14
posted ago by bellcurvestrikesback +15 / -1

I don't get it. What problem would it solve? I thought conservatives were opposed to martial law.

Comments (24)
sorted by:
14
usdodsgssog 14 points ago +15 / -1

If the rule of law fails then that's pretty much our only recourse to take back the country from a communist takeover.

9
manmadegod 9 points ago +10 / -1

Sometimes you have to cut deep to cut away corruption that sits at the heart of a crumbling republic in a last-ditch to save it from mortality.

7
NOT_ADMIN 7 points ago +8 / -1

Martial law has its purpose. I would say its the least preferred option.

6
deleted 6 points ago +12 / -6
0
bellcurvestrikesback [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

I didn't understand the connection between holding the deepstate accountable and declaring martial law

5
deleted 5 points ago +10 / -5
4
deleted 4 points ago +9 / -5
2
Psalm5v10 2 points ago +2 / -0

Martial law allows the military to take over arresting the enemy combatants perpetrating this coup, and then deal with them via military tribunals (since the DOJ has been completely corrupted by the deep state).

1
MastaJoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

This

5
Rapidfire 5 points ago +6 / -1

Maybe you prefer war ?

4
Winter_Is_Coming2020 4 points ago +5 / -1

This^

Lin Wood suggested limited marshall law solely to redo a fair/free election to prevent a looming civil war due to election fraud

1
MastaJoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup, war is coming if all these involved and the russiagate, pedogate and all these other commie criminals aren’t fucking imprisoned or executed for crimes against the US and We the People. Trump either saves it with mass arrests and military tribunals or he’s ousted and we PATS ELIMINATE ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT

3
Dergy 3 points ago +4 / -1

Why would Conservatives be opposed to martial law? That makes absolutely no sense at all.

-1
bellcurvestrikesback [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

I remember all throughout bush and obama people like alex jones were warning about the government using martial law to take control

3
Dergy 3 points ago +4 / -1

They were against using martial law to impose Communism, and we're not against using martial law to stop Communism.

Either way, it's just a fight against Communism.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Dergy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't quote me on this, but if memory serves, you don't swap horses in the middle of the stream, meaning presidents don't change out once martial law is imposed.

2
MastaJoda 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a fact! In a state of emergency of such, Trump remains in power until the emergency is over, etc.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
AlFreeman 3 points ago +4 / -1

When the civil government has been completely corrupted by traitors and turncoats, it's the last option we have. Hopefully it won't be necessary. In normal circumstances we'd be completely opposed to it.

1
MastaJoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t see how we can avoid it if they are serious about fixing the commie issue. We’d have to gut local and state governments as well as most government agencies. These parasites are just like tics.

2
Jargin2 2 points ago +3 / -1

Martial Law is necessary if word comes down that our SCOTUS won't overturn an obviously fraudulent election. The sole purpose of it would be to convict the domestic persons engaged in the fraud via trial, to conduct a new election only done in person with photo ID and finger prints done on paper ballots to count all legal votes

1
MastaJoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or try all traitors cia military tribunals for crimes of war against the US. FunFact: Commiting election fraud is an act of war when in coordination with foreign powers, like say China or Iran. 😉

1
cmart 1 point ago +1 / -0

After reading the responses, I kinda agree. I'd prefer that to a civil war.