3233
Comments (210)
sorted by:
235
DangleBarry 235 points ago +239 / -4

My bet is Andrew Breitbart would side with Lin Wood.

98
deleted 98 points ago +99 / -1
65
deleted 65 points ago +66 / -1
61
Wtf_socialismreally 61 points ago +62 / -1

Trump used to be too.

This was a major sticking point during the primaries for the 2016 election. Establishment Republicans kept reeing that Trump wasn't "conservative enough"

38
4more 38 points ago +39 / -1

A good percentage of people that come here including myself were.

18
TheMoreYouKnowOkay 18 points ago +18 / -0

Pence also. Reagan too.

16
Prussian_Pepe 16 points ago +16 / -0

Sam Donaldson talking to Reagan: "Mr. President, In talking about the continuing recession tonight, you have blamed the mistakes of the past and you've blamed Congress. Does any of the blame belong to you?" Reagan responded, "Yes, because for many years I was a Democrat."

8
DefaultFreedom 8 points ago +8 / -0

What if 1984 was 1984?

6
Kompromat 6 points ago +6 / -0

Democrats went full fucking psycho in just the last 10-15 years as we all watched.

They've aligned themselves with only the worst of the worst causes now.

We all know they're the party of scum, crime, and handouts.

But they ceded labor and production; now THEY are the globalist elitist faction.

What's left to support, if you're a sane, productive individual?

3
AmericaWillSurvive 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump became a republican during R.W. Regan's presidency

Changed to Reform party during B.J. Clinton's presidency

Changed to Democrat party the year G.W. Bush was elected

Changed to Republican the year B.H. Obama got elected

33
nakedjay 33 points ago +35 / -2

Breitbart was a former Democrat who helped found the Huffington Post. You damn well know he would be on Lin's side.

27
TheMAGAnificent 27 points ago +27 / -0

I would bet almost 50% of TD is former Dems.

8
2ScoopsofCovfefe 8 points ago +8 / -0

Huffington post was originally a right leaning site until ariana huffington switched parties. Andrew was not a democrat.

4
jamesgallden 4 points ago +4 / -0

I thought in his college years he was?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
21stCenturyPatriot 9 points ago +11 / -2

I think we should save the senate because if the democrats get control of the senate then all this work to give Trump a second term is a waste - he’ll be a lame duck, or worse, they’ll really impeach him.

6
SnowflakeJuice 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not only that, but the Dems running for Senate in Georgia are Fuckin Marxists

0
Jimbo28a 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well stated, but a bit too complicated for many here...I guess.

3
BillBarrsSkelatons 3 points ago +3 / -0

Killers usually get along

92
kanabiis 92 points ago +96 / -4

What the fuck has Breitbart done to stop the steal? Strongly worded articles?

Fuck anyone standing in the way of freedom and the Republic.

I don't give a shit if all Trumps lawyers voted for Joe Biden, justice is justice.

Actually, if all of Trumps lawyers voted for Biden I would believe it more, because patriots don't put party above the country.

Fuck anyone who cares who Linn Wood voted for, ballots are secret for this very fucking reason.

Fuck off and die enablers of the theft of the Republic.

56
deleted 56 points ago +57 / -1
14
IncredibleMrE1 14 points ago +15 / -1

Things just haven't been the same there after Bannon and Milo left. The company's drifted away from Andrew's vision.

1
PezzShivers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually it's improved 10x fold since they got rid of Bannon

12
TreyGowdysButthole 12 points ago +13 / -1

Breitbart covers the narrative. They just Ben Shapiro everything "rebutting" the Democrat talking points of the day rather than buzzsawing through everything with the truth and refusing to accept the false premise of the daily narrative.

9
intoseaodb 9 points ago +10 / -1

Hasn't Breitbart simply become the excuse of a channel for CNN "alt-right news" Newspeak bullshit.

2
rootGoose 2 points ago +2 / -0

Breitbart was proactive - they have failed him.

10
glow-operator-2-0 10 points ago +10 / -0

OK, but you'll need to get everyone to another site if you want to nuke it like Fox

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
77
MAGAgirl76 77 points ago +78 / -1

Breitbart hasn’t reported much about the fraud. So their attack on Lin Wood seems a little suspicious on their part.

