2164
Comments (48)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
salvecitizen 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's arguably enough to refuse to certify or send delegates. The Constitutional process expects a positive determination, no merely "I guess it could still be valid".

The legislature should make a prudent, responsible decision, and should not require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

1
JohnR23 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look, I believe that there was enough fraud to seriously throw into doubt that Biden won AZ, but this ALONE isn’t it. They looked at 100 ballots and found 2 discrepancies. A Trump supporter would probably believe that, β€œWe found fraud even in a tiny sample. That shows a widespread problem, throw out the fraudulent results.” A Leftist on the other hand would say, β€œYou only found 2 ballot mistakes, there’s no way that you can overturn the election based on 2 ballots, especially when the margin of victory is 5,000 times larger!”

In their own way, both are correct, and we don’t want to end up in a place where Leftists can throw out legitimate elections with 2 fraudulent ballots (especially when we know that they would cast and then catch the fraudulent ballots). Therefore, this evidence, ALONE, doesn’t mean that the results can be tossed, but it does show that the ballots need a close examination.