They actually did but China simply isn't reporting it.
China handled this "pandemic" properly. You see, China had huge lockdowns that they broadcasted worldwide and among their own people. It was all propaganda. Then China simply said they "got rid of the virus", except the virus is spreading through its population the same as Sweden. The numbers are hidden among flu deaths and other deaths etc... just like Sweden. Sweden has had 0 additional deaths this year and neither has the USA so neither will China.
The proper course of action to take regarding covid-19 was literally 0 action. China accomplished this by pretending they got rid of the virus with their over the top lockdowns that was pure propaganda.
The rest of the world are a bunch of idiots, though the west is trying to use this plandemic to push the great reset and take over our rights in order to consolidate wealth and power among the elite, so they know what they're doing. The public is still too ignorant and scared to understand that literally doing nothing is the proper way to handle covid-19.
yes it's entirely plausible that letting the virus run rampant would be the least painful way to handle it. Most people are unharmed by it. Just isolate people that are above an acceptable threshold of risk.
You don't even need to do that. There was evidence analyzed by a professor at John Hopkins University that has since been taken down because it doesn't suit the narrative but they found no additional total deaths yoy due to covid-19 even among the high risk groups in the USA. They found all covid-19 deaths are offset by reduction in other deaths such as heart disease, flu, etc... Meaning, most of the high risk people who died of covid-19 likely were going to die of something else anyway. The number of people that wouldn't have died unless they caught covid-19 are statistically insignificant.
That means one thing. The correct course of action is literally nothing.
It's a single study, and if you have noticed, every single study about coronavirus or anything else has another study that says the opposite. I'm going to ignore that study and just use judgement. We do know that the death rate increases amongst older people or certain medical conditions. It is logical then to act for those few people. It is totally illogical to shut down a college or have social distancing at a college, where the students are more likely to die of almost anything else before the Kung Flu.
They actually did but China simply isn't reporting it.
China handled this "pandemic" properly. You see, China had huge lockdowns that they broadcasted worldwide and among their own people. It was all propaganda. Then China simply said they "got rid of the virus", except the virus is spreading through its population the same as Sweden. The numbers are hidden among flu deaths and other deaths etc... just like Sweden. Sweden has had 0 additional deaths this year and neither has the USA so neither will China.
The proper course of action to take regarding covid-19 was literally 0 action. China accomplished this by pretending they got rid of the virus with their over the top lockdowns that was pure propaganda.
The rest of the world are a bunch of idiots, though the west is trying to use this plandemic to push the great reset and take over our rights in order to consolidate wealth and power among the elite, so they know what they're doing. The public is still too ignorant and scared to understand that literally doing nothing is the proper way to handle covid-19.
yes it's entirely plausible that letting the virus run rampant would be the least painful way to handle it. Most people are unharmed by it. Just isolate people that are above an acceptable threshold of risk.
You don't even need to do that. There was evidence analyzed by a professor at John Hopkins University that has since been taken down because it doesn't suit the narrative but they found no additional total deaths yoy due to covid-19 even among the high risk groups in the USA. They found all covid-19 deaths are offset by reduction in other deaths such as heart disease, flu, etc... Meaning, most of the high risk people who died of covid-19 likely were going to die of something else anyway. The number of people that wouldn't have died unless they caught covid-19 are statistically insignificant.
That means one thing. The correct course of action is literally nothing.
It's a single study, and if you have noticed, every single study about coronavirus or anything else has another study that says the opposite. I'm going to ignore that study and just use judgement. We do know that the death rate increases amongst older people or certain medical conditions. It is logical then to act for those few people. It is totally illogical to shut down a college or have social distancing at a college, where the students are more likely to die of almost anything else before the Kung Flu.
The flu has increased death rate among old people, so does cold, pneumonia, any bacteria infection, etc... We still don't do anything about it.