I know everyone was enamored with his presentation, but I'm not certain everyone understands the magnitude of his discovery, which is that they've added fake voters every year over the last one to two decades.
Since 2000, population has gone up 40% in Arizona. In the same time, the # of voters went up 300%.
For those that missed it, he specifically identifies the Undisclosed gender voters.
In Arizona, there were 463,660 undisclosed gender voters. He found 94%+ correlation in how they vote over time....compared to ~60% for men and women.
Type 1 voters were hard-line republican. Type 3 are swing. Type 5 are hard-line democrats. The bell-curve there is telling, considering it seems logical that most people who would choose undisclosed gender instead of male/female would be left-leaning. But according to the data, it's distributed equally among every type of voter. Makes no sense.
A little further....when he unpacked that data by age, he looked at the maximum # of U votes in any given precinct in AZ and he correlated that to the average # of votes per age group took place....the result was > 97% correlation. He's essentially saying that the number of Undisclosed gender voters in each precinct is almost the EXACT SAME percentage across nearly all precincts.
He's suggesting that they've injected fake people across all precincts and they've been doing it for years, if not decades.
Good readback of what Bobby found. You could tell in in presentation that he's super passionate about this and willing to follow the data wherever it leads.
Now that we are doing that math lets go over the entire race!
Bring back Bobby Piton because he nailed it: https://www.youtube.com/embed/VDf1j4IQz28
I know everyone was enamored with his presentation, but I'm not certain everyone understands the magnitude of his discovery, which is that they've added fake voters every year over the last one to two decades.
Since 2000, population has gone up 40% in Arizona. In the same time, the # of voters went up 300%.
For those that missed it, he specifically identifies the Undisclosed gender voters.
In Arizona, there were 463,660 undisclosed gender voters. He found 94%+ correlation in how they vote over time....compared to ~60% for men and women.
Type 1 voters were hard-line republican. Type 3 are swing. Type 5 are hard-line democrats. The bell-curve there is telling, considering it seems logical that most people who would choose undisclosed gender instead of male/female would be left-leaning. But according to the data, it's distributed equally among every type of voter. Makes no sense.
A little further....when he unpacked that data by age, he looked at the maximum # of U votes in any given precinct in AZ and he correlated that to the average # of votes per age group took place....the result was > 97% correlation. He's essentially saying that the number of Undisclosed gender voters in each precinct is almost the EXACT SAME percentage across nearly all precincts.
He's suggesting that they've injected fake people across all precincts and they've been doing it for years, if not decades.
Good readback of what Bobby found. You could tell in in presentation that he's super passionate about this and willing to follow the data wherever it leads.