The same people who considered one "witness" testimony during Impeachment as evidence are now saying 1,000s of testimonies don't prove voter fraud.
(media.patriots.win)
🤡🌎 HONK HONK 🌎🤡
Comments (23)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
LOL
mind you. these are also the same shitheads who routinely employ appeal to popularity and authority fallacies "look these 100 scientitsts said it was true so its totally true bro!"
Its Truth vs Lies. Lies sell easier because no one wants to deal with the reality that everything is corrupt and Evil. That we are seriously in the midst of a revolution for our freedoms and we all know what that means if the law doesn't take the citizens side.
If Law fails then we all know that the system needs to be "reset".
According to the demoncrats, you have to be a marxist professor or politician to have a voice. Anyone else is a conspiracy theorist
or work at CNN
Same things.
They made life hell for Justice Kavanaugh based on the FALSE testimony of ONE person!
"RETARDS"
It's even worse than that.
Blasey Ford: "Kavanaugh raped me! I cannot provide any date, locations, or any details at all. Literally nothing. NOTHING. I. WILL. NOT. TELL. YOU. LITERALLY. ANY. THING. Just arrest him now!"
Dems: "Holy shit, this is so much proof and evidence."
Vote/Election Fraud Witnesses: "At this specific date. At this specific time. This specific person or people. Did this specific thing TO this specific thing. And in some cases we may even have additional evidence such as video/photo/etc. to corroborate our testimony"
Dems: YAWN. Wake me up when you have actual evidence.
There is one thing David Wood said about fedora atheists, that refuse to even accept the historicity if Christ even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
"People have different settings of their skeptic meter, some require more evidence than others to change their mind. When people don't really want to believe you and only pretend to listen to your argument in good faith and already know they won't be convinced for "lack of evidence" they are setting their skeptic meter into overdrive. Given the unreasonable burden of proof they require, I like to simply turn things around and ask them to convince me THEY exist, and I, too, can turn my skeptic meter real high in that case"
Democrats seem to act basically the same, we should take his advice and ask them to prove there WASN'T fraud, and be extremely hard on them.
Actually, It’s Lt Colonel Witness. Thanks
If only we had an anonymous source familiar with Biden's thinking...
Good point!
ALIENS
They much prefer unnamed sources over real people.