I know everyone was enamored with his presentation, but I'm not certain everyone understands the magnitude of his discovery, which is that they've added fake voters every year over the last one to two decades.
Since 2000, population has gone up 40% in Arizona. In the same time, the # of voters went up 300%.
For those that missed it, he specifically identifies the Undisclosed gender voters.
In Arizona, there were 463,660 undisclosed gender voters. He found 94%+ correlation in how they vote over time....compared to ~60% for men and women.
Type 1 voters were hard-line republican. Type 3 are swing. Type 5 are hard-line democrats. The bell-curve there is telling, considering it seems logical that most people who would choose undisclosed gender instead of male/female would be left-leaning. But according to the data, it's distributed equally among every type of voter. Makes no sense.
A little further....when he unpacked that data by age, he looked at the maximum # of U votes in any given precinct in AZ and he correlated that to the average # of votes per age group took place....the result was > 97% correlation. He's essentially saying that the number of Undisclosed gender voters in each precinct is almost the EXACT SAME percentage across nearly all precincts.
He's suggesting that they've injected fake people across all precincts and they've been doing it for years, if not decades.
Well a bell curve is expected with a normal distribution, but it doesn't make much sense when it comes to who chooses Undisclosed gender. Maybe he and I are reading too much into that, but who is more likely to choose undisclosed gender? A hard-line republican or a hard-line democrat? Why is the distribution so perfectly a bell curve among all 5 type of voters?
Furthermore, who choose undisclosed gender? Do we really expect most of them to be swing voters and not left-leaning?
An additional theory that I'm suggesting, and one of the other point's he might be implying is that democrats and republicans alike have a gentleman's agreement about who gets to win, about who gets to use these votes....so it makes sense that most of them would be swing voters.
Good readback of what Bobby found. You could tell in in presentation that he's super passionate about this and willing to follow the data wherever it leads.
If we were to extrapolate the results from this sample, for every 100 votes for Trump, the vote-spread between he and Biden was fraudulently increased by 3 in favor of Biden.
It just so happens, this matches perfectly with Dr. Shiva's results...
Yep! They just had a rep on Newsmax say they inspected 100 mail-in ballots in AZ. One ballot for Trump was never counted and one ballot for Trump was credited to Biden. So 2 Percent of that small batch was incorrectly tabulated.
Weigh the ballots in every problem county. That would tell you right away if they scanned the same ballots multiple times. Weighing the ballots would be really simple and quick. #weightheballots
Note how the "duplicate ballots" were defined in the video. They were defined as physical ballots that were not readable/differentiable. This is not the same as the massive number of digital "duplicate ballots" produced from double-scanned and double-counted copies of readable/differentiable physical ballots for Cheater Joe 8-10 times, according to eyewitness.
TAKE A DEEP BREATH, AND THEN APPRECIATE HOW HUGE THIS IS
This somewhat-swampy article from the Arizona Republic newspaper (archive here) explains that the GOP was allowed to inspect a total of 200 ballots to find hard evidence of fraud.
100 early (mail-in) ballots can be checked for signature matching
100 duplicate ballots (created when the original was damaged such that it couldn't be read by the counting machines) can be checked for accuracy.
During the preliminary hearing, Warner said he would allow Ward's lawyers to compare signatures on 100 random early ballot envelopes with the signatures on file for those voters, instead of the thousands of ballots Ward's team initially sought to review.
He said he would let the team inspect 100 ballots election officials worked to duplicate after tabulators failed to read them as well.
This video announcement from Dr. Kelli Ward, Chairwoman of the Arizona Republican Party, announces that of the 100 duplicate ballots inspected, one vote was switched from Trump to Biden and one Trump vote was not counted. That's a net change of three votes (Trump -2, Biden +1).
That's HUGE but not the end of the game when it comes to the election because there are a relatively small number of duplicate ballots (again, they're created only when the original is damaged).
The signature matching of the other 100 ballots is the real potential game changer, because there were more than 2 million early ballots case in Arizona. A 3% error rate there would invalidate the entire election.
It’s interesting enough to do a larger sample size. 100 is far from conclusive, from an evidentiary stand point.
Not saying there’s not fraud, I’m just saying, this isn’t that high on the list of all the fraud that’s been documented, even from statistical analysis stand point
We have a small sample size of ballots in which 2% have been altered against Trump. This is not enough to throw out the election. However, THIS IS ABSOLUTELY ENOUGH TO WARRANT AN IN DEPTH EXAMINATION OF EVERY SINGLE DUPLICATED BALLOT. If such an error (being generous) rate persists, then AZ voted Trump.
It's arguably enough to refuse to certify or send delegates. The Constitutional process expects a positive determination, no merely "I guess it could still be valid".
