That land was never the Indians' to give away in the first place, so of course they'd accept any offer for "their" land that they received. It's like someone offering you 100$ for your neighbor's house.
And they didn't get "decimated". They got conquered. Just like thousands of peoples before them. Deal with it.
its depends on the tribe, some were peaceful traders that had treaties with neighboring tribes, usually the more settled ones. some were downright viscious. some tribes deliberately wiped out enemy tribes etc. some were really accepting of the settlers, some were pricks. but yeah it wasnt like all kumbaya, and then the white man came.. thats lefty racist bullshit that thinks they were all one big happpy family across the whole continent.
That's not really accurate. I have seen ancient copper relics that were found in southern Ohio. They were made from native copper found around lake superior silver can also be found there as well. https://infogalactic.com/info/Old_Copper_Complex
They did have cities. Cahokia outside of St. Louis was ~15k people about 900 years ago. They had several “woodhenges” for marking the equinoxes and solstices. They also found copper worked items at the site. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cahokia
They didn't really even get conquered. The Sioux and Tecumseh's alliance maybe. Most tribes weren't populous to begin with and died of disease. The Cherokee were sold out by their own Joe Bidens.
But it's also not racist to discriminate against Chinese American students in Universities. Dems are great at using the race card to their advantage every time.
That land was never the Indians' to give away in the first place, so of course they'd accept any offer for "their" land that they received. It's like someone offering you 100$ for your neighbor's house.
And they didn't get "decimated". They got conquered. Just like thousands of peoples before them. Deal with it.
This post I like. The Indians WERE savages, not peaceful clairvoyant innocents.
Democrats gonna democrat
its depends on the tribe, some were peaceful traders that had treaties with neighboring tribes, usually the more settled ones. some were downright viscious. some tribes deliberately wiped out enemy tribes etc. some were really accepting of the settlers, some were pricks. but yeah it wasnt like all kumbaya, and then the white man came.. thats lefty racist bullshit that thinks they were all one big happpy family across the whole continent.
literally stone age people. they didn't have wheels, metal working, or cities.
(i'm talking about natives within the US' borders. Aztecs and Mayans don't count).
That's not really accurate. I have seen ancient copper relics that were found in southern Ohio. They were made from native copper found around lake superior silver can also be found there as well. https://infogalactic.com/info/Old_Copper_Complex
They did have cities. Cahokia outside of St. Louis was ~15k people about 900 years ago. They had several “woodhenges” for marking the equinoxes and solstices. They also found copper worked items at the site. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cahokia
They didn't really even get conquered. The Sioux and Tecumseh's alliance maybe. Most tribes weren't populous to begin with and died of disease. The Cherokee were sold out by their own Joe Bidens.
Yep, King Philips war pedes research that a little
And killed by disease. Which no one understood at the time. (Referring to 1500-1700s)
~ it's racist to blame China for the Wu flu
~ it's absolutely great to blame the Europeans for smallpox
But it's also not racist to discriminate against Chinese American students in Universities. Dems are great at using the race card to their advantage every time.
Thank you.
Wait you mean to tell me there weren't written laws back then and borders telling people that the land belonged to them!? WHAT!!?
You mean to tell me they were simply nomads running around all over the place with no permanent home? NANII!?