25
snuggs316 25 points ago +26 / -1

i follow brandon darby on twatter...he works for breitbart; a lot of those "children in cages" and border pix are his. he believes that prez maga/sydney/lin are being led astray by people who will make big $ off of recounts/legal work, and that even if there is fraud, it's not enough to overturn the election. that seems to be the general feeling at breitbart...they've had little of the fraud coverage, but beaucoup about celebrities heading to ga and hating on prez maga. i lost respect for both him and jordan schactel this last week.

18
Titan93 18 points ago +19 / -1

I started getting into Steve Bannon this week. I take it he doesn't have much say in Breitbart anymore

1
PezzShivers 1 point ago +1 / -0

No say at all. They got rid of him after he stabbed the president in the back

2
Titan93 2 points ago +2 / -0

How did he do that?

1
PezzShivers 1 point ago +1 / -0

He said the infamous Trump Tower meeting was treasonous & unpatriotic.

In the Michael Wolff book Mr. Bannon called the meeting between a Russian lawyer and Donald Trump Jounior, son-in-law Jared Kushner and then-campaign chairman Paul Manafort "treasonous" and "unpatriotic."

President Trump released a statement saying,

"Steve Bannon has nothing to do with me or my Presidency. When he was fired, he not only lost his job, he lost his mind. Steve calls the press the opposition party, but he's got a very cozy relationship with reporters who he's been leaking too in order to make himself seem more important than he really is.

10
SnowflakeJuice 10 points ago +11 / -1

Breitbart has gone soft for a while. A lot of celebrity B.S. Even at on point stated that they are gong back to their "roots" by focusing on ridiculing Hollywood.

They are right about the fact that Lin should not have called out Purdue or Laughler. their opponents are straight up Commies

5
Sillylibtards2020v2 5 points ago +6 / -1

They definitely have gone soft. The overall tone from the website is negative based on what articles they decide to publish and how they word the titles. I've been going there less and less because I don't give a damn what some blue haired B list celebrity has to say about Trump supporters. I want actual news.

1
snuggs316 1 point ago +1 / -0

i disagree; where are purdue and loeffler? they weren't at the rally...i don't hear their voices demanding the gov. appoint a special session to deal with the fraud. if they want the office, why aren't they working their asses off for it? he and sydney said ga. shouldn't vote if it's w/ the same fraudulent practices that got us where we are today...hard to disagree with that.

2
SnowflakeJuice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably because a lot of people, including many Republicans aren't aware of the fraud, and think peeple who do are nuts. (just look at some of the comments on here of people talking about their won family).

In a tight race they can't afford to alienate anyone

Laughler maybe a RINO, but her opponent is a Marxist. Purdue was always a strong supporter of POTUS

13
Jimmy_Russler 13 points ago +14 / -1

What's going on with them? Did they sell out for money or something?

20
MAGAgirl76 20 points ago +21 / -1

I’m not sure but it’s been a slow and steady decline since 2016. I just take every article with a grain of salt. They do seem to have an obsession with Rob Reiner’s obsession with Donald Trump that’s kind of weird.

-1
PezzShivers -1 points ago +1 / -2

They actually improved 10 when they got rid on Bannon in like 2017 or 2018

15
Blurpy 15 points ago +16 / -1

I think they are Fauxed.

I am certainly suspicious. The coverage is NOT what it SHOULD be, so they are OUT.

5
SnowflakeJuice 5 points ago +5 / -0

When the leftist press made a big stink about Cambridge Analytica, the Mercers, who were the money behind Breitbart, dis-associated themselves from it.

After that, Breitbart got cucked, because they depended on advertisers to survive. When the Mercers owned it, they didn't give a shit about advertisers or boycotts

3
IncredibleMrE1 3 points ago +4 / -1 (edited)

Did they sell out for money or something?

The Mercers have owned it for a few years now. (The Mercers are also the financiers for Parler.)

2
Jimmy_Russler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never heard of them

1
ImNot_NSA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Breitbarts story was slanted and Lyn easily disproved it by saying he donated money to the right too.

