OP's headline is wrong. This is about the DCCC leaks (NOT THE PODESTA LEAKS). Which we all knew were released by insiders on purpose to deflect and distract, as well as adding fake 'russian finger prints'.
Yes, this is an important clarification. More people need to understand the difference.
My normie friends have occasionally referred to 'Hillary's emails' when they mean either:
The DNC emails that were leaked by a DNC insider, or;
The Podesta emails that were phished, or;
The DCCC emails that were purposely leaked by insiders with fake 'Russian fingerprints' to use as their cover story (actually proven to be Ukrainian malware, so they couldn't even get their fake cover story right).
Hillary's emails should mean the clintonmail.com emails from her personal server that was also used for state department communications with her and her staff. But to your point, normies can't distinguish any of these. I can not recall if any/many of those were leaked, though I think some may have been released under FOIA.
OP's headline is wrong. This is about the DCCC leaks (NOT THE PODESTA LEAKS). Which we all knew were released by insiders on purpose to deflect and distract, as well as adding fake 'russian finger prints'.
OP never said Podesta nor DNC. What was wrong here? The DNC emails were also insiders. They both were and we knew it all along.
He said "HILLARY" which is commonly confused for the Podesta leaks since he was her campaign manager.
We all know it pertained to and included dirt on Hillary. That's like saying, "There's no such thing as Obamacare", when we all know it means ACA
Exactly. WHICH IS WHY OP'S HEADLINE IS WRONG! You're not reading or paying attention to what I'm saying. This is about the 'Warren Flood Emails'.
Yes, this is an important clarification. More people need to understand the difference.
My normie friends have occasionally referred to 'Hillary's emails' when they mean either:
Hillary's emails should mean the clintonmail.com emails from her personal server that was also used for state department communications with her and her staff. But to your point, normies can't distinguish any of these. I can not recall if any/many of those were leaked, though I think some may have been released under FOIA.
Can I get a source with proof on the Russian fingerprints being fake? Need to destroy the narrative with some normies I know.
http://g-2.space/
All the docs from 'guccifer 2.0' was disinformation purposefully leaked by the DNC to make the other leaks look like they were of russian origin.