How has she not changed her ideology and political philosophy based on her experiences with her own party? I know a lot of Republicans like Tulsi, but I'm skeptical about her purely based on the fact that she's still a Democrat. Anyone with morals and standards couldn't remain a member of that party.
he's an admitted liberal, here to grace us with his benevolent presence, telling us not to vote in GA and supports a bitch who couldn't vote against those articles of impeachment because she's sure trump is guilty of something.
Would that be federal roads and bridges, or state, or county? Do you even know the difference? Is Trump the one not getting it done, or is it the Congress? Who controls the money?
Have YOU done anything? Take pictures and email to legislators in your local and state govs, and copy the local news on 'em. Watch things get done. This is YOUR country, Trump can't do EVERYTHING for you.
She's just going with the flow.
The same Tulsi gabbard that's on the same "youth leadership" something something as Dan Crenshaw and Alexander Soros?
oh yeah, one and the same.
it might be . 230 protects the small guys as well as the big ones. if that's repealed then big tech can sue anyone and everyone into the ground. Imagine a samsung vs apple lawsuit , except its facebook, google and twitter against everyone else.
Let's hope i just understood it wrong.
The best way to fix this is to clarify that the 1A applies to online speech on major platforms (Major platform defined as any with one million+ users. Gaming companies exempted because of kids playing.)
These are private companies and have the right to regulate what is said and not said on THEIR platforms. 1A and the rest of the Bill of Rights regulate the GOVERNMENT NOT PRIVATE CORPS, BUSINESSES OR PEOPLE. STOP using 1A argument to regulate private property, this is contradictory to what we believe in.
This is not to saying what Big Tech is doing is right or wrong, and a solution to fight their behavior and power needs to be found. Preferably a market solution will arise.
A market solution will not arise. I can 100% guarantee that. All there will be, is niche alternatives like here and Parler, filled with people who were banned by big tech. AWS etc type infrastructure is required to create the likes of a Facebook or Twitter and that isn't cheap.
If 1A doesn't apply online, it doesn't apply. The majority of discourse is over the internet now. We can argue over who should be included at a later date.
1A does apply online, but it only regulates the government as the Constitution intended.
You do understand, that you are either taking rights away from private entities, or saying that 1A regulates private entities and therefor you, me, this forum, on and offline (equal protection under the law). This is a very dangerous idea, leveraging the Bill of RIghts to deprive rights.
To be fair she is the most transparent controlled opposition and doesn't seem to be too afraid to buck the Democrats. Shit, she went after Hilldog. I'll take her over the RINO fucks.
Was unaware of the Klaus Schwab connection. I'll get my pitchfork back out.
Unfortunately If you're a politician you're going to have to be a weasel piece of shit. That's the system. But I'd agree. She's salvageable and I'd even take her over the RINOs.
Guys 230 needs to be amended. Section 230 protects this site. If we lose it all together this site will become liable for anything a shill says on it and will get shut down.
Repealing 230 should be done carefully. Else sites like TD win will be sued to death and independent media as a whole. The power will go back to traditional media. All comment sections will be closed across the board.
It would be better to go after twitter and the big sites for violations.
Quasi based hawaiian knows how bad the dem propaganda machine is fighting it first hand. I respect her, even if I don't agree with almost 0% of her domestic policy ideas.
As a mass attending papist dove pede (American Solidarity Party member), I hope the next time the Democrats win the presidency, she is the secretary of state and not some monied warmonger. Her and Yang actually seemed to care about the country and our working class men and women who don't live in the 5 biggest media markets. Fuck the military though.
If 230 is repealed, something better needs to replace it because small sites like this will get sued out of existence.
Big tech says they don't want 230 to go away, but here in a couple years after they share their machine learning algorithms amongst themselves to silence or manipulate user created content, they will declare themselves publishers and be rather immune from lawsuits. This all with the benefit of smaller sites being strangulated by lawsuits or simply moving to a more friendly country.
A sort of bill of rights that protects users from being silenced on platforms if their content is not illegal or spam would be the way to go.
