116
posted ago by Cali_Republican ago by Cali_Republican +116 / -0

They are literally restating affidavits that are under oath.

Comments (9)
sorted by:
9
Wrexxis780 9 points ago +9 / -0

Democrats are retarded. End of story.

6
KeepCoom 6 points ago +6 / -0

Johnson was grandstanding. She's garbage.

3
Alpha_Lemming 3 points ago +3 / -0

af·fi·da·vit /ˌafəˈdāvit/

noun LAW

a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court.

3
AmericanMonarchist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its a signal to the media to run the headline: "Trump 'witnesses' refuse to go under oath during hearing"

Technically true, but not actually true.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
LuckyLuciano 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its a ploy. She wants them under oath in her committee cause if she finds one word different from what was originally said. She’ll pursue perjury chargers.

1
LuckyLuciano 1 point ago +1 / -0

But with that confidence her scare tactic didn’t work

1
Alpha_Lemming 1 point ago +1 / -0

You expect the truth from people who are desperate that Biden wins, to the point of treason?

1
Cali_Republican [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well no, but the Dems at the hearing are making a scene about having the witnesses put under oath. It's not a court, but they're restating at the hearing what is under oath in their affidavit