yep. Obviously, removing section 230 is not ideal.
But the threat and abuse of power happening right now from Big Tech outright censoring POTUS, controlling which is fact-checked news, etc, is so much bigger problem than killing small content creators/websites.
And small content creators and websites will not just die instantly, theyll find a way to survive even for medium term. It is not like Trump is saying there should be no immunity 230 permanently.
Perfect is the enemy of the good. There will be no perfect 230 solution in the near term, not without full control of Senate/ House and Presidency.
Same thing when Trump confronted China on trade deals, there are drawbacks. And RINOs whined about this is not the right approach blah blah. No pain, no gain.
I agree. Someone earlier basically said that laissez-faire capitalisms would solve the issue. They really do not see that these commy, hormone blocker, skirt wearing, cocksuckers will do anything to destroy us, turning our norms against us it not outside of their doctrine.
yep. Obviously, removing section 230 is not ideal.
But the threat and abuse of power happening right now from Big Tech outright censoring POTUS, controlling which is fact-checked news, etc, is so much bigger problem than killing small content creators/websites.
And small content creators and websites will not just die instantly, theyll find a way to survive even for medium term. It is not like Trump is saying there should be no immunity 230 permanently.
Perfect is the enemy of the good. There will be no perfect 230 solution in the near term, not without full control of Senate/ House and Presidency.
Same thing when Trump confronted China on trade deals, there are drawbacks. And RINOs whined about this is not the right approach blah blah. No pain, no gain.
I agree. Someone earlier basically said that laissez-faire capitalisms would solve the issue. They really do not see that these commy, hormone blocker, skirt wearing, cocksuckers will do anything to destroy us, turning our norms against us it not outside of their doctrine.