659
Comments (18)
sorted by:
15
lilpal 15 points ago +15 / -0

Smartmatic = successfull election? How do you have a “successful” election? you have an outcome, it’s only “successful” if you are manipulating it.

10
BorisWave 10 points ago +10 / -0

Successful, as in the outcome that they want.

Unbelievable how brazen they are!

2
samson1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

What an odd way of framing that - I thought the same thing about the word successful.

0
BidensDog 0 points ago +1 / -1

What are the other two "successful" companies?

5
Lexaprohater 5 points ago +5 / -0

LOOK UP THE 2010 HAITIAN PRESIDENT. SUPPORTED BY CLINTON.

4
AllyInAsia 4 points ago +4 / -0

Answer: Definitely.

3
KingMob 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every election with a computer connected is suspect. The 2000 election with the hanging chads was used to as an excuse to remove punch cards, which where very effective at recording complex ballots with mechanical tabulators. Those devices had been in use since the 1920s, and we're noted for being generally error free, quick and secure. The had to change the vote of a device with gears. Plus they generally required in person voting.

2
MrCripple 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, crazy

2
ChickNorris 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looks like they may have also used it in Haiti. Haiti has always been a country of peculiar interest to the Clintons.

2
JebBushEnergy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will send you an article on this. I will send you their record. I will send you some info on them.

Hey Bob - how about you draft better worded emails to start, fuckface.

2
DanIsSwell 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

“Successful” we know how these crooks achieve success. Haiti was one of the places they wanted a crook in charge of, so they can keep stealing kids. Can’t have another Laura Silsby situation. This email was sent only THREE months after the Silsby fiasco.

2
edna-unger 2 points ago +3 / -1

clinton was not president in 2010, seems odd

4
Fadedglory 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State from 2009-2013 though.

4
BorisWave 4 points ago +4 / -0

Technically former Presidents, are still referred to by the title of President, which is what I assume is happening in this email.

1
Ameronaut 1 point ago +1 / -0

This must be from the timeline where Hillary beat Obama in the 2008 primaries

1
LibertyisYuge 1 point ago +1 / -0

Global Options Group looks interesting.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3