3720
Comments (189)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
146
rjdf 146 points ago +146 / -0

We were actually told this by multiple sources in 2016. People just believed the MSM too much and dismissed it.

50
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 50 points ago +51 / -1

OP's headline is wrong. This is about the DCCC leaks (NOT THE PODESTA LEAKS). Which we all knew were released by insiders on purpose to deflect and distract, as well as adding fake 'russian finger prints'.

10
rjdf 10 points ago +11 / -1

OP never said Podesta nor DNC. What was wrong here? The DNC emails were also insiders. They both were and we knew it all along.

8
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 8 points ago +9 / -1

He said "HILLARY" which is commonly confused for the Podesta leaks since he was her campaign manager.

4
rjdf 4 points ago +5 / -1

We all know it pertained to and included dirt on Hillary. That's like saying, "There's no such thing as Obamacare", when we all know it means ACA

4
EndHumanTrafficking2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, this is an important clarification. More people need to understand the difference.

My normie friends have occasionally referred to 'Hillary's emails' when they mean either:

  • The DNC emails that were leaked by a DNC insider, or;
  • The Podesta emails that were phished, or;
  • The DCCC emails that were purposely leaked by insiders with fake 'Russian fingerprints' to use as their cover story (actually proven to be Ukrainian malware, so they couldn't even get their fake cover story right).
2
sigint1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hillary's emails should mean the clintonmail.com emails from her personal server that was also used for state department communications with her and her staff. But to your point, normies can't distinguish any of these. I can not recall if any/many of those were leaked, though I think some may have been released under FOIA.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
You_Aint_Black 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can I get a source with proof on the Russian fingerprints being fake? Need to destroy the narrative with some normies I know.

1
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 1 point ago +1 / -0

http://g-2.space/

All the docs from 'guccifer 2.0' was disinformation purposefully leaked by the DNC to make the other leaks look like they were of russian origin.

2
idshukhov 2 points ago +2 / -0

Were the later leaks attributed to Guccifer 2? I recall those were thought to be fake and done by the Hillary team at the time. Apparently, the FBI is the Hillary team.

3
rjdf 3 points ago +3 / -0

There were two leaks that year:

The DNC leak, which they claimed was Guccifer 2.0 (a supposed Russian)

The Podesta leak, which they claimed was a Russian spear-phishing hack.

Both were related to Hillary.