Yep, the team was going to the courts to get their hands on them and then the election supervisors offered them these 2500. It is fucking ridiculous, in a fair election both sides are supposed to be able to see as many of them as they want. The ballots aren't a fucking secret, this is supposed to be an open election.
They should have been given a timetable, not a set number of ballots. i.e "you can look at as many random ballots as you want as long as you're finished by Tuesday at noon." That would be a better sample audit.
this is a much better sample size but we really need 20k to be statistically significant.
What Im concerned about is who is selecting the sample ballots and how they are deciding on the sample.
GOP needs to be fully involved n that on a microscopic level, because because this is the whole ball game in AZ and Dems will do anything and everything to grab a sample that shows everything was fine.
Exactly, sample size needs to be a significant amount to ensure that the chances of pre selecting ballots isn't possible and they need to be watched by both parties.
Come on fraud! Need them to find at least 100 or more. I don't like this small batch stuff though. They need to do 250K at a minimum. 2500 is stupid and we don't have time to keep looking at tiny batches.
So what they found before with the first 100 ballots was that the person(s) who hand duplicated 2 of them actually switched the vote from Trump to Biden, right?
Mail-in ballots in AZ had some duplications as well, not just from election day. Thankfully their hand-picked small ass sample of 100 picked up some fraud or as the Democrats call them "clerical errors".
Better make sure it is a true sample and not a preselected sample thats already been looked at!!
well the first batch led onto this, it would have been easier to preselect 100 ballots than 2500, so I'm hopeful.
Honestly that sample size was a JOKE!
And they still found fraud it in! Just shows how rampant the cheating was
Yep, the team was going to the courts to get their hands on them and then the election supervisors offered them these 2500. It is fucking ridiculous, in a fair election both sides are supposed to be able to see as many of them as they want. The ballots aren't a fucking secret, this is supposed to be an open election.
I am deeply suspicious of a set of ballots pre-selected by crooked election supervisors.
They should have been given a timetable, not a set number of ballots. i.e "you can look at as many random ballots as you want as long as you're finished by Tuesday at noon." That would be a better sample audit.
this is a much better sample size but we really need 20k to be statistically significant.
What Im concerned about is who is selecting the sample ballots and how they are deciding on the sample.
GOP needs to be fully involved n that on a microscopic level, because because this is the whole ball game in AZ and Dems will do anything and everything to grab a sample that shows everything was fine.
Pretty sure there are only 20K or so duplicate ballots (which is what these are), many many more absentee.
20K dupes isn't a lot to look at. Hello, do 30 random samples of 100 from the 20K and see what the fraud rate is.
The race is so close they would need ~314,000 ballots to have 95% confidence of a 0.05% discrepancy.
https://clincalc.com/stats/samplesize.aspx
I would think the chose the first 100 (pre screened) ballots to put the question to rest but that failed the dems.
If those ballots were the pick of the litter, imagine what they would find in random samples.
Exactly, sample size needs to be a significant amount to ensure that the chances of pre selecting ballots isn't possible and they need to be watched by both parties.
Watch it be a 15% error rate
Come on fraud! Need them to find at least 100 or more. I don't like this small batch stuff though. They need to do 250K at a minimum. 2500 is stupid and we don't have time to keep looking at tiny batches.
Only if the sample is truly random. Hopefully it is....
The demo-rats wanted to do this behind closed doors, without anybody watching.
The judge looked at them like "WTF? No".
If its the same based judge, hopefully he has the foresight to ensure the selection is random.
Wow that's really generous of the aristocracy to grace us this most generous boon.
Thank you, sir! May I have another?
What is a duplicate ballot?
So what they found before with the first 100 ballots was that the person(s) who hand duplicated 2 of them actually switched the vote from Trump to Biden, right?
One was switched. Another they just left Trump off.
2/100 ballots. But a 3% swing.
isoLaTed inCiDeNtS no WidEspReAd fRaUd
Why not just do a hand count of those?
I would be curious as to how many of these duplicates were due to the sharpies
Why don’t they get all of the fucking duplicates? Fuck this piecemeal shit.
Who selected the ballots?
The real question is: do they verify that the votes are from legal citizens that reside in AZ?
any idea of a time the results will be released?
Who gets to pick the sample?
They would have been shredded by now in MI or GA.
Who is selecting these ballots? How are they being selected?
Mail-in ballots in AZ had some duplications as well, not just from election day. Thankfully their hand-picked small ass sample of 100 picked up some fraud or as the Democrats call them "clerical errors".
Watch this batch be from election night and not after.