8192
Comments (496)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
16
MLGS 16 points ago +17 / -1

You mean we might have to post under absurd rules that large companies don't have to follow and carefully watch every word we say while their sites host thousands of people cackling about cutting our throats open in the street?

6
r_u_srs_srsly 6 points ago +8 / -2

if we assume the rules will be applied fairly (I know, but follow me)

we already know twitter/facebook have tooling that can completely shadowban anyone at a moments notice, so they can do it.

Remove section 230 social media dies and what is left are the "politically correct" influencers pandering to whoever signs their checks.

4
Aries_cz 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, meaning that lefties could swarm here, post child porn and get the site and the owners into serious legal troubles.