Type 1 voters were hard-line republican. Type 3 are swing. Type 5 are hard-line democrats. The bell-curve there is telling, considering it seems logical that most people who would choose undisclosed gender instead of male/female would be left-leaning. But according to the data, it's distributed equally among every type of voter. Makes no sense.
A little further....when he unpacked that data by age, he looked at the maximum # of U votes in any given precinct in AZ and he correlated that to the average # of votes per age group took place....the result was > 97% correlation. He's essentially saying that the number of Undisclosed gender voters in each precinct is almost the EXACT SAME percentage across nearly all precincts.
Bobby Piton nailed it: https://www.youtube.com/embed/VDf1j4IQz28
His conclusion is they've added fake voters every year over the last decade.
Since 2000, population has gone up 40% in Arizona. In the same time, the # of voters went up 300%.
For those that missed it, he specifically identifies the Undisclosed gender voters.
In Arizona, there were 463,660 undisclosed gender voters. He found 94%+ correlation in how they vote over time....compared to ~60% for men and women.
Type 1 voters were hard-line republican. Type 3 are swing. Type 5 are hard-line democrats. The bell-curve there is telling, considering it seems logical that most people who would choose undisclosed gender instead of male/female would be left-leaning. But according to the data, it's distributed equally among every type of voter. Makes no sense.
A little further....when he unpacked that data by age, he looked at the maximum # of U votes in any given precinct in AZ and he correlated that to the average # of votes per age group took place....the result was > 97% correlation. He's essentially saying that the number of Undisclosed gender voters in each precinct is almost the EXACT SAME percentage across nearly all precincts.