Crowder also presented that evidence last week. Zero registered voters in some precincts, other precincts with 100%+ turnout. If you ask why the poll books aren't off, maybe look at the fucking poll books first!
Remember Pinochet seized dictatorial power, destroyed the communists, then peaceably left office after restoring constitutional democracy? I'm fine with a short period where we do without commies involvement in choosing government.
Go back and watch it. How many times did she reference things she wasn’t a witness to. I.e things like in insinuating stuff about the warehouse she never went to.
She should have stuck to how the ballots were being run through the machines and the data loss. She just came across as hyper partisan and not as convincing/reliable as the others. Even though the main thing she was there to speak about was very important and should have come across as credible.
The point is to win with convincing testimony that compels the legislature to action. She was trying to win Jerry Springer.
I agree she has courage to testify but she was all over the place talking about things she wasn’t a witness to.
That makes you lose credibility in any legal or legislative function. That combined with her affidavit being signed so many days after the election makes her less compelling then the other ladies.
One of them reported and signed an affidavit the same day. Also providing all the ballot numbers, names and supporting evidence. That came across as something no one could easily dismiss.
It's called various witnesses. Different people react differently. She also contacted the FBI. A court has no reason to look down on her for her reaction.
You could certainly be correct. Obviously others are reacting to her much differently then me. It’s possible legislators might prefer her over the one I liked.
Everything that you hold dear makes a 3-mile-long, feces-and-vomit-hauling train wreck look like the most beautiful visage ever gazed upon by human eyes.
Crowder also presented that evidence last week. Zero registered voters in some precincts, other precincts with 100%+ turnout. If you ask why the poll books aren't off, maybe look at the fucking poll books first!
She's our new queen, it appears.
Long may she sit on the throne. And by throne I mean my face.
The perfect patriot waifu that every male-pede deserves.
maga goddess incarnate
Yes please.
Queen is still Melania, First Lady of the United States, first of her husband's three terms.
She can be a princess. Or a noblewoman.
Remember Pinochet seized dictatorial power, destroyed the communists, then peaceably left office after restoring constitutional democracy? I'm fine with a short period where we do without commies involvement in choosing government.
Hail to the queen
whats her name?
She looks like a Tiffany.
Tiffany has entered the chat
"I signed an affidavit under penalty of perjury did you?"
Baldy got crushed 🤣🤣🤣
Sticky
From: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eUjTOSDZ0BE
starts at 1 hour 57 min in
Love this momma pede!!
She has stirred things in me more than I can admit
ZERO
Democrat destroyer.
She brought her A game. The left didn't
She is a train wreck, sorry
Your username is a lie. You wear stolen MAGA.
Go back and watch it. How many times did she reference things she wasn’t a witness to. I.e things like in insinuating stuff about the warehouse she never went to.
She should have stuck to how the ballots were being run through the machines and the data loss. She just came across as hyper partisan and not as convincing/reliable as the others. Even though the main thing she was there to speak about was very important and should have come across as credible.
The point is to win with convincing testimony that compels the legislature to action. She was trying to win Jerry Springer.
She'll be running for (and winning) a congressional seat in 2020.
Doesn't matter. She has far more courage than you do.
I agree she has courage to testify but she was all over the place talking about things she wasn’t a witness to.
That makes you lose credibility in any legal or legislative function. That combined with her affidavit being signed so many days after the election makes her less compelling then the other ladies.
One of them reported and signed an affidavit the same day. Also providing all the ballot numbers, names and supporting evidence. That came across as something no one could easily dismiss.
It's called various witnesses. Different people react differently. She also contacted the FBI. A court has no reason to look down on her for her reaction.
You could certainly be correct. Obviously others are reacting to her much differently then me. It’s possible legislators might prefer her over the one I liked.
Persuasion is more complicated than just bringing facts
The left knows this which is why 99% of what they talk about is emotion
This lady brought up what she witnessed AND her own sass
I agree she would not be a good witness in a court of law, but in this setting she's great
Everything that you hold dear makes a 3-mile-long, feces-and-vomit-hauling train wreck look like the most beautiful visage ever gazed upon by human eyes.
Copulate preposition.