Just a math check. 1 VOTE was lost and the other Vote was changed. That results in a 3 vote change in the sample. Trump minus 2 and Biden plus 1 which should be applied to all duplicate ballots for an estimate of impact. A larger sample would be better, but other types of fraud would be added to this.
The largest Fraud is vote manipulation in large Democrat Cities by software. It is outright THEFT of the legitimate votes with an accompanying destruction of an audit trail. This alone should be sufficient ground to overturn the results as ILLEGITIMATE.
VOTE SWITCHING is a TWO VOTE IMPACT where stolen Trump votes and manufactured fictional Biden votes only have a SINGLE VOTE IMPACT. Every time a polling vote thief called out BIDEN when it should have said TRUMP was a two vote swing.
I'm not sure which state it was, but this process of creating a new ballot while Republican poll watchers were unable to observe the process sound like the process used for 100% Military Ballots for BIDEN.
this is so fucking dumb. access to 100 ballots after 3 weeks? And now we hit the 'jackpot' by finding 2 ballots in the batch because otherwise they would've said there's nothing wrong with anything. Do a full audit.
2% of duplicated ballots, of which there are 20,000 in Maricopa (which is 62% of Arizona's population). It's important, but it doesn't swing the state.
Type 1 voters were hard-line republican. Type 3 are swing. Type 5 are hard-line democrats. The bell-curve there is telling, considering it seems logical that most people who would choose undisclosed gender instead of male/female would be left-leaning. But according to the data, it's distributed equally among every type of voter. Makes no sense.
A little further....when he unpacked that data by age, he looked at the maximum # of U votes in any given precinct in AZ and he correlated that to the average # of votes per age group took place....the result was > 97% correlation. He's essentially saying that the number of Undisclosed gender voters in each precinct is almost the EXACT SAME percentage across nearly all precincts.
Um guys....I don't think that's how the math works. Not dooming or doubting 40k could have been flipped, but why are you extrapolating 100 randomly selected ballets for the entire state?
To be clear, this was a sample audit of DUPLICATED ballots. I haven't seen a number in the lawsuit, other than remarks that it was unusually high, but I'm quite confident that there are not 2M duplicated ballots.
Just a math check. 1 VOTE was lost and the other Vote was changed. That results in a 3 vote change in the sample. Trump minus 2 and Biden plus 1 which should be applied to all duplicate ballots for an estimate of impact. A larger sample would be better, but other types of fraud would be added to this.
The largest Fraud is vote manipulation in large Democrat Cities by software. It is outright THEFT of the legitimate votes with an accompanying destruction of an audit trail. This alone should be sufficient ground to overturn the results as ILLEGITIMATE.
VOTE SWITCHING is a TWO VOTE IMPACT where stolen Trump votes and manufactured fictional Biden votes only have a SINGLE VOTE IMPACT. Every time a polling vote thief called out BIDEN when it should have said TRUMP was a two vote swing.
I'm not sure which state it was, but this process of creating a new ballot while Republican poll watchers were unable to observe the process sound like the process used for 100% Military Ballots for BIDEN.
Thank you. I saw that distinction after I posted. Will edit
Toss in all the Illegals who voted...
Toss in all the out of state ballots....
Toss in all the Dem operatives that DESTROYED TRUMP AREA Ballots....
And not just ARIZONA ..... you can check almost every state!
TRUMP WON IN A LANDSLIDE.... only massive Fraud could save Joe (No Campaign, hide in a basement) Biden.
this is so fucking dumb. access to 100 ballots after 3 weeks? And now we hit the 'jackpot' by finding 2 ballots in the batch because otherwise they would've said there's nothing wrong with anything. Do a full audit.
Agreed. But this is still a win. This is HARD evidence
It would be a win if it were presented to an impartial person. This process has revealed that there are few patriots in control of this process.
huge
2% of duplicated ballots, of which there are 20,000 in Maricopa (which is 62% of Arizona's population). It's important, but it doesn't swing the state.
What swings the state is all of the out-of-state and also fake (yes, non-existant) people who voted!
This, absolutely.
Bobby Piton nailed it: https://www.youtube.com/embed/VDf1j4IQz28
His conclusion is they've added fake voters every year over the last decade.
Since 2000, population has gone up 40% in Arizona. In the same time, the # of voters went up 300%.
For those that missed it, he specifically identifies the Undisclosed gender voters.
In Arizona, there were 463,660 undisclosed gender voters. He found 94%+ correlation in how they vote over time....compared to ~60% for men and women.
Type 1 voters were hard-line republican. Type 3 are swing. Type 5 are hard-line democrats. The bell-curve there is telling, considering it seems logical that most people who would choose undisclosed gender instead of male/female would be left-leaning. But according to the data, it's distributed equally among every type of voter. Makes no sense.
A little further....when he unpacked that data by age, he looked at the maximum # of U votes in any given precinct in AZ and he correlated that to the average # of votes per age group took place....the result was > 97% correlation. He's essentially saying that the number of Undisclosed gender voters in each precinct is almost the EXACT SAME percentage across nearly all precincts.
Yes. This is a subset of the total ballots. The DUPLICATED ballots. Not all of them.
Personally I think it is crazy that there is so much ballot curing. This would be solved by forbidding absentee ballots and hand counting everything.
Um guys....I don't think that's how the math works. Not dooming or doubting 40k could have been flipped, but why are you extrapolating 100 randomly selected ballets for the entire state?
This better lead to a full blown audit in Arizona and hopefully other states.
What's important is....GOP is saying Biden was given Trump votes and Trump lost votes. When a sample was provided this is exactly what they found.
Your math isn't entirely correct. The sample was taken from duplicate ballots. Not all 2 mln ballots in Maricopa are duplicates.
To be clear, this was a sample audit of DUPLICATED ballots. I haven't seen a number in the lawsuit, other than remarks that it was unusually high, but I'm quite confident that there are not 2M duplicated ballots.
They sampled only 100 ballots and found 2 errors. That's a tiny sample. If they sample 1000, they may find 20... or they may find 40.