237
Comments (15)
sorted by:
15
Illuminaughtie 15 points ago +15 / -0

normal , except for all the filthy goatfucker rapist scum foisted on you by a feminist gubmint and soros n co

7
medoedich [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Absolutely, makes this even stranger.

4
bigdickhangsright 4 points ago +4 / -0

While I am glad Sweden took this route on covid, I really do find it strange that such a sheepish nation could collectively make such a move that flies in the face of the Great Reset types.

7
BorisWave 7 points ago +7 / -0

WTF why is Sweden based on the virus but cucked when it comes to immigration.

This mismatch is really striking and confusing. Sweden bows down to every globo-fascist agenda (mass migration and climate change) but not to the plandemic?

This is a mystery that we need to solve.

5
medoedich [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Something I also can't figure out.

You'd least expect this from Sweden.

2
MAGASwede 2 points ago +2 / -0

IMO it’s the most Sweden thing ever, it just happens to come off as based on a surface level. Just like with about every other political issue our government is too spineless and lame to dare do anything.

Mass immigration that’s bringing the entire country to the very brink of collapse? Inaction.

More people dying waiting for cancer treatment from our “utopian” healthcare system than from the cancer itself? Inaction.

IEDs and grenades going off pretty much weekly in every major city? Inaction.

Pandemic that’s threatening to “end the world”? Inaction.

Luckily, in this case the rona’ actually turned out to be a non issue and it actually ended up benefitting the people for once. Our media is still portraying it like it’s the end times though.

2
medoedich [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree with everything, but the decision not to lockdown was actually a calculated risk by the state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell.

2
MAGASwede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, I know. And of course I agree with their ultimate decision to not lock down everything. But it still kinda falls in line with the whole inaction thing. It was never about preserving or protecting citizens’ freedom, rather that Tegnell and folkhälsomyndigheten already came to the conclusion that they’d accept that people would get infected and die. This decision was taken in early March when data on death rates and how dangerous it actually was, was not as available or correct as it is now. In other words they decided to not try to do anything because they thought it’d be pointless - and in hopes of reaching a hypothetical herd immunity. They used the wrong equation but ended up with the right answer.

Don’t get me wrong, I am glad they didn’t lock down - I just wish it had been out of respect for our freedom.

3
justknoweverything 3 points ago +3 / -0

sweden is what you get when you have no diversity.... now that they have it, it's falling apart.

3
TAIWANNUMBERONE 3 points ago +3 / -0

There's also no election this year there but I'm sure that's just a coincidence.

1
medoedich [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

No election in France either, but you need fucking signed papers to leave home.

3
Truthdose 3 points ago +4 / -1

She'll be culturally enriched in less than a year

3
EvilGuy 3 points ago +3 / -0

....but but but they should all be dead with that blatant disregard of the pandemic! REEEEE!

1
PepeLeKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

BY GAH!!!! Are there ANY grandmas left alive in Sweden??

1
PepeLeKek 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://www.statista.com/statistics/525353/sweden-number-of-deaths/

Looks like Sweden is on pace to have an average year of deaths this year... makes you think.