need to count them. Just pile them up, the highest stack wins. Trump's stack will hit the roof and Bidens will be in the basement.
Is there a logical explanation on how a vote for Trump got counted as a vote for Biden? A missed count could be a scan loader error, but a changed vote? How does a changed vote happen without external manipulation?
Agreed.** This is a big fucking deal.**
It doesn't. This is proof of either gross incompetence or fraud (or both).
we already know that he didn't lose legitimately
We already know he didn’t lose. Period.
The issue is that these irregularities have not been explained, yet we are going ahead with certifying Biden anyway. What we want is a reasonable explanation, where you go oh that makes sense. The most reasonable explanation as of current is foul play and because the democrats are mainly ignoring all forms of irregularity, none of it gets explained in a reasoned fashion.
This is what the media is glossing over. We aren't misinformed. We aren't blindly following Trump's word like a cult. Let us alleviate our justified impression of this fraudulent election. I can't speak for all pedes but if from the start they had approached this as a bipartisan transparency audit which showed Trump did lose, the TDS was just that strong, I would respect the results with no issue.
How many duplicate ballots were created to "correct" those filled out with Sharpies?
That's another issue entirely, and I believe the current answer is none.
I think it's pretty likely those are them. The sharpies make the ballots unreadable by the scanners, so they need to be duplicated
Katie Hobbs come on down! you’ve won indefinite days and indefinite nights in sunny Guantanamo Bay! That’s right Katie you’ll be jetting off in style on an UNDISCLOSED MILITARY FLIGHT and whisked away to beautiful CAMP DELTA where you will relax between frequent beatings and waterboarding sessions by having your sleep interrupted every 15mins. Enjoy your stay Katie, you’ve earned it!
Enjoy the soothing sounds of Baby Shark played on an infinite loop at 120db.
Omg stop
Sounds like you went to SARS school.
SERE school? Or has it been renamed now?
Isn't "duplicate ballots" even more of a problem?
Technically the term is duplicated ballot.
A duplicated ballot is supposed to exist in cases where the original ballot is damaged. For example, if the machine cannot read the original ballot because of the ink used to fill it out, or if you spill your coffee on the ballot, etc etc.
Oh, I would have called that "replaced." This brings up another question, what about ballots spoiled by Sharpiegate?
I do not know the answer to the great Sharpie question.
I believe that could also be an avenue for fraud in addition to the "for review" green button ballots
Or if you used a sharpie?
I can't wait for all this to blow sky high. All it will take is one state (I bet NV or AZ) to start falling and the rest of the teetering states like PA and WI will be close behind. This whole scam was built on a house of cards. Did they really think 74 million Americans were just going to take this up the bung hole? Pay off the media? Got news for the riggers, we're not sheep. Maybe your followers are but we're not. Come and take it fuck face.
I wish Kelli would have beaten McSally in 2018 primary. She is much better. Glad she is our warrior in AZ!
I'd be curious the spoilage rate was particularly because this was pushed by the board of elections specifically on election day, when most republicans would have voted.
That right there should be cause for serious investigations.
Trump won AZ
This proves it beyond reasonable doubt
Need a bigger sample size. 2 ballots wont convince anyone.
2 out of 100 is very alarming.
"duplicating a ballot" pretty clever way of cheating....
No, it means these are copies of ballots that were damaged or otherwise unreadable by the machine.
And therefore were duplicated by an elections worker.
Observers have reported witnessing these worker duplications taking place at isolated tables without even a 2nd party signing off, let alone proper oversight by observers from both parties.
Are you gonna trust Democrat run operations to honestly transcribe the marks? 100% of the time? Just on their own integrity?
Were the originals even examined for comparison?
-2% from Trump +2% to Biden
4% difference created.
Huge.
Treason.
The dems will say its only 2 or only 100. but if its a truly random sample then it should reflect a decent amount of FUCKING ASSRAPING FRAUD to say the election cannot be certified or to call it for Trump
Exactly.
