Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
I do not have twitter , nor will I ever, but I did email my MI state senator for my district with a link to his video, I also asked him why he was not in attendance to these hearings to represent MY VOICE, My Families voice, and voices of my neighbors. In witch I voted for him to do so!
The only weakness is that some of the people he called probably don't remember what they did 5 minutes ago, let alone if or how they voted. Average IQ of the folks who he called and they answered seems to be about 75 at best.
Multiple sources confirm this story, it's true.
Fakebook: fact check anyone that disagrees with multiple sources.
Twatter: anyone that says otherwise gets a 'dispooted' warning
Snopes: anyone says otherwise ThIs HaS bEeN DEBOOONKED
There were so many witnesses of fraud that there wasn't enough time for all the hearings to have everyone's testimony. This video needs to be shared to the MI state representatives
Rainn has a long history of taking fact, and using it to paint a narrative. That's not even touching on the "feel" part of the reporting survey or that it's a small sample size. Often under 50k people, focused more on large urban areas where crime is already bad, while ignoring safe areas.
That survey also ignores the 'on the ground' statistics, i.e. actual UCRs, and it also ignores other various things. To give you an example, let's say you have 40 people sexually assaulted. But you only arrest 5 people in connection to it. 4/5 people are innocent because they match the profile given by the victims. One person is the one they're searching for. In their reasoning, because those 4/5 people weren't arrested the criminal is going free.
The real rats are gonna be jumping ship this week I think. They’re not gonna wait till they get caught. It’ll be a race to the witness stand to cop the best plea deal.
I've heard some people say the DOJ is being quite to not alert the traitors as to what they are doing. Not sure what to make of that. Is there a chance that is true?
Underrated comment. Please send to MI state representatives.
Eyewitness testimony is good for in person fraud, and machine / Dominion was discussed, but this addresses mail fraud / absentee ballots and this was not discussed - it needs more attention.
There has been enough from day0 when you look at illegal addresses, date of birth, signatures, laws circumvented by govs illegally, change of address, double vote and dead vote to win all the battleground state margins. That’s not even getting into observers being kicked out and ballots being backdated and trucked in.
Instead of amping those voices up, we get low budget rallies with attention seekers talking about Hugo Chavez, watermark sting ops, “10,000 dead voter lists” from a guy that wants to sell T-shirts and didn’t check the list AT ALL, and completely unprovable (but likely) implications with Dominion.
They’re doing the dramatics and soap box rabble rousing to get the public’s attention. Need as many to wake up as possible right now so when the simple evidence wins in court the majority of people at least know that somethings actually going on and won’t blindly believe the deniers and wool pullers in the media.
Except they’re drawing attention to the shit that we can’t prove. Jesus fucking Christ when are you people going to understand that the hype hype hype machine needs to stop! Stop!
No more wild theories, no more huge conspiracies, no more tinfoil hat bullshit, no more hype and krakens and Q bullshit!
When we don’t produce evidence of these monstrous claims, we look like tinfoil hat wearing fucking bullshit artists. It’s 20 million times easier for the media to spin it that way and for people to believe it.
And the stuff we have evidence for gets ignored more easily that way. No, they are doing more harm than good when they do this. Unless they can finally produced see evidence of their massive, historically huge claims.
This is the only way to draw attention to what's going on. The censorship is so fucking great, they have to scream crazy shit at the top of their lungs to try to break through to people.
And this shit is PROBABLY going on. it's not even that far fetched. You have a company that was created by Chavez to rig his elections for him. The people involved realize that there's a HUGE demand for this. They incorporate. They tailor their software. They then make back door dealings with politicians all over the world promising them how to ensure a win. Then they present to the public about how they're on the up and up with a dog and pony show. They get paid HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS in contracts (fun fact: The Dominion machines? The state doesn't own them. They RENT them.) and they provide support/whatever for them for extra.
This is actually a clever fucking business model. They're a private company so they don't disclose their IP. No one can prove they're rigging it. The states don't own the hardware, so they can't just take one and crack it open without risking litigation. You back door deal with politicians and they keep it quiet because by exposing them, you expose yourself. The dishonesty forces loyalty.
