1205
Comments (41)
sorted by:
25
hollow_fang 25 points ago +25 / -0

Mask required for entry

Proof of vaccine required for entry

Digital identifier chip required for entry

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
JesusisKing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Control. Your. Supply. Chains.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
14
BorisWave 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yeah think I'll pass on the vaccine.

Thanks though!

3
Rainman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, I started looking into vaccines more and I'm not sure many of them are worthwhile but ESPECIALLY the flu vaccines which can have very low effectiveness rates e.g. 30%.

Let's make the US priorities this... DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS FIRST

7
jimboscott 7 points ago +8 / -1

That's comparing apples to ankle holsters.

Not saying I am in favor of the vaccine, but a 95% effective vaccine for a disease that is 99.9% survivable... means the case rate will STILL be reduced 95%. That would mean, if TRUE, the U.S. would have had 400,000 cases and about 15,000 deaths had it been used from the get go.

Probably even better, as a 95% effective vaccine is INSTANT herd immunity IF it is safe and widely administered, BOTH of which remain to be seen.

I post this only to point out that the meme argument presented is a fallacious one.

6
kek_saved_the_world [S] 6 points ago +7 / -1

If I have a slight chance of dying, I'll skip another risk from a vaccine I have no control over what's in it. not to mention having to take it many times only increases risk of side effects. An astute individual will realize not a single democrat was ever infected.. this suggests they already have a solution and don't need the vaccine and their plan to crush the economy and Trump using a virus came with a simple solution they kept from the public. My bet is they get Vitamin D injections..

Vaccines are simply for control. there is a whole regiment that includes quarantine and multiple shots and tests before being "cured"...

While democrats never seem to be in risk.. that is the dog that is not barking...

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
NinjaSquirrel 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is comparing apples to ankle holsters

95% chance to not get sick

99% of surviving if you get sick

The percentages cannot be compared since 99% measures survival rate and 95% measures case rate.

2
Sumarongi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yet the meme element carries a certain truth... Why do we need a vaccine for something that doesn’t, statistically speaking, kill anyone

0
jimboscott 0 points ago +2 / -2

But, it is killing people. Not as many as the hospitals and CDC would have you to believe, but look at all the dead people in nursing homes in Washington State and New York State.

I am not at all likely to get this vaccine. The meme just falls into tattered pieces when logic is used. It compares two numbers in a rather disingenuous manner.

4
Gesirisi 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's really not killing people though. 7,000 people who died of suicide, poisoning, or accidental death (like falling off a ladder) were labeled as Covid-19 deaths.

40,000 died of cardiac arrest or heart failure, labeled as covid-19 deaths.

130,00 died of cancer, dimentia, kidney failure, obesity, or alzheimers........ labeled as covid-19 deaths.

This is from OAN documentary. When you add up the deaths, you start to realize the bare truth. Covid-19 is the common cold, or at worst the flu. That's literally all it is.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Sumarongi 3 points ago +3 / -0

The average age of death of covid 9 is 76 years old. The average life expectancy for the entire population is 76years or. Covid 19 has not discernible effect on mortality.

If you are using nursing home patients as an exple you are falling for Chinese propaganda. They stuck those people on ventilators. The ventilators killed them

0
jimboscott 0 points ago +1 / -1

Once again... not true.

The life expectancy for a 76 year old is between 86 and 87.

Life expectancy is LOWER at birth and increases with every year you succeed in NOT dying. That is how actuarial tables work.

So, those who died at 76 were, on average, being cut short by a bit more than 10 years of life.

Remember, that '76' overall life expectancy includes those who die of childhood diseases, SIDS, auto accidents, gang violence and much more.

6
sustainable_saltmine 6 points ago +6 / -0

Imagine my shock

5
dfponysoldier 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hard pass

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
Vince_Fosters_Shoe 5 points ago +5 / -0

(Pulls down pants)

I'll take it in here.

5
Cansparklingwater 5 points ago +5 / -0

Covid isn't the disease they are trying to cure. You are.

4
TexasHoney 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hopefully it will have the same result on the 3 former prick leaders.

3
coinneach007 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't forget that 0.27% of the vaccine takers will have fatel experiences or 99.73% will survive! The cure is worse than the desease!

3
IncredibleMrE1 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is my shocked face.

2
spaceman00 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the vaccine dont have 100% change of cure it will only help half of the problem.

Imagine they make a vaccine that allow you to put your body at lava, but this vaccine is 93% effective. Even if they made this vaccine no one will put his hand at lava, so the vaccine was useless to making sure people can enter lava, it will "only" work for the situation where you fall into lava by a mistake, for those situations it will work great as f*ck

2
HookLineSinker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hard pass

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Madhax47 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh no who could have known

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
TheReaper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Textbook example of insanity, just seeing how sheepish people really are.

1
jiujiujiu 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm going to have to say... nope!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Dialectic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rest In Peace, father. God bless you