4837
Comments (84)
sorted by:
167
Brickwell 167 points ago +168 / -1

Binders full? Romney has entered the chat.

63
BasteSpuds 63 points ago +63 / -0

You bastard. You beat me to it.

30
ChicagoforTrump 30 points ago +30 / -0

Me too. Romney thinks his binders full of women trumps fraud.

6
TopperBlack 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't get it.... can you please explain

20
bill_in_texas 20 points ago +20 / -0

Candidate Romney was called a misogynist for not hiring enough women, so he says, "Hey, I've got binders of women," intending to mean he's got plenty of qualified women applicants to hire.

Leftists made one of their few funny attacks when they implied that binders of women was some kind of S&M thing.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
0
GG_Allins_1988_Shit 0 points ago +1 / -1

Obama and Biden had Binders full of Posteriors.. and they were public about it quietly.

Romney was a distraction to that fact. In fact everything bad that happened to romney was a set up. Romney was paid off to make it look like someone was running against BHO. It was a trick.

3
AmericanJawa 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's from the 2016 2012 Obama vs Romney election.

EDIT: Don't know what I was thinking listing the 2016 Election >___<

2
Sf_2468 2 points ago +2 / -0

2012

2
AmericanJawa 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're right, my bad, don't know how I made that mistake.

1
Sf_2468 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s ok, Romney is Such a price of shit it’s not worth remembering.

2
bearlawtx 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol. Me, too. Thought I was going to be so clever. Then saw I was way late.

14
kijin 14 points ago +14 / -0

But how many women are in those Binders?

12
KurtHawks941 12 points ago +12 / -0

None enough to compensate for his cuckery.

1
Plaquenil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did he Pierre on them?

9
chopz 9 points ago +9 / -0

BINDERS FULL OF EVIDENCE

4
UnderCoverTrumper 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh man, I just made the joke redundantly. Sad.

1
HandsomeBoy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Me2

77
brickinthewall 77 points ago +77 / -0

The only thing insane about this amount of evidence is the number of people who still don't believe it.

26
FreedomDeliveries 26 points ago +26 / -0

because they will never hear about it and they've been trained to disbelieve anything that has a "this is contested" tag. also everyone who shares anything about it will have their account suspended for 30 days. and the MSM will be asking Fragile Joe if they can sign his cast.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
10
Fenianlad 10 points ago +10 / -0

If you voted for Biden you already believe the shit msm shovels you. So when they tell you that this is all baloney, and Trump is a crybaby dictator, you believe that too. And of course never get shown the actual goings-on.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
35
FreedomSteak 35 points ago +35 / -0

30 Binders or it didn’t happen 🤣 -Dems probably

1
stalwart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately I think the volume of evidence is going to be a slight hinderance to the legal case. The judge isn't going to be able to get through it all in time. He'll have to skim through and if he's partisan he'll be able to cherry pick the weakest pieces of evidence and present those pieces as reason for ruling against the case and then when stronger evidence is referenced he can say he "didn't have time."

I hope that doesn't happen, but with the way most other court cases have been going I'm less hopeful than I would have been weeks ago.

1
FreedomSteak 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m sure they can winnow it if need be if they have to appeal. This is a Presidential election not a parking dispute.

Also this may be why we are getting a public legislature session so that the evidence is public and when the judge says its weak they can point to the public hearing days ago and say “the video is out there.

24
Watch_TheKarma_Burn 24 points ago +25 / -1

WE'VE GOT BINDERS FULL OF EVIDENCE!!!! SUCK IT YOU FUCKING COMMIES!!!

14
PaigeAshley 14 points ago +14 / -0

OUR PEOPLE ARE WINNERS!

2
FattyWatt 2 points ago +2 / -0

TRUMP WOOOON! 2020 <3

12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
8
The_Jelqer 8 points ago +8 / -0

Knew fuckery was afoot after Trump over performed polls in everywhere except NV in 2016. And especially now since Trump gained with Hispanics.

7
Gesirisi 7 points ago +7 / -0

Almost as much evidence as there was fake ballots

5
Ninster11 5 points ago +5 / -0

Nah theres a fuck ton more fake ballots that we still dont know about

6
12gauge 6 points ago +6 / -0

Let the record show he said "This is binders 1 - 20."

Not "This is all the evidence we have."

