I wouod find it hard to believe that with the size of her portfolio there wouldnt be significant dialogue. That type of business relationship also creates plausible deniability for the client that has inside knowledge. Meet over lunch give the info then both parties get the financial benefit with no provable trail.
Significant accountability, yes. Routine dialog might include trade notifications (which can be easily ignored), detailed monthly statements, meetings maybe 1-2 times a year. Give accountability and results, and the conversations can be minimal.
I get that a legitimate operation would do that. But what I'm saying is it creates the environment to enable the fraud if one were wanting to engage in it.
I wouod find it hard to believe that with the size of her portfolio there wouldnt be significant dialogue. That type of business relationship also creates plausible deniability for the client that has inside knowledge. Meet over lunch give the info then both parties get the financial benefit with no provable trail.
Significant accountability, yes. Routine dialog might include trade notifications (which can be easily ignored), detailed monthly statements, meetings maybe 1-2 times a year. Give accountability and results, and the conversations can be minimal.
I get that a legitimate operation would do that. But what I'm saying is it creates the environment to enable the fraud if one were wanting to engage in it.