In Arizona, it turns out that 3% of the votes cast in the 100 count vote sampling were tainted or worse. This would be, if carried forward, approximately 90,000 votes more than we would need to win the State. Now we were granted a much larger sample to work with. Wow!
(twitter.com)
🦅 Trump Tweet 🦅
posted ago by Korec
+7959 / -1
“Yea but where’s the evidence” - MSM probably
Oh they will refuse to report on this, you know it.
I have this feeling that they could end up doing the wrong thing by not reporting it and taking a bunch of normies by surprise, and really pissing them off because they’ve been told for weeks that there’s no fraud
Media lies are what redpilled me. Once you’ve seen behind the curtain, there’s no going back.
Many people are repeating the false claim that "we only have less than two weeks."
There are several key upcoming Electoral College deadlines under the U.S. Constitution and U.S. Code. Dec. 14 is only one of those dates.
"The U.S. Code (3 U.S.C. §5) provides that if election results are contested in any state, and if the state, prior to election day, has enacted procedures to settle controversies or contests over electors and electoral votes, and if these procedures have been applied, and the results have been determined six days before the electors’ meetings, then these results are considered to be conclusive, and will apply in the counting of the electoral votes. ..."
"Monday after the second Wednesday in December of presidential election years is set (3 U.S.C. §7) as the date on which the electors meet and vote. In 2020, the meeting is on December 14. Electoral college delegations meet separately in their respective states and the District of Columbia at places designated by their state legislature. The electors vote by paper ballot, casting one ballot for President and one for Vice President. ..."
"Certificates of electoral vote results must be delivered to above mentioned officers by the fourth Wednesday in December, in 2020, by December 23 (3 U.S.C. §12)."
"On January 6, or another date set by law, the Senate and House of Representatives assemble at 1:00 p.m. in a joint session at the Capitol, in the House chamber, to count the electoral votes and declare the results (3 U.S.C. §15). ..."
"On this date, the President and Vice President are to be inaugurated. The Twentieth Amendment set the date for inaugurations as January 20, beginning in 1937. Since 1981, the ceremony has, with one exception, been held on the West Front of the Capitol. The Vice President takes the oath first, followed at noon by the President."
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11641
Ain't that some shit?
Paper ballots huh? Hmm Whoa almost like the elites get to have security while the civilian doesn't. Hmm almost like defund the police while the gubberment gets security... Hmm almost like this is a trend or something hmm...
Almost like "You peasants stay home while I take myself out to French Laundry."
Paper vs digital isnt the problem.
It's a big part of the problem
Thanks for the key dates. The election is clearly still being contested without resolution, despite the media's ridiculous attempt to dismiss and demean the President's arguments.
🤦♂️
You are likely missing the context provided by reading the entire linked document.
Jan. 6: Joint Session Challenges to Electoral Vote Returns
"While the tellers announce the results, Members may object to the returns from any individual state as they are announced. Objections to individual state returns must be made in writing by at least one Member each of the Senate and House of Representatives. ..."
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11641
Jan. 6: Objecting to the Counting of One or More Electoral Votes
"Provisions in 3 U.S.C. §15 include a procedure for making and acting on objections to the counting of one or more of the electoral votes from a state or the District of Columbia. When the certificate or equivalent paper from each state (or the District of Columbia) is read, “the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any.” Any such objection must be presented in writing and must be signed by at least one Senator and one Representative. ..."
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32717/12
Your missing the part were if both the house and senate don’t agree on the contested state the EC college vote stands regardless. You left that part out on purpose for hopeful control.... The deadline is dec 8th to have a “safe harbor” resolution AND RESULT. If we don’t have Trump Electors going by the 8th it’s 100% over outside some untested martial law shit which would probably result in an instant impeachment.
If we refuse to let them go through with it, we have as much time as we have people willing to refuse.
Nopers -
If this dickspittles too much, we will wind up with a President Pelosi in March.
