Jessy was what an expert witness looks like. She knows her job description and the legally binding state manual back to front. But I hate for her to have to go through that again.
The first witness devastated any notion that a proper, fair or legal election was held in Michigan. Her testimony laid bare that 10s of thousands (and probably 100s of thousands) of votes were invalid due to election supervisors encouraging irregular and fraudulent behavior.
The remainder of the night demonstrated concerted and widespread intimidation and discrimination, organized fraud and incompetence, and that doesn't even include the system manipulations that the Colonel attested to happening.
The real disaster is the slippery Republican representatives who were clearly looking for "outs" that would let the elude responsibility.
Your last point is the most important that's why you need to hit them the rock hard facts, all of the emotional stuff they can find excuses to dance around.
Agreed. I get weary of some of these witnesses who cannot communicate their way out of a wet paper sack. I know some probably adored that blond woman who was really feisty, but she needs to learn how to present her case much more succinctly and check her partisanship at the door.
Then alter my statement. Check her unhinged partisanship at the door.
Cynthia Johnson was being a partisan asshole. Do you want OUR side to do the same thing?
Of course not. WE need to BE partisan, but do so in a cogent and well-directed manner that hammers home the solidity of our CASE and the fundamental STRENGTH of our arguments.
Everything else can be checked at the freaking front door.
By being clearly partisan, the other side immediately shuts their eyes and ears the same way you and I did when Cynthia Johnson opened her pie hole.
Also to explain how hard a fraud like this would be to pull off.
Scanning the same run of ballots multiple times or incorrectly attributing trump ballots to biden, would cause a huge discrepancy at the end of the night or at recount. It would be easily caught, which is why its never done.
It would take a large amount of fake ballots brought in to match the amount scanned
A. Multiple affiants that large numbers of ballots were brought in at night in secret, and in unofficial containers like garbage bags
There would need to be no non-criminal witnesses to the replacing and stuffing of ballots
B. Multiple affiants show republican poll watchers were intimidated and excluded from observing the process.
There would be more votes than voters, so nonvoters would need to be recorded as voting. A massive effort that would leave obvious evidence. A large amount of people who didnt vote recorded as voting would be hard to hide.
C. Matt Braynard showed that there is a large amount of voters who never requested a ballot or voted recorded as voting. Switching nonvoters to voters on the electronic record would be much more plausible if the computers were connected to the internet, allowing a group outside the tcf center to handle that massive workload.
D. Multiple affiants say machines were connected to internet
E. 71% of precincts are not in balance. But that is good for them, they can just make sure all the boxes are off by 1 or 2 votes, so it looks minor but hides all of the fraudulent ballots.
Most americans would never do something this heinous
F. Democrats believe that Republicans are evil, so anything to stop them becomes justifiable. “By Any Means Necessary” is literally the name of one of their groups.
Why are there no/not many witnesses?
G. Lots of witnesses, and a culture of intimidation and attacks by left wing extremists prevents people from talking. Old democrat tactic, they would burn a cross in your yard.
It would be easily caught, which is why its never done.
That would be true if the Election Office actually provided the Executive Written report with the precinct breakdown of the imbalances. But they did not. It was caught by the officials nearest to the problem -- but allowed and ignored, then that information not passed along. So your argument here doesn't hold any water.
There would be more votes than voters, so nonvoters would need to be recorded as voting. A massive effort that would leave obvious evidence. A large amount of people who didnt vote recorded as voting would be hard to hide.
No, none of this is "hard to hide"; we have testimony already that the election officials have hidden information, delayed providing it (which allows for "fixing" these issues in the interim), and otherwise avoided all opportunities for transparency. Everything you're saying is contradicted by the actual facts presented in testimony because it relies on the election officials divulging problems, when we know that they specifically have covered them up and offer no explanation for the problems OR their cover up.
Im literally refuting all of those points in the post. Im putting the bullet points of why it should be hard/impossible to happen and then the evidence that it did happen.
In a real, secure election it would be damn near impossible to pull a heist like this off.
In this election in democrat controlled cities literally every safeguard to prevent this scenario was broken
I'm not saying no human element but you need to show these law makers concrete evidence that over 140k ballots are invalid. These emotional stories should be supporting the concrete evidence that gives them the backbone they need to stand up.
The Colonel had his best night last night. Although he seemed quiet, I took it as reserved, patient, and armed with confidence.
He knew the details since it was his 3rd or 4th presentation, and he knew the angles that the committee members were taking. That guy was money.
