7148
Comments (356)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
10
abstr4ct 10 points ago +11 / -1

Agreed, I was making a clarifying point for the less technical how a statement can be true and also false.

3
Sting 3 points ago +4 / -1

I am exactly the type of person who appreciates that comment. I was curious. Thank you for explaining it.

3
559throw 3 points ago +3 / -0

"I didn't kill the guy. I just shot the gun and he got in the way of the bullet, and the bullet killed him. Since I didn't physically touch him technically I didn't kill him."

Yeah OK sherlock get in the fucking cell

2
TwoStar 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it's a useful distinction to be clear about. The tabulators, processors, scanners, what have you were all definitely connected via netowrk. It would only take one of those devices to be open to the internet and they effectively all were. That's the purpose of the USB devices, to have an "air gap" between two computers that are not networked.

The USB devices themselves create a vulnerablility though (example: Stuxnet). I worked at a defense contractor a few years ago and all of our computers were replaced to disable USB ports and CD/DVD drives to remove vulnerabilities.