The Founders essentially force the issue.
Pelosi will lose the speakership.
Someone- "It's who counts the ballots that matter
I believe Stalin?
Yes it was Stalin. Easily substituted for Biden
A lot of people just can't believe the news media is all lies. They can't fathom it.
I don’t understand it. Not at all.
My theory is that it is so horrific they refuse to live in a world like that and would rather live in their cozy lies.
the Matrix.
Lol I’m old, zeitgeist the movie red pilled me
I must be really old, “None Dare Call It A Conspiracy” by Gary Allen, redpilled me when I was 11 years old.
Me too. My dad showed it to me and I was a liitle young to understand it all but I have re-read it several times since.
Same. I wasn’t anti Trump in 2016, but all I knew about him past 1994 or so was what the media reported. All I knew was that there was no way I was voting for Hillary Clinton.
So I took a survey about my stance on issues, and I matched most with GEOTUS on policy positions. I then started looking for the context behind the clips the media played ad nauseum.
I was equally surprised and PISSED that the media had been lying through their teeth about him, and then I wondered what else they’d been lying about. I was red pilled because of their OBVIOUS animosity and ferocity towards him.
Exactly!! In 2016, my 84-yr old mother was in tears because "Trump was going to cut her Social Security"! Called me all sorts of names for not agreeing with her to the point where I had to stand up and say I was leaving if she wouldn't agree to disagree. The power of MSM is not to be underestimated.... She even imagined herself buying a gun and "taking him out" herself...
Has any politician actually cut social security or do they just raise the age? As a reminder, when it was set up in 1935 the average life expectancy was 66. It's 78.5 now.
There have been better COLA increases under Trump... and of course, he never said he'd cut that program. The MSM lies, and she believes it all. So sad.
Jesus. I'm sorry that happened to you.
Were you able to talk sense in to her I can’t stand all these people who act like everyone is supposed to give a damn about their social security. As if it’s some right. These shitheads think it’s some kind of retirement plan. “I paid into it.” Not like your dumbass thinks you did.
Well, things got better in the intervening 4 years, but now I can't talk to family due to them voting for Biden.... screw them. I'm moving on.
It's amazing how much of what the MSM said back then has turned out to be wrong, and that their viewers just ignore it
Yeah... 4 years later, and she doesn't even remember the part about wanting to buy a gun to assassinate him! OMG
You know what's wild? Back in the day the stars and media loved him. It's not too hard to find old videos of him rubbing elbows with Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Joy Behar on the View practically sitting in his lap...it boggles the mind.
In the movie Glengarry Glen Ross, there's a moment when a man suckered by Al Pacino realizes he's being lied to. To me it perfectly captures the moment of realization. He just had Pacino swear to him that his check has not been deposited. Only for Kevin Spacey swear that the check absolutely has been deposited less than a minute later. The way he looks at Pacino and just knows he's being lied to. He just backs away and leaves as everything roils through his mind.
Of course, David Mamet, the creator, is pretty skilled.
Ever seen Breaking Bad? It's like when a certain character is just sitting on a toilet, reading a book..
You mean like in 2016 when everyone on the left was surprised that Trump didn't lose every single state?
+17 for Biden in Wisconsin; WTF were "pollsters" smoking with that conclusion. That some crazy grass right there. BTW, everyone please watch the People's Pundit a.k.a. Richard Barris. I'm sure everyone here is familiar with him now but he's like one of the only pollsters I trust and his audience is criminally small despite the growth he has experienced recently.
Funny... After 2016, the first thing I said was "Shit, I guess they actually do count the votes!" How wrong was I! Probably cheated then too, just not enough. They had their wake up call. And the BIG steal was on.
The DNC has directly cheated to some significant degree in every election that the DNC has been around for. I would bet all that I have on it.
Those that were saying that the mid terms were a test run for the rampant cheating we saw on Nov 3rd.