I love that rep johnson was trying to tell him how the machine works. Bro - STFU and listen to daddy.
she is not smart she has the iq lower than a rock
BASED COLONEL!!!!
The based indian girl and hispanic? Dude were good.
I think just letting the world see the democrats display their character, reciting debunked lies (Rudy asking for a pardon, 39 lawsuits)
"Mr. Giuliani, hi again, do you think that both you and the President are honest men?"
Also include Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai. He was fantastic in AZ.
His recorded "testimony" from last night would have been perfect
Jessy was what an expert witness looks like. She knows her job description and the legally binding state manual back to front. But I hate for her to have to go through that again.
It was not even close to a disaster.
The first witness devastated any notion that a proper, fair or legal election was held in Michigan. Her testimony laid bare that 10s of thousands (and probably 100s of thousands) of votes were invalid due to election supervisors encouraging irregular and fraudulent behavior.
The remainder of the night demonstrated concerted and widespread intimidation and discrimination, organized fraud and incompetence, and that doesn't even include the system manipulations that the Colonel attested to happening.
The real disaster is the slippery Republican representatives who were clearly looking for "outs" that would let the elude responsibility.
Your last point is the most important that's why you need to hit them the rock hard facts, all of the emotional stuff they can find excuses to dance around.
Melisa Carano is good for getting eyes on the trial. Not afraid to call people out and a lot of fun to look at.
Agreed. I get weary of some of these witnesses who cannot communicate their way out of a wet paper sack. I know some probably adored that blond woman who was really feisty, but she needs to learn how to present her case much more succinctly and check her partisanship at the door.
Democrats do not do this. Democrats know how to win. We still don’t.
Then alter my statement. Check her unhinged partisanship at the door.
Cynthia Johnson was being a partisan asshole. Do you want OUR side to do the same thing?
Of course not. WE need to BE partisan, but do so in a cogent and well-directed manner that hammers home the solidity of our CASE and the fundamental STRENGTH of our arguments.
Everything else can be checked at the freaking front door.
By being clearly partisan, the other side immediately shuts their eyes and ears the same way you and I did when Cynthia Johnson opened her pie hole.
We don't need that.
Also to explain how hard a fraud like this would be to pull off.
Scanning the same run of ballots multiple times or incorrectly attributing trump ballots to biden, would cause a huge discrepancy at the end of the night or at recount. It would be easily caught, which is why its never done.
A. Multiple affiants that large numbers of ballots were brought in at night in secret, and in unofficial containers like garbage bags
B. Multiple affiants show republican poll watchers were intimidated and excluded from observing the process.
C. Matt Braynard showed that there is a large amount of voters who never requested a ballot or voted recorded as voting. Switching nonvoters to voters on the electronic record would be much more plausible if the computers were connected to the internet, allowing a group outside the tcf center to handle that massive workload.
D. Multiple affiants say machines were connected to internet
E. 71% of precincts are not in balance. But that is good for them, they can just make sure all the boxes are off by 1 or 2 votes, so it looks minor but hides all of the fraudulent ballots.
F. Democrats believe that Republicans are evil, so anything to stop them becomes justifiable. “By Any Means Necessary” is literally the name of one of their groups.
G. Lots of witnesses, and a culture of intimidation and attacks by left wing extremists prevents people from talking. Old democrat tactic, they would burn a cross in your yard.
That would be true if the Election Office actually provided the Executive Written report with the precinct breakdown of the imbalances. But they did not. It was caught by the officials nearest to the problem -- but allowed and ignored, then that information not passed along. So your argument here doesn't hold any water.
No, none of this is "hard to hide"; we have testimony already that the election officials have hidden information, delayed providing it (which allows for "fixing" these issues in the interim), and otherwise avoided all opportunities for transparency. Everything you're saying is contradicted by the actual facts presented in testimony because it relies on the election officials divulging problems, when we know that they specifically have covered them up and offer no explanation for the problems OR their cover up.
Im literally refuting all of those points in the post. Im putting the bullet points of why it should be hard/impossible to happen and then the evidence that it did happen.
In a real, secure election it would be damn near impossible to pull a heist like this off.
In this election in democrat controlled cities literally every safeguard to prevent this scenario was broken
Definitely.
"Ms. Doe said that....blag blah blah."
Well let me read this signed affidavit from Ms. Doe, way the exact oppisite.
X.x
I'm not saying no human element but you need to show these law makers concrete evidence that over 140k ballots are invalid. These emotional stories should be supporting the concrete evidence that gives them the backbone they need to stand up.
Yeah the duo of Jessie and blonde hottie, was brutal on the ears. They have to move a few ppl around