The only real chink in their armor is that they outsource a lot of their IT services and I'm not sure why. I know they can't be in all places at once, but I'd want to see their training documentation for the contracted IT people and what they were contracted specifically to do. It's an all in one solution, so the only reason you'd need IT on the ground is for networking or real basic tech support like, turn it off and on again. Dominion had actual employee's in the key areas though. I'd love to get my hands on internal documentation or even a fucking image of these machines. We don't even need the source code (though that'd be nice since we could see what's commented out and any actual comments from the programmers). We could just decompile the image and reverse engineer.
This stuff isn't as far fetched as you might think it is. They've had years to build it up and perfect it. Years to get connections and deals going. This is actually a well developed con.
That’s 100% false. I am trying to red pill people here and they just keep pointing at the most outrageous and unprovable claims. They are smelling the bullshit there and won’t listen to anything else.
People are drawn to the shiny objects, I can’t get them to focus on the boring provable stuff because they are too busy laughing at the wild, outrageous claims we have absolutely no chance of proving.
Honestly, it’s a strategy the left has employed before, communists have done it throughout history. They did it in Cuba. Create an argument against themselves that is wild and unsubstantiated to distract from the real complaints that have a chance to convince people.
This time we’re doing it to ourselves. We need to stop. I mean many even on our own side are rolling their eyes at the constant tweets of easily disproven claims, and the retweets of clear crackpots who are providing pictures and fake evidence that are immediately discredited, things that are really making us look bad.
“Look at these pictures of shredded ballots I found!!!” and other tweets that are thoroughly disassembled within 10 minutes, but our team has been recycling that shit? It’s embarrassing and needs to stop.
Unfortunately, the poor old woman had no idea that this mongoloid was setting up for her full name to be broadcast to millions of people. Her chimp out was fucking gold though.
"DO YOU BELIEVEZ U AN TRUMPZ ARE HONEZT PEOPLEZ?"
"RIGHT DISHONESTY!!! - THATS WHAT IM SAYINGGG"
Yeah, no excuse for 3hrs. At that point you know it's for show. If they had any interest in the truth, they'd have taken as much time as was needed to hear all the facts. Committee head shows up late, still holds them to the same cutoff time. And the "Yeah, but I don't see how this is going to change the result" is going to start a war. ANY fraud in elections should be punishable by death. That's where I am at this point. I'm done watching the rape of this land. DONE!
Yeah, she had a lot of good info. And she was new to us. With 3 hrs though, there's not a lot of time for lengthy explanation. However, I don't see how else they could've gotten her to testify. She seems very fragile & if Rudy would've pushed her, she could've fallen apart. In the end, it's good we heard her.
Always was. It's all fraud. They've been stealing at least 20% of the vote for decades. Democrat stronghold areas are just areas where Democrats have committed soo much election fraud for soo long that no one even questioned it when they stole them.
I know it’s true, but those Senators seemed to scared of Madea/Cynthia Johnson to do anything about it. They’re going to sit around and make our President do all the work as usual to save this country
The fact that this isn't the top post and same lame ass sarcastic uninformative CNN post is on top shows that we really need to refocus on what is important.
If 24% didn't request them, then that is extra 24% of ballots. If 23% did but didn't get returned then that is minus 23%. The difference is only 1% so it's actually a negligible difference in the net votes. Now of course that 24% extra probably all went to Biden, and the 23% lost probably was all for Trump but when you look at the numbers it's only a 1% difference.
They're two different kinds of fraud. They don't just cancel out. One is proof that clearly someone is requesting mass mail in ballots for people who did not request them, and one is people submitting ballots that for some reason aren't getting counted.
I'm not sure why Braynard focused on asking the group of people that were listed requesting but not submitting a ballot about whether they requested a ballot, and not asking the people that actually voted absentee if they requested and submitted a ballot. Because even though fraudulently requesting a ballot is still fraud, if they didn't vote with it it's kind of a moot point.
The intent of this study is to create a credible justification for throwing out ALL mail-in ballots. If you can prove that a large percentage of ballots sent out weren't genuinely requested it brings into question the validity of the mail-in system. How many mail-in ballots were sent out? How many of them were falsely requested? This analysis creates a single simple solution to explain all the irregularities: widespread organized fraud. If you can prove that you can justify throwing out all the mail-in ballots, which is the goal here. This study certainly helps and I hope it will be enough to at least get a forensic audit of the ballots, but without something really solid (like a whistleblower stepping forward that participated in organized fraud) I don't think this study will be enough by itself to overturn Michigan. Sadly. Perhaps more will come later. I certainly think this study is as compelling, if not more, than any of the testimony from today's hearing. It's a shame it wasn't presented.