Tulsi continues to surprise me with the way she stands against the tide of her party. It would be good to see more levelheadedness in our politics, unfortunately their voters won't really care much for it. So she will always be a liability both to the Democrats and the Republicans she reaches across the aisle for.
Wow, in the comments people are thinking this will end free speech! These morons think about everything the wrong way around.
But gotta hand it to Tulsi - she seems to be one of the very few non-Globalist puppet Democrat. Bet anything she will switch to Trump party when it comes.
If you think the gaslighting is amazing looking from the outside, you aint seen anything looking from inside. The way they gaslight their employees is criminal. In normal times, normal people dont cry hysterically because the person their boss said was n evil person became President. And its been down hill since then.
She's a Democrat on purpose. Never forget how much they lie. She will drip honey in your ears, while she distracts you with her tits, and plunge the knife in your back the second you let your guard down. She is setting herself up for a run in '24. She see's how much the simps drool and that makes her think she can pull it off.
Tulsi msu be thinking how biden won nomination by cheating on dominion machines
How has she not changed her ideology and political philosophy based on her experiences with her own party? I know a lot of Republicans like Tulsi, but I'm skeptical about her purely based on the fact that she's still a Democrat. Anyone with morals and standards couldn't remain a member of that party.
Trump was a Democrat too. Now it's Trump. I support Trump no GOP or dem. They fight for the swamp. Trump fight for the people
Naw she went tds with all the others. She lost me when I saw her towing that line.
She's a failsafe for them. She's a backdoor back in if this ultra leftism fails.
Do not trust her! Even if she says the best things imaginable, she is not on our side!
She supports Medicare for all, climate hoaxing, fake race nonsense, AWB, etc. She is a fraud!
Why? We know the letter next to your name means nothing.
Biden won because he was next in line. The DNC couldn't give a fuck about real voting in my opinion.
he's an admitted liberal, here to grace us with his benevolent presence, telling us not to vote in GA and supports a bitch who couldn't vote against those articles of impeachment because she's sure trump is guilty of something.
fucking banned.
Would that be federal roads and bridges, or state, or county? Do you even know the difference? Is Trump the one not getting it done, or is it the Congress? Who controls the money?
Have YOU done anything? Take pictures and email to legislators in your local and state govs, and copy the local news on 'em. Watch things get done. This is YOUR country, Trump can't do EVERYTHING for you.
She's just going with the flow. The same Tulsi gabbard that's on the same "youth leadership" something something as Dan Crenshaw and Alexander Soros? oh yeah, one and the same.
Maybe the new account saying repealing 230 helps big tech is right.
it might be . 230 protects the small guys as well as the big ones. if that's repealed then big tech can sue anyone and everyone into the ground. Imagine a samsung vs apple lawsuit , except its facebook, google and twitter against everyone else. Let's hope i just understood it wrong.
The best way to fix this is to clarify that the 1A applies to online speech on major platforms (Major platform defined as any with one million+ users. Gaming companies exempted because of kids playing.)
These are private companies and have the right to regulate what is said and not said on THEIR platforms. 1A and the rest of the Bill of Rights regulate the GOVERNMENT NOT PRIVATE CORPS, BUSINESSES OR PEOPLE. STOP using 1A argument to regulate private property, this is contradictory to what we believe in. This is not to saying what Big Tech is doing is right or wrong, and a solution to fight their behavior and power needs to be found. Preferably a market solution will arise.
A market solution will not arise. I can 100% guarantee that. All there will be, is niche alternatives like here and Parler, filled with people who were banned by big tech. AWS etc type infrastructure is required to create the likes of a Facebook or Twitter and that isn't cheap.
If 1A doesn't apply online, it doesn't apply. The majority of discourse is over the internet now. We can argue over who should be included at a later date.
1A does apply online, but it only regulates the government as the Constitution intended. You do understand, that you are either taking rights away from private entities, or saying that 1A regulates private entities and therefor you, me, this forum, on and offline (equal protection under the law). This is a very dangerous idea, leveraging the Bill of RIghts to deprive rights.