Why did Breitbart attack Lyn? Because he told Georgians not to vote in the runoff. That's not helping the GOP cause

1
rplgn 1 point ago +2 / -1

I kind of agreee..... I am ashamed to say that.

0
Jimbo28a 0 points ago +1 / -1

" So their attack on Lin Wood..."

They're not attacking Mr. Wood, they're just laying out facts so that people on our side make an INFORMED decision as to whether we support Trump, or not.

3
MAGAgirl76 3 points ago +3 / -0

My point is why haven’t they covered the fraud but are “just laying out the facts” (as you to put it)about Lin Wood? The stealing of our election is the biggest story of our lifetime. One would think one of the biggest conservative websites founded by someone who fought against corruption would want to cover blatant corruption. Just my two cents.

51
TrumpIsTheVictor 51 points ago +53 / -2

Breitbart is a joke.

Stop giving them traffic.

14
TheSwiftPepe 14 points ago +15 / -1

The media, all media, is loyal to eachother way before they’re loyal to us. It’s a lesson we’ve learned ten thousand times

46
Grief 46 points ago +48 / -2

I 100% agree with Lin Wood. If the Republicans don't take a stand and stop this fraud by election day in January, they didn't earn the votes. This isn't telling people to NOT vote, this is saying that if the Republicans already gave up and are okay with the Democrats destroying America then it won't make a difference if people vote or not because it'll be stolen, AGAIN, in Georgia. There won't be a need to vote because it's a lost cause.

9
MAGA9428 9 points ago +9 / -0

I think the establishment Republicans need to be afraid that if they don't stand with Trump, we will legitimately abandon them. Stop compromising, stop shilling, stand with Trump now or we will throw them to the wolves in the Democratic Party who will eat them alive and we won't lift a finger to help them.

5
glow-operator-2-0 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agreed. Let's just hurry up the attempt at the reset.

My trigger finger is itchy.

2
ProdigalPlaneswalker 2 points ago +2 / -0

they didn't earn the votes

DO OUR BIDDING!

31
Shaffro 31 points ago +33 / -2

I had to stop going to Breitbart several months ago. Seemed like over sensational news stories. They seemed off for some reason.

27
SurroundedByLibtards 27 points ago +28 / -1

I saw the headline and came here to say that Andrew would be disappointed. Saw the first line of text and just laughed. Glad we're on the same page.

It's like people don't realize that a TON of people have turned their back on the libs since the 2018 midterms. Mostly as a product of covid lockdowns, defund the police, and otherwise insane liberal policies. Not to mention Brandon Straka and #WalkAway who is literally doing God's work.

19
ZombieConstitution 19 points ago +19 / -0

Straight up, there's basically no "conservative" news outlets that I actually trust. I knew years ago that Fox was controlled op and eventually they'd reach a point where they had nothing left to offer at all. And when the plug got pulled on Fox, that meant that the left would need another "right-wing" outlet to try and sway our thoughts with. Honestly, I thought the Daily Caller would be the first "alt-media" to swerve on us, but I suppose Breitbart makes sense, considering what Andrew means to so many of us. Add a little extra sting to the attempt at demoralization.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
glow-operator-2-0 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm OK with the federalist. But they get wishy-washy sometimes

2
Kolob 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Conservative Treehouse is solid

16
HistoryInvestigator 16 points ago +16 / -0

Don't forget that Breitbart dropped Milo and that Ben Shapiro was part of Breitbart and left them when they were getting onboard with populists like Milo.

10
glow-operator-2-0 10 points ago +10 / -0

What happened to that glorious faggot anyway?

Milo was awesome as a troll.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
1
glow-operator-2-0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, he can be annoying after a few minutes. Hopefully, he'll grow into more serious shit like Andy Ngo.

15
bubble_bursts 15 points ago +15 / -0

TD.win is the only source of news we need.

11
jamesvien1011 11 points ago +12 / -1

I have been disappointed in breitbart.

Even before wood, there has been times when I know something important has happened. People here are talking about it and also those on twitter.

But breitbart home page is some generic conservative vs liberal stuff.