You can't just manufacture 50k ballots without the vote totals looking ridiculous. So you have to send out an extra 25k absentee ballots and lose 25k returned ballots. Then you can say "We got exactly as many ballots as we expected, nothing to look at here"
He's not saying the frauds cancel out their effects, he's saying various frauds cancel out their signs.
That tard didn’t listen to a single word that was said at that entire hearing. Every single one of her “questions” was just some race baiting bullshit.
Yea but it's just seems to be them calling random people, asking if they voted in Michigan. They say no, and then they request more info. Do we ever get the follow up of their actual information or confirmation of where/how they voted
I really hope he gets to testify in front of the supreme court. For one, all of this hard work deserves to be recorded in a historic case. He and his team have certainly earned it. I also think he should testify because this is clear evidence of numerous civil rights violations.
I am astonished that this hasn’t happened already. I honestly don’t know what the fuck we’re waiting for. We’re always waiting for something, the entire Republican party, Trump included, always waiting for something. Hell half the people here are still waiting for a plan to punish people who committed crimes in 2015. Still waiting. Patiently waiting.
It doesn't matter, the point is to get it out and get it seen.
You saw this video didn't you? Help put it out there to more of the right people. Besides they do have power on the committee, like it or not. I think the bald guy would actually be the one I would target with this as he seemed like he could be fair, not the other two.
I see that it's 24 minutes long. I haven't watched it. There's too much evidence to spend 24 minutes on a video with no QRD. A lot of people here have maybe an hour between work and the chores and kids. In the future, please summarize the thing you're posting in a comment on the thing you posted if you want people who are pressed for time to know what it said. It would help a lot.
You're right in a way. Most of the video is raw phonecall recordings from people who said they did not request a ballot. The big deal for me is the people who disguised PO Boxes as "Apt #" to get ballots.
I'll agree with you if you haven't spent hours engaging and posting bullshit fantastical conspiracy theories.
Got it, so you're being a doomer and on here criticizing about others' ignorance while doing none of the work yourself because "muh job!" "muh kids!" "muh chores!" please won't someone do the thinking for me?!
Did he say 13% of all absentee voters didn’t request a ballot ? Holy Shit !! That’s over 300,000 votes! I know he’s trying to be analytical about these results but show us some emotion with a result like that.
Notice how a lot of these people that said they didn't request an absentee ballot are elderly people who probably had no idea how to request an absentee ballot. I'm willing to bet hundreds of thousands of family members all over the country got absentee ballots in their parents' names and voted for them. Absolutely sick.
They scheduled 3hrs only. Committee Chair shows up late & says he's still keeping the scheduled cutoff time. New witness speaks first & is very scared & nervous. Provides good info, but very disorganized & lengthy testimony with innumerable pauses & reiterations, jumping around her timeline in a confusing way, to where even Rudy got lost at one point. Mayor would ask her a yes or no question, she'd take minutes to get to the point. Almost every single impactful question by Rudy received a response that deflated the impact.
e.g.
MAYOR: "You said when you turned people away for not having the proper signature that they'd go & vote at another table. Is that correct?"
WITNESS: "Well, you see, when you're going through the process....[ages pass]. I did not actually see them vote at another table. They left, but they could have gone to another precinct."
It was like she had told things a bit differently to Mayor the night before. She had some good info & it was good to hear her testimony. Terrible in person witness though, IMO.
Can I ask...why is it so hard to find a list of email addresses to reach legislature? Is there like a...legislature connection database? Like CRM for public to reach politicians.
So in Michigan - about 3.4 Mail in Ballots were SENT OUT BY THE STATE -
but apparently about 12.6% of those voters DID NOT ACTUALLY REQUEST A MAIL IN BALLOT....
That is about 423,000 Ballots that were 'mysteriously sent out' by the State - and on the request form you can actually ALTER THE ADDRESS that the ballot goes to......
THAT SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN.... There should be NO VOTER who gets a Mail in Ballot without requesting it themselves.
Wait so they let the Indian lady go for 30 minutes but Matt couldn't at all? The first witness should have been coached better or given less time. It was hard to follow and hardly definitive analysis like Matt has.
