15
posted ago by TrumpsBestFriend +15 / -0

It's easier to embed 100,000 falsified or illegal ballots across 100 counties than 10. In some states there's a minimum recount margin that only triggers an audit if X% are inaccurate.

Furthermore It's easier to drop more ballots for a Democrat in a Blue county because nobody suspects an abnormally high turnout for Biden. If it hadn't been 96% but something more reasonable like 70%, we probably wouldn't have noticed. Keep in mind Trump won 14% of San Francisco and they were trying to imply Atlanta & Milwaukee had a more liberal batch.

It's easier to embed 100,000 falsified or illegal ballots across 100 counties than 10. In some states there's a minimum recount margin that only triggers an audit if X% are inaccurate. Furthermore It's easier to drop more ballots for a Democrat in a Blue county because nobody suspects an abnormally high turnout for Biden. If it hadn't been **96%** but something more reasonable like 70%, we probably wouldn't have noticed. Keep in mind Trump won 14% of San Francisco and they were trying to imply Atlanta & Milwaukee had a more liberal batch.
Comments (1)
sorted by:
1
anon572759 1 point ago +1 / -0

Easier to hide, not easier to do. Its much easier to pump a large number of fake votes into just a few large Democrat stronghold counties than to spread it out statewide cause of the possibility of witnesses (like all the affidavits have shown.)

Their plan down the road is to obviously use the machines to siphon votes digitally from red counties like they've done, it just doesn't work when someone like Trump comes in and just wrecks their algorithms to the point where they have to stop the count and drain the ballot machines of ink just to print enough ballots to make up the difference.