The legislature should make a prudent, responsible decision, and should not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Look, I believe that there was enough fraud to seriously throw into doubt that Biden won AZ, but this ALONE isn’t it. They looked at 100 ballots and found 2 discrepancies. A Trump supporter would probably believe that, “We found fraud even in a tiny sample. That shows a widespread problem, throw out the fraudulent results.” A Leftist on the other hand would say, “You only found 2 ballot mistakes, there’s no way that you can overturn the election based on 2 ballots, especially when the margin of victory is 5,000 times larger!”
In their own way, both are correct, and we don’t want to end up in a place where Leftists can throw out legitimate elections with 2 fraudulent ballots (especially when we know that they would cast and then catch the fraudulent ballots). Therefore, this evidence, ALONE, doesn’t mean that the results can be tossed, but it does show that the ballots need a close examination.
This is 2 too many. It's clear and compelling evidence the entire election should be thrown out and rerun competently. But I don't think it's clear and compelling to the normies.
this is so bad. they've tossed trump ballots in the trash. they "fix" trump ballots by curing them as biden ballots. they used 3rd party votes and trump votes as biden votes.
they had to do so much work because of how much of a lead trump had.
and thats on top of the weighted vote in the voting machines switching 30% over to biden.
Now that we are doing that math lets go over the entire race!
Bring back Bobby Piton because he nailed it: https://www.youtube.com/embed/VDf1j4IQz28
I know everyone was enamored with his presentation, but I'm not certain everyone understands the magnitude of his discovery, which is that they've added fake voters every year over the last one to two decades.
Since 2000, population has gone up 40% in Arizona. In the same time, the # of voters went up 300%.
For those that missed it, he specifically identifies the Undisclosed gender voters.
In Arizona, there were 463,660 undisclosed gender voters. He found 94%+ correlation in how they vote over time....compared to ~60% for men and women.
Type 1 voters were hard-line republican. Type 3 are swing. Type 5 are hard-line democrats. The bell-curve there is telling, considering it seems logical that most people who would choose undisclosed gender instead of male/female would be left-leaning. But according to the data, it's distributed equally among every type of voter. Makes no sense.
A little further....when he unpacked that data by age, he looked at the maximum # of U votes in any given precinct in AZ and he correlated that to the average # of votes per age group took place....the result was > 97% correlation. He's essentially saying that the number of Undisclosed gender voters in each precinct is almost the EXACT SAME percentage across nearly all precincts.
He's suggesting that they've injected fake people across all precincts and they've been doing it for years, if not decades.
Thanks for writing all that down. That was my takeaway - the "Blue Creep" into red states was fraud.
Well a bell curve is expected with a normal distribution, but it doesn't make much sense when it comes to who chooses Undisclosed gender. Maybe he and I are reading too much into that, but who is more likely to choose undisclosed gender? A hard-line republican or a hard-line democrat? Why is the distribution so perfectly a bell curve among all 5 type of voters?
Furthermore, who choose undisclosed gender? Do we really expect most of them to be swing voters and not left-leaning?
An additional theory that I'm suggesting, and one of the other point's he might be implying is that democrats and republicans alike have a gentleman's agreement about who gets to win, about who gets to use these votes....so it makes sense that most of them would be swing voters.
And just another quick follow-up! I just checked Georgia's voter registrations, and I can see only 15,935 undisclosed gender voters.
How the hell does Arizona have 463,660?
Good readback of what Bobby found. You could tell in in presentation that he's super passionate about this and willing to follow the data wherever it leads.
The important part here is the type of errors found. One straight up switch from Trump to Biden and one Trump to trash can.
Yep, it's all one way so far. Makes the claim of fraud more convincing than mere error. But we need a full audit to see.
Yes, and every switch results in a 2-vote swing.
If we were to extrapolate the results from this sample, for every 100 votes for Trump, the vote-spread between he and Biden was fraudulently increased by 3 in favor of Biden.
It just so happens, this matches perfectly with Dr. Shiva's results...
Evidence!!!! now lets do the audit on the rest!
Yep! They just had a rep on Newsmax say they inspected 100 mail-in ballots in AZ. One ballot for Trump was never counted and one ballot for Trump was credited to Biden. So 2 Percent of that small batch was incorrectly tabulated.
3%. -2% from Trump + 1% for Biden.
It’s actually more than that because it’s out of 99 votes afterward.
They fought in the courts for the ability to just look at 100 ballots
Ok, let's start here. Bill Barr get a forensic team, warrant and seize that evidence! Show the workers who were involved being flown to GITMO.
Run ads on ALL MSM channels with our new Poster Children of Fraud. Dare them to block it!
MANY more whistleblowers would come crawling out of the scum of dem' swamps!
That's never going to happen - you know there isn't a KFC anywhere near Gitmo, right?
I took that from, "FBI for Dummies" book. It's new, probably too late for the current crew. lol
It's sickening how much evidence they essentially wasted. Crooks and Cronies, no charges. Good men tarred and feathered. Such BS!