I also just saw that wikipedia states that Biden defeated Trump in the election. The gaslighting is real folks.
Same. After 2016, I thought it's a proof that American democracy still works.
I assume they underestimated Trump. Just like they did this time - That's why they had to stop counting, to cheat even harder!
True
That is exactly what their plan is.
That is what they want
I really wish they would call for an inspection of all of the transcribed ballots Trump is talking about. It won't translate to the 90K votes he thinks it will, because there are only 30,000 or so of these damaged/transcribed ballots in total. However, that investigation and inspection would show a clear pattern and lead to actual full investigation. Full investigation will find the fraud here, and in other states. This will pave the way for electors in other states to vote for the actual winner of this election.
Agreed, i'd at least like to see an image of the missing vote one. What seems to have been missed is the explanation for it which is sus af:
"vote for Trump was cancelled when the reproduced ballot contained votes for both the Republican incumbent and a write-in candidate"
A write-in? In a duplicated ballot for Trump?
Thats not a mistake thats SABOTAGE. #beastieboys
Yeah a so called “overvote” it does naturally happen at some small rate. It’s normal (in most elections). People screw up their ballots some of the time 🤷♀️But this isn’t a normal election.
Edit: I’m afraid the overvotes will be hard to contest. And if they were smart they overvoted on Biden ballots too, just at a lower rate. The clear flips are the ones they will sink them.
I think you are misunderstanding the specifics here.
They did an audit of 100 ballots from a pool of 28,000.
Those 28,000 ballots were ones that were duplicated, manually by a human in the poll location, due to the originals being spoilt. These duplicated ballots should be pristine and reflect the original spoilt ballot vote.
When they examined these 100 duplicated ballots, one of them was reproduced with a mark for Trump (correct reflection of the original vote on the spoilt ballot) AND a write-in (wtf? this isnt just a little extra dot) which would cause it to be an overvote and thus take away a Trump vote.
Why would anyone duplicate a spoilt ballot only to produce a pristine overvote/invalid ballot?
To be clear, the original would not need to be duplicated if the issue was merely that it was an overvote - it would remain that way and be accepted as such, like the pristine duplicated one was.
Interesting. One wrinkle here is that a Democrat and Republican duplicate the ballots together. It’s not just one person.
You're making several assumptions
Etc etc
It's not actually evidence unless they report it.
taps head meme
Oh if they're forced to report on it because the story starts gaining its own momentum, it'll just be the ol' tried-and-true "Trump took to the air to ramble on about conspiracy theories"
Once you know the shit they serving is human waste and meat, you never take anything from them any longer, how do your eyes are? After realizing you never used then? (Matrix reference, no ill intend!)
Are you having a stroke?
Fuck off shill!
"It was actually only 2 votes!"
I literally saw asshats on Twatter saying this.
That is the perfect response to them. Watch them melt down trying to reply.
These people are really bad at math.
If there's a 100 ballots, and Candidates Micky Mouse and Roger Rabbit each achieve 50 in the original count, only to later find out that 10 of Micky's votes were actually Roger's, fixing that boosts Roger to +20.
One vote for Trump was seemingly ignored, but giving Biden his vote was the equivalent of 2 ballots being ignored.
came here to say this. lmao
I love how all retards who aren't keeping track of what's going on and have no idea what's going on, are the same retards saying that there's no evidence.
Now they are sharing the story of Barr something about there being no evidence of voter fraud.
Yeah I saw that but of course no actual quote from Barr
NPCs
You could have Joe Biden confessing to it on video and they wouldn't care. Wait, that already happened.
That pot yall always talking about with the frog on the burner? The water has been roiling for almost an entire month...
FUCK JACK DORSEY. CHARGE HIM WITH TREASON AND IMPLEMENT AN APPROPRIATE PUNISHMENT
LIKE HANGING
does anyone have the rope?
I got a car battery and gator clips.
We're gonna need some more voltage
Volts don't kill you. Amps do.
