8192
Comments (496)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
jamrs 3 points ago +4 / -1

Because they, as a publisher, will deem what content that want on their platform.

What are you not understanding

1
Eroticaenthusiast 1 point ago +4 / -3

Well, they are already doing that, 230 is already functionally useless for preserving free speech.

2
jamrs 2 points ago +5 / -3

So why do you think that getting rid of it is going to make anything better for us? It won't. It basically just kills social media, which is fine I guess. I'd much rather have an online freedom of speech guaranteed by law but that probably won't happen

1
GetWokeGetBroke 1 point ago +4 / -3

We will then be able to sue them when their demonrat users post shit they shouldn't have.