Most of their home page is littered with opinions of celebrities.

I have no interest in that.

Opinion pieces like nolte are good

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
3
invalid_data 3 points ago +3 / -0 (edited)

Alex Marlow their editor in cheif is an election fraud denier, he has been spouting for a month it was a conspiracy and wouldn't entertain it, only now is he saying maybe there is some irregularities there. Fuck his whiny arrogant ass.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
TH750 10 points ago +14 / -4

I do think Lin Wood is jumping the shark. Yes I know everyone who is hyped by his rallies disagrees, but if you're going to try to fight with facts, you need to arm yourself properly.

What happened today was not necessarily bad, but it was TOO MUCH, TOO soon. Which leads to the guise of being overzealous.

I think the Trump campaign letting ppl know they are not working w Lin was a good move.

2
vicentezo04 2 points ago +8 / -6

Too many Lin Wood dickriders on this site. He says the right things to pull at people's heartstrings but so far hasnt been able to back it up.

9
basedBlumpkin 9 points ago +10 / -1

Team Trump RT'd the Breitbart article so people need to understand the campaign wants to distance itself. Trump also said to vote in the runoff and he'll be there Saturday. Surely people here aren't insane enough to pick Lin Wood over Trump.

2
Imtrex66 2 points ago +2 / -0

It makes no sense to actively give control of all parts of government to the left. He is a piece of shot for telling people not to vote. There are so many ways that would be better for tactics that don’t shot your own foot off. How about suggest getting all of the state legislature to record their stance and if they refuse then they will be primaried out of office. Wood is tugging at emotions like the left loves to do.

9
BlackHawkClown 9 points ago +10 / -1

Lin Wood is also defending Kyle Rittenhouse.

Sounds like another attempt to divide the 80 million deplorables.

4
Hurlingpigs 4 points ago +4 / -0

Then why did Team Trump tweet it out?

7
Titan93 7 points ago +8 / -1 (edited)

Absolutely. I've yet to see a big conservative voice acknowledge Lins actual point. Instead, it's been drive bys from Daily Wire, and Breitbart, and Dan Crenshaw. The last thing we need is MORE propaganda and hit pieces.

Didn't little Ben vote for Hilary in 2016? Didn't Trump donate to Democrats once upon a time? Pathetic takes, reeking of GOP Rino influence.

Lin's point: Leverage your votes!! Make the swamp rats fight for your vote like Trump fights for you!! This is WAR!! And the fact they think there is a 2022 or a 2024 if this election is stolen is a marvel.

7
MAGA9428 7 points ago +8 / -1

At this point, if a media outlet attacks Lin Wood, Sydney Powell, Rudy Guiliani, or Trump himself. I automatically consider that as a sign the media outlet is compromised by establishment RINOs or leftists.

7
GamebredPitbull 7 points ago +8 / -1

LIN WOOD IS OUT THERE FIGHTING FOR GEOTUS!! I STAND WITH HIM!!

6
BabbleRabble 6 points ago +7 / -1

Andrew Breitbart is dead and his spirit is not to be found at Breitbart.com

6
Olds77 6 points ago +7 / -1

That's such a stupid argument. Trump has won so many over. Even his best lawyer was a never Trumper and now she's fighting for him 10,000 times harder than so many RINOs could ever. Brietbart is largely celebrity gossip. This site is more important than ever and thank fuck we have it!

6
generated_name 6 points ago +7 / -1

It doesn't matter what Lin did or didn't say. People in Georgia are not going to come out and vote for people who haven't been supportive of them and Trump. Especially when the same machines will be used, with the same software and the same process regarding mail-in ballots. And there have already been 900,000+ ballots mailed out thanks to Stacy Abrams' organization.

Should people go out and vote for the Republican senators? YES; but they won't because many of them don't think it will even make a difference, and they don't trust the majority of the Georgia GOP. Unless something changes to restore peoples trust, the GOP can kiss it's senate majority goodbye.

5
21stCenturyPatriot 5 points ago +6 / -1

I think we should save the senate because if the democrats get control of the senate then all this work to give Trump a second term is a waste - he’ll be a lame duck or worse, they’ll really impeach him this time.