The human body has a threshold resistance so it acts a little like a zener diode wherein not much happens until a certain point. You need about 40V plus to be able to break through that unless it's like an ungodly amount of amps. Even the 1000A a car battery can deliver won't do much other than maybe hurt a bit.
ElectroBOOM video for moar knowledge! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDf2nhfxVzg
Can confirm. You can touch both posts of a car battery without so much as a tickle.
If you are lacking in volts you will fail in amps .
Sexy... Hello.
He could be the first ornament on the Rockefeller Center Christmas tree.
Let the owl pick his bones clean while we are at it
Bullets are cheaper.
I'm sure we could make one out of his stupid hippie beard.
Sorry I sold mine to some fine looking nigerian chaps in downtown chicago a few months back.
The penalty for treason is ???
What about a wood chipper hanging off a helicopter that we throw them in?
What about a wood chipper that's dangerously low on gas?
Oops, sorry we only made it half way, hang on gotta get more gas, brb.
Hey, the vote counters went home in the middle of counting....so fair is fair.
I'm still getting pissed thinking about that when it happened. It's so obvious there's fraud happening.
now i gotta watch that tucker and dale vs. evil movie XD
That tag is fucking automatic regardless of truth.
Trump wins and resumes his 2nd term: this claim is disputed and misinformation.
I want to shove fraudulent mail in ballots down Dorsey's throat until he passes out, once he wakes up, rinse and repeat
... would that be a new type of water boarding?...”Ballot Boarding” until he confesses/spills the beans (or maybe guts).... then a few more times because they just fucking deserve it
I love that he said 3%.
It was technically 2%, put he said 3% so now the media would be forced to cover his error, when they otherwise would have never said anything at all.
he said 3% because 1 vote was changed from Trump to nothing, and the other Trump to Biden. So that's a net of 3 vote gain to Trump
Missing Vote | -1 Trump, +/-0 Biden
Switched Vote | -1 Trump, +1 Biden
Subtotal | -2 Trump, +1 Biden
Net TOTAL | 3pt swing, 3/100 = 3%
Math is racist, but this checks out.
I deported you for racism!
Your updoot ratio is 10/0! That's division by zero! I depooted you for maths!
Hey, 10/0 is the type of math I like to see!
Stable genius.
That's a long hand way of saying "I learned to code." Why must you shame journalists?
Only a nonhuman would fail to shame journalists
Heretic! Racist! 2+2= 5 bigot!! Reeee
It's a 3 vote net gain but still only 2% of ballots being at issue.
Right, but he said "votes cast" not "individual ballots" the discrepancy is equal to three votes, ergo it was not a mistake.
Then the votes cast only decreased by one since the other switched. You have to be consistent in what you're calculating and not compare apples to oranges.
Upvoted for using the word ergo.
No. Imagine the score is 100 Biden - 100 Trump
+1 Trump vote +1 Trump vote -1 Biden vote
99 biden, 102 Trump
My bad. I thought you were saying the vote was changed from Trump to Biden after they inspected them. Not that they were fraudulently changed from Trump to Biden during the election.
No it'd have a net impact of three vote gains for Trump. Trump gains the one that was not counted, and gains one from the one that was erroneously counted for Biden, making it -1 for Biden, +2 for Trump, net +3 for Trump.
Biden would lose 1 and Trump would gain 2 - so a net of 3 votes for Trump.
Let's just say it was 100 ballots, and 48 votes for Trump and 51 for Biden. 99 total votes, one no-vote ballot. A 3 vote gap, however.
Biden loses one and drops to 50. Trump gains the missing vote plus the reversal from Biden and also moves to 50, and we've got a tie, erasing a 3 vote gap.
