3815
Comments (186)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
0
zipodk 0 points ago +1 / -1

No shit we shouldn't make false statements but that in no way means we are under oath. It also doesn't open us up to perjury, but rather an ethics violation. One major hint of that fact is you cited a (model, not state specific) ethics rule and not a court procedure or state statute. But you'd know that if you had half a brain or half a law degree. You're a great example of larping though, so glad you showed up and both made and demonstrated your point about people being uninformed.

Edit: going on about how the ethics rule has been adopted.... and still isn't a court procedure or state statute.. why such toxic and uniformed people waste their time with being wrong and loud about being wrong, who knows. Go back to reddit.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
zipodk 0 points ago +1 / -1

Classic dodge of the crux

And as a lawyer "in some form" isn't "adopted", they're a model, which I said

0
MAGAmigo 0 points ago +1 / -1

RPC 3.3 is the law in all 50 states

You must be a disaster in Court. Your malpractice carrier must hate you.

1
zipodk 1 point ago +1 / -0

When I'm.... "Under oath" lol

Give it up champ

1
zipodk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Again that doesn't mean anyone is sworn

If we are talking about people who hate people, it is unfortunate you carry such a burden of failure in life that you need to be both uninformed and so vocal about it