483
Comments (19)
sorted by:
9
Excelerator11 9 points ago +9 / -0

So that mean's you need to do a total audit. 2% can mean thousands

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
8
pithys 8 points ago +8 / -0

So 1 ballot thrown out, and 1 changed to biden. That's a 3 point swing.

But how many duplicated ballots are there? We probably also need signature check

1
sesquipedalian 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what I want to know. How many? With sharpie gate and the deliberate use of sharpies, we should assume it's a lot.

2
pithys 2 points ago +2 / -0

heard only 20k.

1
sesquipedalian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Darn, wished there were more, but it's a good start. It is also direct physical evidence of election fraud among the election workers, as opposed to "random meaningless voter fraud that changes nothing".

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
My2Cents 2 points ago +2 / -0

There were about 2.5 million absentee ballots cast in AZ.

3% is 75,000 votes.

Margin of "victory" was 20,600.

1
bubadmt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even if it was only 1% it would still mean flipping it. This merits a full audit.

5
Tucso 5 points ago +5 / -0

Arizona is about to fall. I want Wisconsin to fall. It’s sooo close!! Just need a ruling on that proposed order

4
CurvedHollowFangs 4 points ago +5 / -1

Mount up, Patriots

2
giggitybooped 2 points ago +2 / -0

2/100 ballots Drumpftards! ...Only 2% off you dips! Math is racist so to be more equitable .3 > 2! Checkmate.

2
underthesmellybridge 2 points ago +2 / -0

TAKE A DEEP BREATH, AND THEN APPRECIATE HOW HUGE THIS IS

This somewhat-swampy article from the Arizona Republic newspaper (archive here) explains that the GOP was allowed to inspect a total of 200 ballots to find hard evidence of fraud.

100 early (mail-in) ballots can be checked for signature matching

100 duplicate ballots (created when the original was damaged such that it couldn't be read by the counting machines) can be checked for accuracy.

During the preliminary hearing, Warner said he would allow Ward's lawyers to compare signatures on 100 random early ballot envelopes with the signatures on file for those voters, instead of the thousands of ballots Ward's team initially sought to review.

He said he would let the team inspect 100 ballots election officials worked to duplicate after tabulators failed to read them as well.

This video announcement from Dr. Kelli Ward, Chairwoman of the Arizona Republican Party, announces that of the 100 duplicate ballots inspected, one vote was switched from Trump to Biden and one Trump vote was not counted. That's a net change of three votes (Trump -2, Biden +1).

That's HUGE but not the end of the game when it comes to the election because there are a relatively small number of duplicate ballots (again, they're created only when the original is damaged).

The signature matching of the other 100 ballots is the real potential game changer, because there were more than 2 million early ballots case in Arizona. A 3% error rate there would invalidate the entire election.

2
BonaGoApeTits 2 points ago +2 / -0

So glad I voted for her instead of mcsally

2
Wazntme 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you have different methods of insertion you need different methods of detection....next verify signatures.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
-1
SirPokeSmottington -1 points ago +1 / -2

Isn't the duplication of ballots fraud itself?

No, it's a valid cure in certain situations.

It's the environment that makes this hincky.

0
Maui_Boy 0 points ago +1 / -1

It’s posted everywhere bud

2
doejohnblowjoe [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

sure now it is. check the time stamp