God bless her, BTW. Just saying a better witness could have been chosen for first up to really get people's attention.
Well, according to ABC news all of this is unfounded and there's no proof of any voter fraud. This is 100% what they said this morning I shit you not. We need to keep this fight up and Trump WILL be reelected despite the fraud and lies.
I heard trump paid him to fabricate all his data. -CNN
From an anonymous source.
Multiple anonymous sources
“psst, we didn’t actually pay anyone right? we don’t have the budget for it anymore” - CNN (probably)
They gave all their money to Nick Sandmann, remember?
Matt Braynard should be the first witness in all future states.
His evidence is irrefutable.
I hope they use recordings of these kangaroo hearings as evidence in the tribunals.
Yes!! His work is easily provable & understandable!
Just what he’s uncovered in a couple COUNTIES is enough to show that Trump was elected during this election!!!
I do not have twitter , nor will I ever, but I did email my MI state senator for my district with a link to his video, I also asked him why he was not in attendance to these hearings to represent MY VOICE, My Families voice, and voices of my neighbors. In witch I voted for him to do so!
And it's the some of the simplest to understand. He explains thing slowly and thoroughly in a way that almost any honest person will understand.
The only weakness is that some of the people he called probably don't remember what they did 5 minutes ago, let alone if or how they voted. Average IQ of the folks who he called and they answered seems to be about 75 at best.
"That's just nuisance money!" -Brian Stelter
*Little Brian Stelter
**Little Brain Stelter
You mean George Costanza?
And soon HERO Kyle!
I could see Lin Wood hiring Kyle as a bodyguard just as a fuck you to the leftists.
Sounds like we're starting our own MAGA Pantheon.
Wait you based pede arnt already invaded.
Gave? Lol. Nick plundered their booty like captain jack sparrow.
Multiple sources confirm this story, it's true. Fakebook: fact check anyone that disagrees with multiple sources. Twatter: anyone that says otherwise gets a 'dispooted' warning Snopes: anyone says otherwise ThIs HaS bEeN DEBOOONKED
my absolute favorite is 'debunked.' 9/10 it's just a link to someone saying you're wrong or that your rightness can't be assured.
That being said - interesting that Twitter did not slap a disputed claim on the video yet.
Verified by authentic source - AP
Multiple anonymous sources familiar with Trump's thinking
Nah all they need is one "source" and it's a story for them!
Sources familiar with his way of thinking.
Well-placed too!
DID SOMEBODY SAY ANONYMOUS SOURCE!??? THAT’S ALL WE NEED! EVAN EVAN EVAN FACT CHECKED IT!
But first, Russia!
Matt Braynards claimed without evidence. -CNN probably
Matt Braynard claims he is Matt Braynard WITHOUT EVIDENCE!!!
I like how CNN tells their viewers anonymous sources are legit with no evidence to back up a claim....
But actual testimonials, data, video evidence, and public whistleblowers on top of people working for dominion are false claims and a bunch of nothing
Drooling mouth breathers are CNN's only remaining audience aside from captives in airports and nursing homes.
There were so many witnesses of fraud that there wasn't enough time for all the hearings to have everyone's testimony. This video needs to be shared to the MI state representatives
Didn't one of the shitbags in the MI committee today asking Mellissa why not many people have stepped forward?
This soft coup's wheels are rapidly falling off.
Yeah, when you ruin someone's life for coming forward, not many will want to
The amount of people that acctually react is quite low.
Eg sexual assualt and robbery has a reporting rate of 1/5 and 1/2 according to this site: https://www.rainn.org/statistics/criminal-justice-system
I wonder where "shady stuff but not obvoius election fraud without further inquiry" would end up in reporting rate.
Rainn has a long history of taking fact, and using it to paint a narrative. That's not even touching on the "feel" part of the reporting survey or that it's a small sample size. Often under 50k people, focused more on large urban areas where crime is already bad, while ignoring safe areas.
That survey also ignores the 'on the ground' statistics, i.e. actual UCRs, and it also ignores other various things. To give you an example, let's say you have 40 people sexually assaulted. But you only arrest 5 people in connection to it. 4/5 people are innocent because they match the profile given by the victims. One person is the one they're searching for. In their reasoning, because those 4/5 people weren't arrested the criminal is going free.
The real rats are gonna be jumping ship this week I think. They’re not gonna wait till they get caught. It’ll be a race to the witness stand to cop the best plea deal.