5
HowardRoark 5 points ago +5 / -0

If they're anything like Kaleigh's binders, then it's game over, we won. 👱🏻‍♀️📕

5
MakeAmericaLegendary 5 points ago +5 / -0

I thought the hearing in NV was today. What's tomorrow?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
WanderingJew 4 points ago +4 / -0

2000 binders = 1 Kayleigh McEnany

3
Hayride 3 points ago +3 / -0

At what point are the complicit Dems and Reps going to figure out the whole thing was a sting? There's a lot of people sweating bullets right now. Who's going to be starring in the next video? Who's credibility isn't going to be destroyed next?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Raos044 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah a judge in Hawaii ruled on it. Sorry guys.

2
Skippy737 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can only get so erect🍆

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
SupremeDearLeader2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pierre Delecto would like a word.

1
VetforTrump2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I put a child molester away for life with 8 pages of evidence. With one binder I could have gotten him a death senfence

1
Plaquenil 1 point ago +1 / -0

(!) This claim of election fraud is disputed by multiple liars!

1
dopewacks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why tomorrow? Isn't this lawyer in court right now?

1
lazercrazy3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, this is just for Nevada?

1
Dessert4TWO69 1 point ago +2 / -1

Full of women no doubt. Romney was such a douche!

1
KAGALOSAURUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Better than Mitten’s binders

1
Niburc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't the hearing today?

1
J_Von_Random 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was a court case.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
N7fury 1 point ago +1 / -0

MuH, No EvIDeNcE oF VoTeR fRaUd!! HuRr DuRr

1
Licensetomeme 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wtf..... It's like the evidence is multiplying exponentially, not unlike the ballots.

1
10MeV 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember, Charlie Brown. There is no problem so big or complicated that it cannot be run away from...

1
Clabber 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gonna be a long day. Better start prepping.

1
GoingCamaro 1 point ago +1 / -0

DEBOOOONKKEED!

1
Itiswrittenkjv1611 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh hell yeah

1
Sugar4Brains 1 point ago +1 / -0

Vegas is full of Sin

1
Homopratensis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Binders fulla fraud.

1
UnderCoverTrumper 1 point ago +1 / -0

BINDERS FULL OF EVIDENCE!

1
CommieRomney 1 point ago +1 / -0

If one single state overturns election in favor of Trump I think the cat will be out of the bag and the dominos will fall, other states following suit one at a time. Maybe Nevada can start the storm!!

1
21ninjas 1 point ago +1 / -0

IMPRESSIVE LENGTH!

1
DblFistinPiston 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh yeah? I bet they all have the first page blank so it's not really that big.

1
Araket 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't get it. If there is one thing I have learned over the last 4 years, it's that evidence means absolutely zero to a liberal, it is worthless, feelings are all that matter. Problem is liberals have infiltrated everywhere in government. In a functioning USA that followed law and constitution this case would have been settled weeks ago. In reality, they might as well throw those binders of evidence out at the local dump, right there on top of all the uncounted Trump ballots because the people in the high places don't give a shit. Time for the fucking insurrection act already.

1
CommanderMontague 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trapper Keepers for everyone! hooray!

1
grassshrimp 1 point ago +1 / -0

Facebook, Twitter, Google and Reddit already told me it's deeebbbuuunnnkkkeeed. There is no evidence of election fraud.

1
GEOTUSSCOTUS 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuuuuuuuuuck. its happening

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ProphetBoi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can't tell if this would get Romney off or set him off.

0
Dessert4TWO69 0 points ago +1 / -1

20 seems like too round of a number to be legit...

1
Ninster11 1 point ago +1 / -0

It says, over meaning theres more then 20, less then 30 maybe less then 25. It just sounds better then saying 22 binders.

-7
TheSuperStableGenius -7 points ago +1 / -8

Let's hope it's evidence... Not statements from people saying they heard they saw someone see something that someone else heard.

8
chicago_prisoner 8 points ago +8 / -0

Affidavits are statements taken under oath and are evidence.

6
Ninster11 6 points ago +6 / -0

You cant just lie in an affidavit either doing so would be illegal.

-1
TheSuperStableGenius -1 points ago +1 / -2

Maybe by a legal definition, in a practical reality? Not even close. Anyone can swear to anything under "penalty of perjury", when that penalty doesn't actually exist. Look at the tens of thousands who swore under penalty of perjury that they were voting in the county of their residence, hell THE STATE of their residence, and did the exact opposite and not a damn thing happened... The entire legal system has lost credibility, when you have two sets of laws and selectively enforce laws people refuse to acknowledge or respect your authority and their response to your attempt to exercise that authority ends in deadly consequences.. .