Itβs interesting enough to do a larger sample size. 100 is far from conclusive, from an evidentiary stand point.
Not saying thereβs not fraud, Iβm just saying, this isnβt that high on the list of all the fraud thatβs been documented, even from statistical analysis stand point
Itβs interesting enough to do a larger sample size. 100 is far from conclusive, from an evidentiary stand point.
Not saying thereβs not fraud, Iβm just saying, this isnβt that high on the list of all the fraud thatβs been documented, even from statistical analysis stand point