Who is going to catch them? Donuts Barr? Doubtful, but I'm hopeful. Complicated business folks...let's see what happens.
Soon, but not yet. More things need to play out I suspect.
We also have to assume, and rightly so, that more compromised Republicans will publically side with them.
I've heard some people say the DOJ is being quite to not alert the traitors as to what they are doing. Not sure what to make of that. Is there a chance that is true?
🤞
Underrated comment. Please send to MI state representatives.
Eyewitness testimony is good for in person fraud, and machine / Dominion was discussed, but this addresses mail fraud / absentee ballots and this was not discussed - it needs more attention.
I am sure they would say that they are all lying like that Senator who accused the witnesses of lying to their faces.
Democrats are gold medal winners when it comes to mental gymnastics lol
Don't put anything past them.
They can ignore absolutely anything they don't want to hear.
Serious question - why isn't any of this being presented in court? It's all very compelling evidence and testimony.
They are scared of him
Rudy should put him first for all future states. I believe that he was most effective in convincing AZ state senate, they said he had the smoking gun.
It’s always been this.
There has been enough from day0 when you look at illegal addresses, date of birth, signatures, laws circumvented by govs illegally, change of address, double vote and dead vote to win all the battleground state margins. That’s not even getting into observers being kicked out and ballots being backdated and trucked in.
Instead of amping those voices up, we get low budget rallies with attention seekers talking about Hugo Chavez, watermark sting ops, “10,000 dead voter lists” from a guy that wants to sell T-shirts and didn’t check the list AT ALL, and completely unprovable (but likely) implications with Dominion.
Amp up the signal.
They’re doing the dramatics and soap box rabble rousing to get the public’s attention. Need as many to wake up as possible right now so when the simple evidence wins in court the majority of people at least know that somethings actually going on and won’t blindly believe the deniers and wool pullers in the media.
Except they’re drawing attention to the shit that we can’t prove. Jesus fucking Christ when are you people going to understand that the hype hype hype machine needs to stop! Stop!
No more wild theories, no more huge conspiracies, no more tinfoil hat bullshit, no more hype and krakens and Q bullshit!
When we don’t produce evidence of these monstrous claims, we look like tinfoil hat wearing fucking bullshit artists. It’s 20 million times easier for the media to spin it that way and for people to believe it.
And the stuff we have evidence for gets ignored more easily that way. No, they are doing more harm than good when they do this. Unless they can finally produced see evidence of their massive, historically huge claims.
This is the only way to draw attention to what's going on. The censorship is so fucking great, they have to scream crazy shit at the top of their lungs to try to break through to people.
And this shit is PROBABLY going on. it's not even that far fetched. You have a company that was created by Chavez to rig his elections for him. The people involved realize that there's a HUGE demand for this. They incorporate. They tailor their software. They then make back door dealings with politicians all over the world promising them how to ensure a win. Then they present to the public about how they're on the up and up with a dog and pony show. They get paid HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS in contracts (fun fact: The Dominion machines? The state doesn't own them. They RENT them.) and they provide support/whatever for them for extra.
This is actually a clever fucking business model. They're a private company so they don't disclose their IP. No one can prove they're rigging it. The states don't own the hardware, so they can't just take one and crack it open without risking litigation. You back door deal with politicians and they keep it quiet because by exposing them, you expose yourself. The dishonesty forces loyalty.
The only real chink in their armor is that they outsource a lot of their IT services and I'm not sure why. I know they can't be in all places at once, but I'd want to see their training documentation for the contracted IT people and what they were contracted specifically to do. It's an all in one solution, so the only reason you'd need IT on the ground is for networking or real basic tech support like, turn it off and on again. Dominion had actual employee's in the key areas though. I'd love to get my hands on internal documentation or even a fucking image of these machines. We don't even need the source code (though that'd be nice since we could see what's commented out and any actual comments from the programmers). We could just decompile the image and reverse engineer.
This stuff isn't as far fetched as you might think it is. They've had years to build it up and perfect it. Years to get connections and deals going. This is actually a well developed con.
Don’t forget the fire fight with the CIA and seal team six to exfil a server with all the proof on it.
FFS... it’s not sexy but invalidating signature mismatches alone would win this election.
Why do you hate justice? Collect the evidence and set the CIA on fire.
