Exactly. I always try to read these and play devil's advocate, and ask myself how will the fake news cover it...what questions would they ask & how would they spin it. So, with that in mind, I thought maybe they could claim "our guys" meant the guys that they were investigating. But, let's get real. If they had evidence that anybody associated with the Trump team did this, it would have come out long ago. They wouldn't have even required a Mueller team if they had evidence of this as it occurred.
I am left to conclude that the ONLY thing this could imply is that it was the FBI that did this, and that opens up a whole other line of questions, but 2 huge questions stick out in my mind. Why would the FBI do this? If the FBI did this, what emails would they have kept to themselves and why?
I'm of the opinion that this move allowed them to control both Presidential candidates. They would have kept the more criminal emails concerning the Clinton campaign to themselves to control her and released a set through Wikileaks to show they were serious. They attempted to frame the Trump campaign for the hack activity after he won, in an attempt to control him...it didn't work.
So, now think through why didn't the DNC let the FBI have access to the server to "investigate"?
I don't think the intent was to control Trump as much as it was to control the narrative and box him in, which worked very well with the support of their co-conspirators in the MSM. The couldn't get him to do much, but they definitely stalled his administration and prevented better staffing choices.
released a set through Wikileaks to show they were serious.
That may be true, but it could also be that they simply fed the info in like they tried to do with everything else in Russiagate. The entire process has CIA written all over it.
So, now think through why didn't the DNC let the FBI have access to the server to "investigate"?
You're probably thinking they did that to avoid the FBI getting more dirt on Clinton for control. I think it's more of plausible deniability for the FBI, which was basically in on it all. We already know this based on their actions and lies. FBI refers to CrowdStrike's assessment on the server, wipes their own hands of the issue while giving Clinton a clean slate on it. If the servers or evidence is ever uncovered, FBI points back to CrowdStrike and denies knowledge or involvement. FBI could have gotten warrants for the servers if they really wanted to. I don't think they ever asked for access.
Exactly. I always try to read these and play devil's advocate, and ask myself how will the fake news cover it...what questions would they ask & how would they spin it. So, with that in mind, I thought maybe they could claim "our guys" meant the guys that they were investigating. But, let's get real. If they had evidence that anybody associated with the Trump team did this, it would have come out long ago. They wouldn't have even required a Mueller team if they had evidence of this as it occurred.
I am left to conclude that the ONLY thing this could imply is that it was the FBI that did this, and that opens up a whole other line of questions, but 2 huge questions stick out in my mind. Why would the FBI do this? If the FBI did this, what emails would they have kept to themselves and why?
I'm of the opinion that this move allowed them to control both Presidential candidates. They would have kept the more criminal emails concerning the Clinton campaign to themselves to control her and released a set through Wikileaks to show they were serious. They attempted to frame the Trump campaign for the hack activity after he won, in an attempt to control him...it didn't work.
So, now think through why didn't the DNC let the FBI have access to the server to "investigate"?
I don't think the intent was to control Trump as much as it was to control the narrative and box him in, which worked very well with the support of their co-conspirators in the MSM. The couldn't get him to do much, but they definitely stalled his administration and prevented better staffing choices.
You're probably thinking they did that to avoid the FBI getting more dirt on Clinton for control. I think it's more of plausible deniability for the FBI, which was basically in on it all. We already know this based on their actions and lies. FBI refers to CrowdStrike's assessment on the server, wipes their own hands of the issue while giving Clinton a clean slate on it. If the servers or evidence is ever uncovered, FBI points back to CrowdStrike and denies knowledge or involvement. FBI could have gotten warrants for the servers if they really wanted to. I don't think they ever asked for access.