She's controlled opposition and a sleeper agent.
To be fair she is the most transparent controlled opposition and doesn't seem to be too afraid to buck the Democrats. Shit, she went after Hilldog. I'll take her over the RINO fucks.
Was unaware of the Klaus Schwab connection. I'll get my pitchfork back out.
Like Bernie she knows that and they do...nothing about it but collect money from honest hardworking people.
Many of the names are shocking to all of us. Well...Marcon isn't a shock as he explicitly states he is a globalist.
He's right. She's on Klaus Schwab's organization's board with the likes of Zuckerberg.
Always knew Tulsi was one of the better ones, though I think 230 should be modified, not removed.
That's like saying "She counted all the way to 'potato' and didn't drool once!".
That's a very fucking low bar to clear if you have a D next to your name
Hey man, even the Special Olympics has its winners
I'm very wary about Tulsi
Controlled opposition
Klaus Schwab's cockholster speaks up again.
:O
Tulsi's a commie Democrat, but it seems she may be salvageable.
Unfortunately If you're a politician you're going to have to be a weasel piece of shit. That's the system. But I'd agree. She's salvageable and I'd even take her over the RINOs.
Guys 230 needs to be amended. Section 230 protects this site. If we lose it all together this site will become liable for anything a shill says on it and will get shut down.
Im fine with that im just saying don't repeal it with out a plan
Repealing 230 should be done carefully. Else sites like TD win will be sued to death and independent media as a whole. The power will go back to traditional media. All comment sections will be closed across the board.
It would be better to go after twitter and the big sites for violations.
Quasi based hawaiian knows how bad the dem propaganda machine is fighting it first hand. I respect her, even if I don't agree with almost 0% of her domestic policy ideas.
She's a Dem... but as far as Dem's go TODAY, it's about as good as it gets.
It takes balls to tweet something like that out.
As a mass attending papist dove pede (American Solidarity Party member), I hope the next time the Democrats win the presidency, she is the secretary of state and not some monied warmonger. Her and Yang actually seemed to care about the country and our working class men and women who don't live in the 5 biggest media markets. Fuck the military though.
If 230 is repealed, something better needs to replace it because small sites like this will get sued out of existence.
Big tech says they don't want 230 to go away, but here in a couple years after they share their machine learning algorithms amongst themselves to silence or manipulate user created content, they will declare themselves publishers and be rather immune from lawsuits. This all with the benefit of smaller sites being strangulated by lawsuits or simply moving to a more friendly country.
A sort of bill of rights that protects users from being silenced on platforms if their content is not illegal or spam would be the way to go.
Tulsi continues to surprise me with the way she stands against the tide of her party. It would be good to see more levelheadedness in our politics, unfortunately their voters won't really care much for it. So she will always be a liability both to the Democrats and the Republicans she reaches across the aisle for.
I disagree with ms Gabbard on many issues but agree on some. However she is not crazy and that sets her apart.
Wow, in the comments people are thinking this will end free speech! These morons think about everything the wrong way around.
But gotta hand it to Tulsi - she seems to be one of the very few non-Globalist puppet Democrat. Bet anything she will switch to Trump party when it comes.
Kind of amazing to see the level of gaslighting by big tech, right?
If you think the gaslighting is amazing looking from the outside, you aint seen anything looking from inside. The way they gaslight their employees is criminal. In normal times, normal people dont cry hysterically because the person their boss said was n evil person became President. And its been down hill since then.
Oh well, that was a short lived illusion.
She's a Democrat on purpose. Never forget how much they lie. She will drip honey in your ears, while she distracts you with her tits, and plunge the knife in your back the second you let your guard down. She is setting herself up for a run in '24. She see's how much the simps drool and that makes her think she can pull it off.
At least she has ethics... for a democrat.
230 needs to be reformed in how it applies to social media companies. To outright remove it would be the end of independent content on the internet