That’s 100% false. I am trying to red pill people here and they just keep pointing at the most outrageous and unprovable claims. They are smelling the bullshit there and won’t listen to anything else.
People are drawn to the shiny objects, I can’t get them to focus on the boring provable stuff because they are too busy laughing at the wild, outrageous claims we have absolutely no chance of proving.
Honestly, it’s a strategy the left has employed before, communists have done it throughout history. They did it in Cuba. Create an argument against themselves that is wild and unsubstantiated to distract from the real complaints that have a chance to convince people.
This time we’re doing it to ourselves. We need to stop. I mean many even on our own side are rolling their eyes at the constant tweets of easily disproven claims, and the retweets of clear crackpots who are providing pictures and fake evidence that are immediately discredited, things that are really making us look bad.
“Look at these pictures of shredded ballots I found!!!” and other tweets that are thoroughly disassembled within 10 minutes, but our team has been recycling that shit? It’s embarrassing and needs to stop.
No kidding. I was losing it with that first witness. How many yes or no questions can you take 5 minutes to answer!!! Ahhhh! Still pissed.
Unfortunately, the poor old woman had no idea that this mongoloid was setting up for her full name to be broadcast to millions of people. Her chimp out was fucking gold though.
"DO YOU BELIEVEZ U AN TRUMPZ ARE HONEZT PEOPLEZ?" "RIGHT DISHONESTY!!! - THATS WHAT IM SAYINGGG"
Was anything this retard said even coherent?
Yeah, no excuse for 3hrs. At that point you know it's for show. If they had any interest in the truth, they'd have taken as much time as was needed to hear all the facts. Committee head shows up late, still holds them to the same cutoff time. And the "Yeah, but I don't see how this is going to change the result" is going to start a war. ANY fraud in elections should be punishable by death. That's where I am at this point. I'm done watching the rape of this land. DONE!
Yeah, she had a lot of good info. And she was new to us. With 3 hrs though, there's not a lot of time for lengthy explanation. However, I don't see how else they could've gotten her to testify. She seems very fragile & if Rudy would've pushed her, she could've fallen apart. In the end, it's good we heard her.
Sure did, he is the reason some of our state's reps/senators went, wait whaaaaaaaat?!
Totally agree. His work is solid and damn difficult to hand wave away. It shows a systemic system of fraud.
Wait - he didn’t?
Jesus Christ. Look I swear to God I don’t want to keep criticizing these people but they keep giving us reasons.
MICHIGAN IS OURS
We, the People.
We the Pepes.
You rang?
Heh, heh, heh! Oh, shit!
Always was. It's all fraud. They've been stealing at least 20% of the vote for decades. Democrat stronghold areas are just areas where Democrats have committed soo much election fraud for soo long that no one even questioned it when they stole them.
I know it’s true, but those Senators seemed to scared of Madea/Cynthia Johnson to do anything about it. They’re going to sit around and make our President do all the work as usual to save this country
24.2% of unreturned "requested" absentee ballots were not requested by the registered voter.
23% of unreturned absentee ballots were reported as returned by the voter.
12.6% of absentee ballots sent out despite the registered voter not requesting one.
The fact that this isn't the top post and same lame ass sarcastic uninformative CNN post is on top shows that we really need to refocus on what is important.
If 24% didn't request them, then that is extra 24% of ballots. If 23% did but didn't get returned then that is minus 23%. The difference is only 1% so it's actually a negligible difference in the net votes. Now of course that 24% extra probably all went to Biden, and the 23% lost probably was all for Trump but when you look at the numbers it's only a 1% difference.
They're two different kinds of fraud. They don't just cancel out. One is proof that clearly someone is requesting mass mail in ballots for people who did not request them, and one is people submitting ballots that for some reason aren't getting counted.
I'm not sure why Braynard focused on asking the group of people that were listed requesting but not submitting a ballot about whether they requested a ballot, and not asking the people that actually voted absentee if they requested and submitted a ballot. Because even though fraudulently requesting a ballot is still fraud, if they didn't vote with it it's kind of a moot point.