This is just hypothetical to make it easier to understand,
Missing Vote | -1 Trump, +/-0 Biden
Switched Vote | -1 Trump, +1 Biden
Subtotal | -2 Trump, +1 Biden
Net TOTAL | 3pt swing, 3/100 = 3%
I’ll fuckin do it again
This was the correct answer
I may be wrong, but in the morning I’ll be right, and you’ll still be a nerd faggot.
You keep telling yourself that.
It was 3 percent because 1 ballot was switched. which is trump plus 1 and biden minus 1.
It was 1 vote not counted. 1 vote switched from Trump to Biden. Switching a vote counts as two because you both remove a vote from Trump and add one to Biden. Total shift is 2 votes. Not counting counts as 1. Total error=3%. He's 100% right
Ok this makes sense. I was wondering about that. It's better because then they fall into the trap of "was it 2 or 3?" HMM MAYBE WE SHOULD INVESTIGATE MORE?
If Micky Mouse and Roger Rabbit each receive 50 votes in a precinct with 100 ballots, only for Roger to later learn that 10 of those ballots he received were really for Micky, that puts Micky +20, not 10.
Hey lawyers, can we sue twitter for saying "this claim about election fraud is disputed" when there is nothing in dispute about that claim?
Not until section 230 is repealed. When it gets repealed you'll be able to
But this isn't them being allowed to keep stuff on their platform posted by other people. This is them inserting their own editorial on something someone posted on their site. It's clearly outside the realm of what 230 covers.
If anything it shows they're not following 230.
I haven't seen a specific case yet, but I have heard (just from YouTubers etc. Nothing official) that just because of 230 most judges just toss your case anyways because it's hard for them to figure out the scope.
230 is relevant since it establishes the publisher/platform distinction, but that doesn't actually have any legal definition and is mostly just the subject of internet whining.
Exactly.
They're already breaking 230 because they are acting as a publisher not a platform.
Yes, they are acting as a published but they are classified as a platform. If they were classified as a publisher, they would be liable for all content on their site and would be sued in 0.5 seconds.
Well, I wish he were being more accurate here. There are only about 30 thousand of these transcribed ballots in all of Maricopa, and maybe another 20-30K for the whole state. 2% of those is about a 900 vote swing. This /should/ have the media requesting a full investigation into how this happened and a complete audit of every transcribed ballot, they clearly have the originals. I don't see this particular issue translating across the board to every vote, but there is a lot more than this particular issue and we know this, from mail in ballot fraud to "transcription errors". Who knows what other fraud they could find with a full investigation. Probably a lot. It's like a dumpster is on fire and the media is pretending they love being on fire.
Can we sue that dumb bitch CA Johnson for hating America?
THERE IS LITERALLY NOTHING DISPUTED ABOUT HIS STATEMENT YOU FUCKING HOMELESS COMMIE FUCKS
Why dont you just tell us how you really feel:)
Can't say or I'd get banned. This should about sum it up 8:44
+1
we'll need to invent a new language so we can have more angry-looking letters
Please!
THIS DISPOOT HAS BEEN DEBOONKED. TIME TO FILE THE SOOTS.
REBUNKED!
Don't your mean reeeeeeebunked?
OH GOD I’M GONNA DISPOOOOOOOOOOOT
What can I do to actively hurt twitter? How can I best waste their resources, or damage their ability to function? I'm very fed up with their assault on my country.
Legally calling your representatives and telling them to repeal section 230.
Illegally ddos and hacking
It's "as a platform" and applies to everything from the comment section of a recipe article to providing web hosting.
They have servers IRL
All that is backed-up, you would go to jail and they would be up and running in hours.
Oh well, worth a shot.
How well do you know Python or other coding tools?
Programmer by trade. I very much stay away from everything internet-related because it's absolute hell to work with. Guess I could have a script to just click stuff at random 24/7 and keep loading pages.
Can you write an 'Adnauseam' type script that creates fake clicks on Twitter?
Maybe some type of script that constantly downloads random videos? (multiply over hundreds of computers)
Or 6 million Pedes with a Raspberry Pi or Arduino.
