Immediate freeze of assets is the big thing. Not only that, but those assets can be frozen even before a public declaration is made, owing to the speed at which financial transactions occur nowadays.
So not only will the bad actors be cut off, but they'll know it well before we do.
It’s intentionally vague, but it does say something about response to the interference. Could theoretically include determination of constitutionality of results? Any other thoughts?
Sit tight and enjoy the show. Trump is in control.
Immediate freeze of assets is the big thing. Not only that, but those assets can be frozen even before a public declaration is made, owing to the speed at which financial transactions occur nowadays.
So not only will the bad actors be cut off, but they'll know it well before we do.
Should make for some good fun.
It’s intentionally vague, but it does say something about response to the interference. Could theoretically include determination of constitutionality of results? Any other thoughts?