So a 4% swing?
No because only one of the two ballots was assigned to Biden.
2% too much!
Nailed it!
its not even the swapped votes... its that biden had numbers beating 0bama. that alone should signal the ballot fraud.
all the other stuff, ostensibly, is just icing on the cake
2 points is the state
Weigh the ballots in every problem county. That would tell you right away if they scanned the same ballots multiple times. Weighing the ballots would be really simple and quick. #weightheballots
Note how the "duplicate ballots" were defined in the video. They were defined as physical ballots that were not readable/differentiable. This is not the same as the massive number of digital "duplicate ballots" produced from double-scanned and double-counted copies of readable/differentiable physical ballots for Cheater Joe 8-10 times, according to eyewitness.
TAKE A DEEP BREATH, AND THEN APPRECIATE HOW HUGE THIS IS
This somewhat-swampy article from the Arizona Republic newspaper (archive here) explains that the GOP was allowed to inspect a total of 200 ballots to find hard evidence of fraud.
100 early (mail-in) ballots can be checked for signature matching
100 duplicate ballots (created when the original was damaged such that it couldn't be read by the counting machines) can be checked for accuracy.
This video announcement from Dr. Kelli Ward, Chairwoman of the Arizona Republican Party, announces that of the 100 duplicate ballots inspected, one vote was switched from Trump to Biden and one Trump vote was not counted. That's a net change of three votes (Trump -2, Biden +1).
That's HUGE but not the end of the game when it comes to the election because there are a relatively small number of duplicate ballots (again, they're created only when the original is damaged).
The signature matching of the other 100 ballots is the real potential game changer, because there were more than 2 million early ballots case in Arizona. A 3% error rate there would invalidate the entire election.
Dr. Kelly Ward got them titties tho
It’s interesting enough to do a larger sample size. 100 is far from conclusive, from an evidentiary stand point.
Not saying there’s not fraud, I’m just saying, this isn’t that high on the list of all the fraud that’s been documented, even from statistical analysis stand point
The left will say 2% fraud is acceptable.
To be clear. It’s not just 2%. -2 for Trump +1 for Biden That’s a 3% shift in Biden’s favor.
Well, well, well....the fraud the everybody said was happening, is indeed happening - the SHOCK!
Needs a bigger sample.
Say...the population of Arizona?
Sample size is too small.
Either way, this is wrong as there is no way to account shredded Trump ballots.
We have a small sample size of ballots in which 2% have been altered against Trump. This is not enough to throw out the election. However, THIS IS ABSOLUTELY ENOUGH TO WARRANT AN IN DEPTH EXAMINATION OF EVERY SINGLE DUPLICATED BALLOT. If such an error (being generous) rate persists, then AZ voted Trump.
MORE CHECKS, MORE BALLOTS.
It's arguably enough to refuse to certify or send delegates. The Constitutional process expects a positive determination, no merely "I guess it could still be valid".
The legislature should make a prudent, responsible decision, and should not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Look, I believe that there was enough fraud to seriously throw into doubt that Biden won AZ, but this ALONE isn’t it. They looked at 100 ballots and found 2 discrepancies. A Trump supporter would probably believe that, “We found fraud even in a tiny sample. That shows a widespread problem, throw out the fraudulent results.” A Leftist on the other hand would say, “You only found 2 ballot mistakes, there’s no way that you can overturn the election based on 2 ballots, especially when the margin of victory is 5,000 times larger!”
In their own way, both are correct, and we don’t want to end up in a place where Leftists can throw out legitimate elections with 2 fraudulent ballots (especially when we know that they would cast and then catch the fraudulent ballots). Therefore, this evidence, ALONE, doesn’t mean that the results can be tossed, but it does show that the ballots need a close examination.
No complaints about how Kelli Ward is fighting. Where is the corresponding GOP point man in Georgia?
Keli Ward could have been AZ Senator!!! Why the f does that state ekect the worst of the worst RINOs?
Wait, what? 2% of 100 is exactly 2.
This is 2 too many. It's clear and compelling evidence the entire election should be thrown out and rerun competently. But I don't think it's clear and compelling to the normies.
2 votes...yep, the walls of corruption are beginning to fall.
Whats 2% of 3,387,326 (ballots cast) ? ~67746 ballots
What's the margin between Biden/Trump victory 10457 or +/- ~5228 votes flipped
If the 2% number holds, they would need to review about 522850 ballots.
How many "duplicated" ballots available? In Maricopa County...about 20,000.
Thankfully this isn't the only avenue they are investigating.
this is so bad. they've tossed trump ballots in the trash. they "fix" trump ballots by curing them as biden ballots. they used 3rd party votes and trump votes as biden votes.
they had to do so much work because of how much of a lead trump had.
and thats on top of the weighted vote in the voting machines switching 30% over to biden.