The intent of this study is to create a credible justification for throwing out ALL mail-in ballots. If you can prove that a large percentage of ballots sent out weren't genuinely requested it brings into question the validity of the mail-in system. How many mail-in ballots were sent out? How many of them were falsely requested? This analysis creates a single simple solution to explain all the irregularities: widespread organized fraud. If you can prove that you can justify throwing out all the mail-in ballots, which is the goal here. This study certainly helps and I hope it will be enough to at least get a forensic audit of the ballots, but without something really solid (like a whistleblower stepping forward that participated in organized fraud) I don't think this study will be enough by itself to overturn Michigan. Sadly. Perhaps more will come later. I certainly think this study is as compelling, if not more, than any of the testimony from today's hearing. It's a shame it wasn't presented.
Give me some MFing voter ID already, JFC.
Let me help you here.. +24 Dem -23 GEOTUS = 47%
we all have different strengths and weaknesses. You friend, should stay as far away from math as possible.
That's exactly how fraud works.
You can't just manufacture 50k ballots without the vote totals looking ridiculous. So you have to send out an extra 25k absentee ballots and lose 25k returned ballots. Then you can say "We got exactly as many ballots as we expected, nothing to look at here"
He's not saying the frauds cancel out their effects, he's saying various frauds cancel out their signs.
People declaring that they haven't requested the ballot doesn't mean much. They might have forgotten, a family member might have done it, etc.
More important argument is voters who claim they returned the ballot and it wasn't counted.
And voters who claim they didn't vote, but the record shows that they voted.
Watch this other video in which Matt addressed these arguments:
https://twitter.com/MattBraynard/status/1331431648320253952
That tard will need the sesame street version.
That tard didn’t listen to a single word that was said at that entire hearing. Every single one of her “questions” was just some race baiting bullshit.
Loved the guy that said he didn’t request one and he thinks the whole thing was rigged
Yea but it's just seems to be them calling random people, asking if they voted in Michigan. They say no, and then they request more info. Do we ever get the follow up of their actual information or confirmation of where/how they voted
I really hope he gets to testify in front of the supreme court. For one, all of this hard work deserves to be recorded in a historic case. He and his team have certainly earned it. I also think he should testify because this is clear evidence of numerous civil rights violations.
I bet $5 SCOTUS would rule 5-4 on this
It’s sad that I’m not joking that I think that 4 would say it’s true
Well that's a lie or ignorance. That provision is flat out untrue. The Constitution is a contract to even be part of the union.
I would've hit harder, to be honest after that. I would've educated him.
Archived (Video, Full)
It takes a special kind of person who is willing to roll down the sleeves and do this level of “grunt work” in such short order.
My hats off to you Matt. Thank you for your amazing patriatism!
username does not check out lol
Matt Braynard, former data chief and strategist for the Trump campaign.
career politician?
who are you talking about?
Trump campaign should have had people like him on standby with every dataset already purchased. Parscale was a fuckup.
Trump needs to have people like him lined up on a 1-2hr video and push it through the EBS so all Americans can see what the fake media is hiding.
I am astonished that this hasn’t happened already. I honestly don’t know what the fuck we’re waiting for. We’re always waiting for something, the entire Republican party, Trump included, always waiting for something. Hell half the people here are still waiting for a plan to punish people who committed crimes in 2015. Still waiting. Patiently waiting.
I wouldn’t open it. If I don’t know the person I don’t open a text link on my phone.
It doesn't matter, the point is to get it out and get it seen.
You saw this video didn't you? Help put it out there to more of the right people. Besides they do have power on the committee, like it or not. I think the bald guy would actually be the one I would target with this as he seemed like he could be fair, not the other two.
I see that it's 24 minutes long. I haven't watched it. There's too much evidence to spend 24 minutes on a video with no QRD. A lot of people here have maybe an hour between work and the chores and kids. In the future, please summarize the thing you're posting in a comment on the thing you posted if you want people who are pressed for time to know what it said. It would help a lot.
You're right in a way. Most of the video is raw phonecall recordings from people who said they did not request a ballot. The big deal for me is the people who disguised PO Boxes as "Apt #" to get ballots.
I'll agree with you if you haven't spent hours engaging and posting bullshit fantastical conspiracy theories.
Somepepe is just a doomer and a concern troll per other posts, ignore.
Got it, so you're being a doomer and on here criticizing about others' ignorance while doing none of the work yourself because "muh job!" "muh kids!" "muh chores!" please won't someone do the thinking for me?!
