It's tricky to explain by comparison because I can't think of any other phenomenon it's comparable to but it's like this: Almost all woman want to be dominated by a strong man and be forced into a submissive role. The issue is that women can't willingly assume the submissive role, otherwise that indicates the man isn't strong enough for her. It's a giant shit test. Women act as unruly as possible because they are seeking a strong enough man to reign her in. You see this in nature all the time. Female lions for example don't just bow down to the male immediately. They prod at him and test him and then when he shows his superior strength, she backs down. Humans play the same song and dance, albeit, our song and dances are far more complex but ultimately, it's the same game.
The issue right now that is men gave way too much power to women while also oppressing their own power in order to push for equality. The State oppresses men through taxes and laws that disproportionately negatively impact men. One minor example of a State Law that disproportionately negatively impacts men is the law against violence of any kind. In a society where minor violence is allowed when people insult you, like a face slap, which used to be our society, men had an advantage over women. This changed the way women were forced to act in relation to men because they might get hit and this imitated a more natural dynamic between humans that didn't involve a State. Now if a man did this, the State and its enforcers of men (police) will negatively impact the man. He is thus oppressed by men in the State to elevate women. This distorts the natural balance between men and women. I'm using violence specifically as an example here because it's a subject often ignored and generally accepted as bad; however, there is a reason feminists have strongly been against violence because anything that involves strength they are undoubtedly weaker, so a society that allows bouts of strength to revolve disputes, favours men over women. When you oppress this, you are oppressing the natural balance.
The above also ties into "holding them accountable". Understand that so much of what benefits women is enforced by men, whether that's taxes to subsidize single-mothers (if a man doesn't pay the police come to his door because it's a crime) etc... The most simple way to change things is to simply reduce government. The smaller the government and the more freedom men have the more nature will take its course.
It's tricky to explain by comparison because I can't think of any other phenomenon it's comparable to but it's like this: Almost all woman want to be dominated by a strong man and be forced into a submissive role. The issue is that women can't willingly assume the submissive role, otherwise that indicates the man isn't strong enough for her. It's a giant shit test. Women act as unruly as possible because they are seeking a strong enough man to reign her in.
Yeah, I'll give you that.
The most simple way to change things is to simply reduce government.
Can't agree with this though, the simplest way to change things is to not participate.
I would disagree.
It's tricky to explain by comparison because I can't think of any other phenomenon it's comparable to but it's like this: Almost all woman want to be dominated by a strong man and be forced into a submissive role. The issue is that women can't willingly assume the submissive role, otherwise that indicates the man isn't strong enough for her. It's a giant shit test. Women act as unruly as possible because they are seeking a strong enough man to reign her in. You see this in nature all the time. Female lions for example don't just bow down to the male immediately. They prod at him and test him and then when he shows his superior strength, she backs down. Humans play the same song and dance, albeit, our song and dances are far more complex but ultimately, it's the same game.
The issue right now that is men gave way too much power to women while also oppressing their own power in order to push for equality. The State oppresses men through taxes and laws that disproportionately negatively impact men. One minor example of a State Law that disproportionately negatively impacts men is the law against violence of any kind. In a society where minor violence is allowed when people insult you, like a face slap, which used to be our society, men had an advantage over women. This changed the way women were forced to act in relation to men because they might get hit and this imitated a more natural dynamic between humans that didn't involve a State. Now if a man did this, the State and its enforcers of men (police) will negatively impact the man. He is thus oppressed by men in the State to elevate women. This distorts the natural balance between men and women. I'm using violence specifically as an example here because it's a subject often ignored and generally accepted as bad; however, there is a reason feminists have strongly been against violence because anything that involves strength they are undoubtedly weaker, so a society that allows bouts of strength to revolve disputes, favours men over women. When you oppress this, you are oppressing the natural balance.
The above also ties into "holding them accountable". Understand that so much of what benefits women is enforced by men, whether that's taxes to subsidize single-mothers (if a man doesn't pay the police come to his door because it's a crime) etc... The most simple way to change things is to simply reduce government. The smaller the government and the more freedom men have the more nature will take its course.
Yeah, I'll give you that.
Can't agree with this though, the simplest way to change things is to not participate.