Not technically. Technically 5-4 ruling holds. But think about it. If its not close to unanimous, the next 4 years are going to be just more division and partisan. Honestly the Scotus has a responsibility to give an unanimous vote and save a lot of trouble for a lot of people.
SCOTUS knows this, and I feel that unless there is near unanimous consent, they might be unwilling to take the case. But lets see, there is no way they can get away from this. One way or another.
A 5-4 ruling is what is required to "take the case" idiot. A 5-4 ruling is also enough to REVERSE, you dumbshit. Who gives a shit what the crooked Liberal judges say.
5 - 4 is bad news. It really needs to be at least 7 - 2, lets see.
Did not know that. Is this accurate?
Not technically. Technically 5-4 ruling holds. But think about it. If its not close to unanimous, the next 4 years are going to be just more division and partisan. Honestly the Scotus has a responsibility to give an unanimous vote and save a lot of trouble for a lot of people.
SCOTUS knows this, and I feel that unless there is near unanimous consent, they might be unwilling to take the case. But lets see, there is no way they can get away from this. One way or another.
A 5-4 ruling is what is required to "take the case" idiot. A 5-4 ruling is also enough to REVERSE, you dumbshit. Who gives a shit what the crooked Liberal judges say.
WTF? They are DEMS, not gonna happen.