5
OllieNorth 5 points ago +6 / -1

Rebekkah Mercer's influence has gotten out of hand. First they slam Doug Collins and put Basketball Barbie on a pedestal that her husband bought her, and now they slam one of the most vocal supporters?

Fuck Breitbart. Fuck Rebekkah.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
4
PTworldwide 4 points ago +5 / -1

Lin Wood is an American patriot. Breitbart...SHAME ON YOU BRIETBART...NOT SO BRIGHT!

3
T2EE 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Breitbart article seemed to be making the point of why would Lin Wood advocate for a boycott of the Georgia runoff by republicans and hand the Senate to the Democrats. Same advise the Lincoln Project losers are giving. I understand being upset about the election, we all are, but to give full control to the Democrats is very scary if the cards don't fall the way we are all working towards. We need to at least have a firewall to support the front line we are trying to hold.

3
Imtrex66 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly, these damn idiots can’t see that if we keep the senate 2022 looks great and sets up a great leg up on 2024 president. At some point we have to come to terms that there is a possibility that the steal work and we were caught with our pants down. Why the f didn’t we (my self included) not stop the steal in June when Trump started warning us? Keep fighting like hell until Inauguration Day. But, at some point we need to make the next two years hell on the Dems and gain control back and keep MAGA alive and well.

0
Burrito_Bandito 0 points ago +2 / -2

the point you are missing is that if they get away with the level of fraud in this election then they will will NEVER stop cheating at this level.

2022? 2024?

There is no 22 and 24 man. You are grossly underestimating how much these people hate you and how much they need power. And the only reason all that will be possible is because fucking republicans backstabbed us. Republicans that want us to vote for them. If we still vote for these fuckers than it will never end. You can either be a sucker or not.

IF Biden takes the WH then its almost better for us to let the dems take full control, fuck shit up real bad and then MAYBE that will upset enough of us to actually do something about all of this. Otherwise its status quo and itll be another 60 years before we have another shot

2
Imtrex66 2 points ago +2 / -0

So giving the Dems total control solves this? It doesn’t make sense. Primary these fucks out in 2022. Take names now on who is fighting, and vote them out in 2022. We are all to blame for the cheating. We let this shit happen. We knew what was going to happen with cheat by mail and we did little to stop it. We should have made these demands in the summer months.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Jimbo28a 2 points ago +2 / -0

None...they're just letting us know who we're dumping Trump for.

3
RedditStillSucks 3 points ago +5 / -2 (edited)

STOP DEMANDING EVERYONE BE 100% PERFECTLY IN ALIGNMENT WITH WHAT YOU WANT ALL THE TIME OR YOU WILL CANCEL THEM!

JESUS FUCKING CHRIST YOU ARE JUST AS BAD AS LIBERALS THAN AND YOU WILL HAVE NO ONE ON YOUR SIDE.

ITS ONE FUCKING ARTICLE THAT MAKES LIN WOOD LOOK MORE OBJECTIVE. ONE FUCKING ARTICLE. ONE.

AND YOU WANT TO CANCEL BREITBART?!?!?!

YOU ARE A LIBERAL GASLIGHTING SHILL TRYING TO TEAR ALL CONSERVATIVE GROUPS APART.

3
RexCollins 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lin Wood needs to pick if he is going with PR or lawfare Its hard to win over a skeptical judge when he sees you rallying like that.

There is a reason the media focuses on Lin Wood

3
Kek_Priest_Wunderbar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Order of operations. Trump> Lin Wood> Breitbart

3
Ldyluna 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nationaly, the average percentage of lawyers who donate Dem is 93%. While most, especially the younger ones truly are lefty libtards, not all are. The Bar Association is unbelievably clique-ish, and extraordinarily intolerant of political diversity. Some lawyers give to Dems simply to protect themselves and their firms.

Having said that, I found myself questioning Lin Wood's hyper aggressive 'burn it all down' tone yesterday. Sydneys' tone was much more restrained and laser focused on the the Steal on 11/3/20, and on preventing a second Steal in the run offs. It sounded like Lin's intention was to start a war.