2% error rate equating to a 3% margin difference, in a state where Biden "won" by less than 0.1% of the vote, is a really big deal.
And there's even a question of how truly random the sample is. Is this one of the cleanest possible samples? Such a small size, it'd be quite possible for the real average to be anywhere up to, say, 10%, and this particular sample might just be one of the cleanest of the bunch at 2%. This absolutely requires full audit of all duplicate ballots, and THEN potentially of other ballots.
I think what makes this so important is that if there's a discrepancy between the original ballot and the one that's been "duplicated", that's a sign of serious fraud AT THE ELECTION SITE BY POLL WORKERS.
This is poll workers fucking with people's actual votes, on purpose.
Send it to the top! Mods sticky for high energy, ignore for 10 years of bad luck.
WHo the fuck grabbed the initial ballots? LOL
Knowing the left they will say that 2 ballots don't change the outcome of the election
I love her energy. Dr. Ward is PISSED
If the MIBs heavily favored biden -- like 65 / 35, then just 2 being switched is a ~7% increase for Trump.
It took me a second wondering what Men In Black had to do with this.
Actually in Maricopa county alone there is statistical evidence of vote switching. The numbers could be large. https://twitter.com/home_obama/status/1334216098397339650
Does this open the door to examine all of the duplicated ballots? If so, its a good start
Fraud and trump did win the state. Makes more proof that we need paper ballots for all election. Fair
small sample size but that's ok we'll just have to audit them all
Interesting coincidence right?
YUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE
YUGE.
That is a 4 point swing. Disgusting.
Now verify that those 100 ballots belong to actual citizens who reside in AZ. That is, bring them one by one and take their fingerprints.
I don't care if it's not enough to swing the balance - even if it is - if even just ONE FUCKING VOTE WAS SWITCHED THE WHOLE FUCKING THING NEEDS TO BE THROWN OUT
Foot in the closing door... ??
That’s a 4 percent spread. 2 from Trump to 2 for Biden.
Why is every claim of election fraud disputed and by whom?
But there isn’t any widespread fraud! What a joke
SOMEOES GONNA GET A STERN LETTER!
What's the margin of error for such a sample size? Seems a rather small sample, and how was it selected? The rigging was not evenly distributed across all counties. Wasn't Maricopa disproportionately responsible for most of it?
Even with that small sampling they found evidence of fraud. Arizonas results need to be tossed out. Same with all of the other states caught in this fraud and this needs to go to the house (where trump would win). But after all is said and done, we need to be arresting everyone that was in on this. People at dominion should leave the country now if they value their freedrom from being locked up.
The big fat, festering pot of fraud. All obvious as hell.
Get some more ropes pedes.
Well well!
"This LOOKS LIKE this election was ATTEMPTED to be stolen from President Trump!"
"They're POTENTIALLY covering up fraud."
Ya Think?
YUGE!
Everyone please contact Dr. Ward with words of encouragement and urge other states to do the same.
In some states they were spoiling ballots so that they could be corrected by the special democrat staff
McSally is a sellout like McCain, she ran to take the primary, but fine throwing the general. We should have learned from the last election in AZ that was stolen from us.
The overall goal is to TOSS OUT FAKE FRAUDULENT VOTES!!! if that can not be done and you know there is 100,000's of fraudulent votes.. then the election must be tossed out entirely... or you have absolute FAKE WINNERS.
That isn't written clearly.
When I first read it I thought the 2 votes were erroneously given to Trump.
That is a 600 vote gain if this is typical, but this is likely the smallest screwed with sample... Chances are he would gain thousands of votes if all 20,000 are looked at.
If that is the case, then the rest of the election has to be looked at or thrown out. Particularly if you do not find any situations where Biden votes were switched or dropped.
The directionality of the errors is also a major indicator of fraud. Consistent errors against the Trump vote are evidence of systemic bias... that such errors are expected is evidence of at least professional negligence and dereliction, but arguably fraudulent actions as well.