84
posted ago by basedBlumpkin +84 / -0

I'm looking at Wayne county...there are 872,000 votes counted. Was that guy just making up numbers?

Also, his original question is retarded. Let's say there's 500k registered and 250k votes. That doesn't mean ballots weren't scanned multiple times. 150k people could have voted, with 250k votes tabulated.

Comments (15)
sorted by:
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
basedBlumpkin [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

and I guarantee you he didn't write that statement he read to Giuliani at the end.

8
sak951 8 points ago +8 / -0

It all comes back to the poll books not balancing. If the poll books dont balance with the number of ballots that were cast I dont know how they can legally certify an election.

My biggest takeaway from the hearing was IT TOOK 13 DAYS AFTER THE ELECTION for them to return the poll book to the canvassers. HOW CAN ANYONE SAY THAT ISNT SUSPICIOUS?

3
theRealPizzabandit 3 points ago +3 / -0

As many of the folks testified, they were manually updating the poll books with new information as they were counting. The entire operation has to be called into question. There is absolutely no way to verify what was counted and certified.

2
neehl 2 points ago +2 / -0

The question was retarded because hello, we had multiple incidences where Trump ballots were destroyed. 250,000 people could have voted but how do we know the vote they submitted was the vote that was counted? These people are the worst.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
basedBlumpkin [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, to be fair, and that guy was a total douche, there are a ton of cities that make up WAYNE County.

Yeah I considered that, I'm just surprised if he had that actual granular data off hand. He might have been prepped based on that ridiculous statement he read to Rudy. But as we both know, the point he made with that data is absolutely nonsensical.

2
Schiffblower 2 points ago +2 / -0

and they can enter the fake ballots into the poll books he was saying were so accurate

What an ass

2
br1337 2 points ago +2 / -0

They also have had time to manipulate the poll books and maybe we're that night as well? Easily laundered a ton of ballots through there.

2
gnomenclature 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, not the brightest bulb.

1
dindunufin2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lie, Cheat and steal.... it's all they know how to do.

1
ArthurFrood 1 point ago +1 / -0

If I'm not mistaken, the guy that answered his question (Or was up soon after) detailed that a massive number of questionable votes came not from Detroit city, but from specific precincts in the Detroit area. Correct me if I missed a detail or two.

1
ViduusMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was a good point though. I was trying to understand why you needed 23 Machines counting batches of 50 ballots to process 100,000 mail in ballots. (Randomly assuming half of the 200k Detroit ballots were mail in)

The number of counters and equipment at TCF seems like complete overkill for that few votes.

Was it really that low? Are we sure TCF was only counting Detroit votes?

The amount and methods of reported fraud should have totaled much higher then 200k.

I wish people were doing REAL audits with REAL forensic inspection of random ballots.

I also want to know how the county clerk could have manipulated the poll buck to match the ballot totals. I believe fraud happened but how that check and balance was manipulated needs to be figured out.

3
basedBlumpkin [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

We don't know how many voted, was it 100,000 people that counted for 250,000 votes? 150,000 people? We can't know without a forensic audit

2
ViduusMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doesn’t matter. The city is large 200k is nothing. Detroit commits real crimes... they’d have that dial up to 11.

I’m assuming the number was wrong or they were fudging/counting ballots for other cities in Wayne county.