While I support an all options approach to setting right the fraudulent election, we have not exhausted all legal options yet.

The reality is that biting one's nose to spite one's face is always stupid.

Georgians must show up and vote to keep the Senate out of commie hands!!!!

3
mostooge 3 points ago +3 / -0

I trust no one. Trump says vote. He got as much intel as anyone. So I think all Georgians should vote republican. Hell, make them cheat again.

3
Jimbo28a 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yea, our strategy seems to be that since the Dems got away with big-time cheating against Trump, and we don't like cheating, we're going to eliminate the need to cheat and help the Marxists win OUTRIGHT!!!

...and we think they're idiots?

1
mostooge 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly

3
Ivleeeg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Breitbart isn't compromised. We have to stop with thinking that anyone who doesn't 100% toe every line we draw is compromised. This is America and there are lots of people with lots of varying opinions. Not every difference of opinion is someone selling out or becoming compromised.

-1
Jimbo28a -1 points ago +1 / -2

Agree - Breitbart is not even close to being compromised. The people who are COMPROMISED are the people on THIS SITE, called The Donald, who are willing to listen to and take orders from shyster lawyer telling them to do exactly OPPOSITE of what President Trump wants us to do.

3
Salt_Cartoonist 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lin Wood is out for Lin Wood. If you need more context watch this vod of Robert Barnes explaining the sloppy cases Lin Wood and SP are filing. enter text

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
9
BigIronBigIron 9 points ago +9 / -0

Holy shit a time traveler

2
frenpede211 2 points ago +2 / -0

Im sure all of us fell for their bs at one time or another. Especially with the fallen messiah and his hope and change platform.

2
TreyGowdysButthole 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's the same playbook the RINO's tried on Trump when he ran in 2016 "Trump VOTED for Democrats and Donated to them OMG!!!" No one gave two shits. Fuck Breitbart and Fuck Drudge and especially FUCK FOX NEWS.

2
swimmingguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a difficult situation. They're both trying to do the right thing. Not big issue to fight over.

2
TaggartCiscontinenta 2 points ago +3 / -1

The problem with Breitbart (one of the rare good ones) is the same as it is with the legacy/mainstream media, namely the demographic that controls it:

Larry Solov, CEO

Alex Marlow, Editor-in-Chief

Wynton Hall, Managing Editor

Joel Pollack, Senior Editor-at-large

2
Bananapirate 2 points ago +3 / -1

You people eat your own just as quickly as Leftists do.

2
ZombieVote2024 2 points ago +3 / -1

I don't agree with everything Lin says but he's got my support. He's here in GA suing the fuck out of the state. What's Breitbart doing to help?

2
snoopy3210 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tell me if I'm wrong but Breitbart was a Democrat at first

2
Sherlocks_Pocket 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed

2
BIVO 2 points ago +2 / -0

Forget Breitbart. There are many good aggregate websites to conservative articles: https://www.citizenfreepress.com/ https://thelibertydaily.com/ https://protrumpnews.com/ https://www.whatfinger.com/

2
dark_webdev 2 points ago +2 / -0

HELL YEAH!

2
truthforchange 2 points ago +2 / -0

For some reason I thought Based BANNON was somehow == Breitbart.

But Brietbart apparently is ran by some billionaires named The Mercers?

Donald Trump Teases 2024 Run: ‘I’ll See You in Four Years’

Story on Breitbart. I get it now.

2
DonttrustChina 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't like Lin Wood telling people not to vote in the runoff though.

1
Shreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
DrainWashington 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do question the "don't vote in the run-off election" bit that Mr Wood and Ali were going on about. WTF good does that do?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
Jimbo28a 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep, we'll reward the Democrats instead by not voting and thus not making them have to cheat.

Sounds like a plan to me!!!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
MikeVicksAstrologist 2 points ago +2 / -0

I say I used to be just another black Democrat too. Now that I'm based, does my past invalidate my love for this president? I think not.

2
semisane17 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lin Wood is the ultimate bait and switch. Vote Republican no matter what. Yes, it's not great but if you vote Democrats Trump is fucking screwed. Don't be stupid!!!