Ridicule its users when you run across them in real life. Not too heavily but enough to put some doubt in there.
Get after it sir!!
Mericopa county went from 1.1m votes in 2016 to 2m in 2020. It’s fraud.
Holy shit
no all the lefties tooooootally moved into the big cities legitimately and not in a fraudulent manner so their votes would.... count... twice as hard...
god it's hard to come up with wrong brain thinks
ss https://i.maga.host/fNYZzi3.png
That 90,000 number may very well be true, for many other reasons, and is probably much higher... They seemed to have engaged in every type of fraud possible.
But I believe we're working inside of a universe of "duplicated" ballots, of which I've heard there are 20K - 30K in Maricopa. So I don't think the judge will let them audit any more than that, unfortunately. So hopefully if they audit the 30K, we're talking 900 votes, possibly higher... I'm sure they let us check the ballots that were least likely to have fraud, based on factors like precinct, number of registered GOP, etc.
HOPEFULLY, this would then open people's eyes, and we can get a FULL FORENSIC AUDIT FOR THE WHOLE DAMN STATE.
First domino, then we get PA, MI, NV, WI, and others... at this point who knows how many states are corrupted.
This feels like the Twilight Zone. Why not just check every one of the ~ 20,000 ballots? Why are we dicking around with sample sizes?
That said, I don't think we can extrapolate from the universe of duplicated ballots to the universe of 3 million normal ballots. The normal ballots may or may not have the same error rate as duplicated ballots. We do not know.
due to the manner of error, it is entirely possible that the error would have carried over. uncast ballots and tally switching are distinctly different from duplicate, and the duplicates would arguably be less likely to suffer these flaws, as they are likely from a select sample that was already checked (it's not a bug, it's a feature). the normie batch would be where these two issues would be most often located, because duplicates have been looked through already, and are a percentage, of a percentage of the votes as a whole.
In short, due to the relationship between the three issues (duplicate, uncast, and flipped over) the total tally of the latter two may well be vastly higher in the normal batch, simply because they were not vetted for errors past the initial discovery, unlike the duplicate batch.
I understand that "duplicate ballots" are those failed to get processed by the machine and then visualy inspected, duplicated and re-entered.
Duplicate ballots number about 20,000 from the universe of 3 million ballots.
What are "uncast ballots"? what is the Approximate number of uncast ballots?
What are "uncast ballots"
The vote cast for trump that was not counted. In the 2 found, 1 vote was switched over, the other was one cast for trump, but was never actually counted, so i called it an uncast ballot, because the cast was never added in for trump. They are two separate discrepancies that were unrelated to the duplicates.
There is a universe of "duplicate ballots" which failed to go thru the machine and which were manually recreated and entered. There is opportunity for fraud in this universe of manually created ballots.
There is a universe of normal ballots which did go thru the machine.
We cannot extrapolate the 3% error in duplicated ballots to the machine counted ballots. Leaving aside the vote switching software theory, we should expect that the machine counted ballots to be much more accurate than the 3% error in the manually created duplicate ballots.
to an extent, one of the allegations is in regards to the machine itself, and the actions of the people who put them out there. assuming the allegation and charges are even a quarter true, it flips the state.
https://thedonald.win/p/11Ql6Povx6/trump-breaks-it-down-for-the-nor/c/
Doucey you dumb mother fucker, you got caught!
Who else wants to squeeze Jack Dorsey's nuts in a vice (vise?) when you read that "this claim about election fraud is disputed." ???
Assuming he has any would be a stretch.
Why the fuc k does Trump continue to use Twitter?? Use Parler. Million will follow him there.
It's to force the media to see it and fight it and expose their hand.
It sucks but it's necessary. Basically it's bait.
So we won Arizona....
Someone explain how this doesn't grant us Arizona?
The courts will do nothing, I would not rest the fate of our freedom with the corrupt courts, especially after many courts spent the past 4 years overruling everything Trump did just to get overturned by the supreme court down the road.
