29
posted ago by Tseliteiv +29 / -0

Here's another proof of fraud, albeit, it's a little abstract.

I work in finance and calculating the value-add of a project is something I'm good at. In order for any project to make sense from the perspective of a business, it must be profitable.

The only way dominion voting machines make any sense in implementing is if they save more in salary costs than they do in implementation cost. These machines offer no other value except in their ability to commit fraud.

On average, I figure a poll worker makes $300 for an election, including training.

Georgia for example, spent $107m for 30,000 dominion voting machines to replace 17 year old "technology". If we assume $107m every 15 years (life expectancy) and that there is on average 1 election per voting machine per year, based on my calculations, the number of poll workers the machines would have to save (without factoring in overhead/administration costs) would be approximately: 60 Poll Workers per machine. Do you really think one of these Dominion voting machines saves 60 poll workers? Do you even think it saves 10 poll workers? Because that leaves a lot of room for administrative costs. I used 1.5% as my expected rate of borrowing for Georgia State.

That doesn't include of course any of the additional costs the machines themselves incur due to legal battles, recounts, etc...

Basically, there is 0, ABSOLUTELY ZERO business case for any State to ever buy dominion voting machines. It is 100% a scam. The only reason anyone could be convinced to buy them is if there is corruption going on. Either politicians are purposely wasting tax-payers money (likely) or the reason for dominion voting machines is entirely to cheat the system and implement cheating in democracies. There is no financial argument for them.

Here's another proof of fraud, albeit, it's a little abstract. I work in finance and calculating the value-add of a project is something I'm good at. In order for any project to make sense from the perspective of a business, it must be profitable. The only way dominion voting machines make any sense in implementing is if they save more in salary costs than they do in implementation cost. These machines offer no other value except in their ability to commit fraud. On average, I figure a poll worker makes $300 for an election, including training. Georgia for example, spent $107m for 30,000 dominion voting machines to replace 17 year old "technology". If we assume $107m every 15 years (life expectancy) and that there is on average 1 election per voting machine per year, based on my calculations, the number of poll workers the machines would have to save (without factoring in overhead/administration costs) would be approximately: 60 Poll Workers per machine. Do you really think one of these Dominion voting machines saves 60 poll workers? Do you even think it saves 10 poll workers? Because that leaves a lot of room for administrative costs. I used 1.5% as my expected rate of borrowing for Georgia State. That doesn't include of course any of the additional costs the machines themselves incur due to legal battles, recounts, etc... Basically, there is 0, ABSOLUTELY ZERO business case for any State to ever buy dominion voting machines. It is 100% a scam. The only reason anyone could be convinced to buy them is if there is corruption going on. Either politicians are purposely wasting tax-payers money (likely) or the reason for dominion voting machines is entirely to cheat the system and implement cheating in democracies. There is no financial argument for them.
Comments (7)
sorted by:
1
BasedRetard 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a complicated piece of software that allows a computer to add 1 to some number repeatedly.

1
JerryNadlerBeltFund 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a system that uses a complicated algorithm to hide the fact that is allocating votes based on predetermined ratios, rather than actually counting real votes.

You have asked/answered your own question.

1
Fringe--dweller 1 point ago +1 / -0

Their big earners are regime changes, which the same crew are attempting in The USA right now.

1
Gramps80 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here's the thing though: how often do you buy something, and it's more expensive than the alternative, but it makes whatever task you're trying to accomplish a lot easier? Might not be much faster, but takes some hands-on work off of your plate. Probably at least occasionally if you're in the middle class.

Either politicians are purposely wasting tax-payers money

Bingo. They don't like working, they don't care if the people they hire with other people's money do any work, so they buy whatever requires the least work. I think that's the likely explanation here. Alternatively, we got fucked by Republicans who pretended to be MAGA and kept these fraud machines anyway, knowing fully well they were broken- and I hope that's not the case; it could be, but if it is, it's time to focus on re-evaluating who are allies truly are and primarying the shit out of the GOP.

1
Tseliteiv [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

The above only works if you are gaining the convenience. Do you think any of the politicians opting to buy these machines are poll workers and are doing it save themselves time? No.

Poll workers are average citizens. What these machines have done is take tax-payer money from taxes to allocate those funds toward the owners of dominion and away from giving the money back to poll workers. It's highway robbery. Tax people to give money to corporation that doesn't even do anything meanwhile you're reducing the number of jobs where you gave the tax payers money back to the people you taxed. It's about as much as theft as you can get without it being called theft.

1
Gramps80 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you think any of the politicians opting to buy these machines are poll workers and are doing it save themselves time? No.

True, but I think a lot of people in government honestly don't care that much about what they're doing. If poll workers whined and bitched about there being too much work to a politician's office for too long, I could see them just throwing taxpayer money at the problem and saying "ok now go away."

That's just one theory though- I'm still torn on this. It's easier to accept that the GOP old-guard like GA's SoS are just morons, rather than actively trying to help the Democrats, because the former is much easier to fix. The latter is still likely, but means we really have our work cut out for us.

1
Tseliteiv [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I suspect kickbacks. The owners of Dominion likely paid politicians somehow.

Also, it took me all of 5 minutes to calculate the lack of financial viability in dominion voting machines. Only a moron wouldn't be able to see it. Someone like Bill Gates promoting dominion voting machines to me indicates very nefarious intentions behind Dominion and the elite. I also am not entirely sure our politicians are this incredibly stupid. It's easy to think so but I think they are simply more evil and corrupt. Dominion voting machines, even if they didn't switch votes, is still a hugely corrupt business that is wasting tax payers money, likely to the benefit of corrupt politicians who're taking a kickback IMO.