7817
Comments (547)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
MichelleObamasBulge 1 point ago +1 / -0

This was an interesting read for me. Though I still think having more than one bank is a good idea. In what way would a central bank with these limited powers/function be better than an array of unrelated banks with the same powers/functions? Is the monopolistic aspect of a central bank not exactly what allows it to spin off into all these other behaviors? Wouldn’t a bank and currency abiding by a gold standard be more desirable than one that doesn’t?

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +1 / -0

In practice, it's not really notably better. In theory, you don't have to worry about regulating or monitoring a bunch of private for-profit enterprises, you just have a single entity that would, ostensibly, also be cheaper for its customers since they're the ones paying for it through taxes in the first place and there is no profit motive.