Media pressure is more important in this case. Have someone parked outside CNN headquarters blasting this at 140dB SPL 24/7.
there's no evidence btw
you forgot the /s
btw is the /s smh
Pointing it out for the others, and me btw
technically it's not a legal hearing, that's why and yeah the time/rules were arbitrary
God bless these people and their work! Wow, it is incredible how deep this fraud goes!
Did he say 13% of all absentee voters didn’t request a ballot ? Holy Shit !! That’s over 300,000 votes! I know he’s trying to be analytical about these results but show us some emotion with a result like that.
Notice how a lot of these people that said they didn't request an absentee ballot are elderly people who probably had no idea how to request an absentee ballot. I'm willing to bet hundreds of thousands of family members all over the country got absentee ballots in their parents' names and voted for them. Absolutely sick.
Wait, why didn't he testify???
Did we burn all of our time on the witnesses that we had last night?
Mainly a new one who pretty much drove the entire board (TD) crazy. It was incredibly frustrating.
What happened?
They scheduled 3hrs only. Committee Chair shows up late & says he's still keeping the scheduled cutoff time. New witness speaks first & is very scared & nervous. Provides good info, but very disorganized & lengthy testimony with innumerable pauses & reiterations, jumping around her timeline in a confusing way, to where even Rudy got lost at one point. Mayor would ask her a yes or no question, she'd take minutes to get to the point. Almost every single impactful question by Rudy received a response that deflated the impact.
e.g. MAYOR: "You said when you turned people away for not having the proper signature that they'd go & vote at another table. Is that correct?" WITNESS: "Well, you see, when you're going through the process....[ages pass]. I did not actually see them vote at another table. They left, but they could have gone to another precinct."
It was like she had told things a bit differently to Mayor the night before. She had some good info & it was good to hear her testimony. Terrible in person witness though, IMO.
yes
this is irrefutable. I'm not a lawyer but I know how to put together an ikea table in under 5 hours so fuck me sideways if that is not irrefutable.
Could a pede archive this? I'm not at a desktop right now.
Can I ask...why is it so hard to find a list of email addresses to reach legislature? Is there like a...legislature connection database? Like CRM for public to reach politicians.
You can use this link to email every Michigan rep (+other contested states). https://everylegalvote.com/home
I appreciate it
It would be awesome if Trump, Don Jr. or Bongino saw this and tweeted it out. Just saying!
I REALLY wanted to hear Matt testify in that hearing and field questions from the representatives. I hope they call him in for a subsequent hearing.
This is all Russian disinformation. All these people are Russian actors. - New York Times
This is insane and systematic. I will never believe Biden is a legit President.
So in Michigan - about 3.4 Mail in Ballots were SENT OUT BY THE STATE -
but apparently about 12.6% of those voters DID NOT ACTUALLY REQUEST A MAIL IN BALLOT....
That is about 423,000 Ballots that were 'mysteriously sent out' by the State - and on the request form you can actually ALTER THE ADDRESS that the ballot goes to......
THAT SHOULD NEVER HAPPEN.... There should be NO VOTER who gets a Mail in Ballot without requesting it themselves.
Strongly suggest blasting this clip at your favorite MSM douchers and networks...especially those who claim there is no evidence...like Bret Baier.
Matt Braynard as the most compelling evidence and it would over turn all swing state results.
Why wasnt he up first for real
I loved the guy that was like “I did not (request a ballot) ... I think the whole thing was rigged!” Absolute legend
Thanks for posting this. Hearing the calls was powerful.
When can they present to the scotus? They're the only ones at this point that can do anything
Why wasn't he able to testify in person? Was he not allowed?
Wish he could have testified, he would have been better than some who did.
This needs a STICKY
Wait so they let the Indian lady go for 30 minutes but Matt couldn't at all? The first witness should have been coached better or given less time. It was hard to follow and hardly definitive analysis like Matt has.
God bless her, BTW. Just saying a better witness could have been chosen for first up to really get people's attention.
Why didn’t they let him testify??
Tried to open it but seems like twitter already deleted.
Anyone has a mirror?
It's still up for me
Every address those ballots were sent to need to be investigated, and the people associated with them locked up. There have to be consequences.
Well, according to ABC news all of this is unfounded and there's no proof of any voter fraud. This is 100% what they said this morning I shit you not. We need to keep this fight up and Trump WILL be reelected despite the fraud and lies.
I guess the morons who only watch the MSM will be in for quite the shock when Trump is sworn in again next month.