Because this doesn't apply to the entire state, just the 20k duplicated ballots in Maricopa.
I want to say that's harsh but it's 100% accurate
FUCK'EM UP
Progress ! Go Kelli and company, thank you for your hard work, and thank you to the judge!
What on earth is disputed about this?
Reality, probably.
To the SCOTUS. NOW.
https://thedonald.win/p/11Ql6Povx6/trump-breaks-it-down-for-the-nor/c/
2% but he knows what he's doing
Perfectly calculated to troll the libs :D
Flip Arizona and send Faux News down the gutter!
The scale of the fraud perpetrated on America is staggering.
https://thedonald.win/p/11QS2vdJih/no-evidence-nope--none-at-all-ho/c/
Awesome that more are going allowed to be sampled.
I feel like he simply left out the word "imagine" in the tweet.
I swear I'm sick of seeing those tags on the president's tweets. Dorsey needs to be hung for treason.
!
This claim about math is disputed
Learn more about how math is racist and disenfranchises lesbians
are u just memeing or is this real mathematic ??
Inb4
"STATISTICS DON'T SCALE LINEARLY!!!!!" after four years of their small sample size bullshit and them saying that it does
The 100 count vote was duplicate ballots only though...
Right but duplicate ballots are supposed to be carefully scrutinized by at least two poll observers. If you got 3 out of 100 that are no good, that's pretty bad reject rate.
Yeah the sample was only duplicate ballots and there's only about 20k of those. So it'd be about 600 votes. We need a signature verification on the rest
Depends on where those ballots are from. I suspect the "mistake rate" is much higher in Phoenix and Tucson. Where were those two ballots from?
It would be 1,000 ballots at the inspected rate. That's significant; approximately 10% of the difference in the current race tally.
Right but there are still tainted ballots that are not duplicate ballots.
In one county though right ?
From the AZ testimony I thought I heard some workers were tearing the ballots on purpose in order to send to the duplication room
The Dems messing with AZ hits me personally, its my home state.
I have spoken to people I didn't even know personally since the "election". and the majority are angry or concerned about this fiasco.
No, this is not "disputed" Twitter. You fucking assholes.
All absentee ballots and mail-in ballots. Can't find the actual numbers.
101
/s
Retarded judge lets them have a measly 100 "random" ballots and the judge is laughing to himself that they will never find fraud.
finds fraud in that 100
Judge sweating and looks like a fool then suddenly the Maricopa supervisors (criminals) say "no need to check ALL the ballots, just check these 2500! We dont want to bother the courts after all." :) The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors stepped in later in the day to announce it would voluntarily provide up to 2,500 more ballots for inspection "to ensure confidence in the election results," rendering a court order unnecessary.
Yea no. fuck you.
LOL they thought theyd give us a statistically insignificant sample size and we would find nothing.
I dispute the fact that Jack Dorsey deserves to live.
How is the claim disputed? He's referencing the actual fucking data.
Can we please fucking send Jack to prison already?
That's true but they were only given that small sample size. Have to take what you can get. I agree and we should do a 3,000 recount just to make sure!
Lol he’s going to pull this off
Everyone is going to be so pissed off
I love it
Lol, the disclaimer literally just leads to a page saying voter fraud is rare in the US.
Not an argument, and, proven wrong wrong anyways, and again, how rare it is is not relevant to whether it happened or not.
There was never proof of election interference from russia in earlier elections. But according to them it still happened.
Time to send these traitors to their crossroads.
Doesn't this fit in with the 3% algorithm, or am I at brain overload? 🤔
Brrrt DISPOOT DISPOOT
Let me guess.. All of the "mistakes" favored Gropey Joe.
What part of this is disputed? F twatter
Ha ha, "3%". Watch the fake news fact check this, "it was only 2%!!!!"
Every. Dang. Time!